Judge Adds 2 Years to Oversight of RI DD Consent Decree

A. Anthony Antosh, Court Monitor, illustrates three stages leading to full implementation of consent decree, shown on right

By Gina Macris

A federal judge will retain jurisdiction over a civil rights consent decree until June 30, 2026 to ensure that a fully funded reorganized system of services has a positive impact on the lives of roughly 4,000 Rhode Island adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

The added oversight does not extend or revise the terms of the consent decree, signed in 2014, which requires that the state put into place all required components of an individualized, community-facing system of services for adults with IDD by June 30, 2024.

John J. McConnell Jr., Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court, labeled the additional two years of oversight an “addendum” to the consent decree in an Oct. 2 court order. He said that the oversight period will ensure that the funding, policies and a newadministrative framework required by the consent decree become firmly established.

In the court order, the judge also said that A. Anthony Antosh, an independent court monitor, will continue evaluating consent decree compliance until 2026.

At the same time, McConnell noted that he is stepping back from holding periodic public hearings on consent decree compliance but will be available should Antosh find reason for his intervention.

McConnell has been personally involved in overseeing the case since January, 2016.

More than two months ago, McConnell said that, despite the state’s “tremendous progress,” it was “abundantly clear that it will not be in compliance” on July 1, 2024, in terms of effecting positive changes in the lives of adults with IDD.

“Because we are able to recognize this a year in advance, the parties should get together with the monitor and negotiate an addendum to the consent decree to ensure substantial compliance at the quickest possible time,” McConnell said at a public hearing Aug. 1.

The monitor and lawyers for the state and the federal Department of Justice (DOJ) negotiated the addendum and met with McConnell privately a few days before the judge turned it into a court order.

A Decade Of Growing Pains

In 2014, Lincoln Chafee, then governor, signed a consent decree promising major changes for Rhode Island’s developmentally disabled population to settle a DOJ civil lawsuit alleging that the state’s segregated programs violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

The state agreed to create a community-facing approach that put the needs of individuals at the center of thoughtful plans for employment and other services that enabled them to lead regular lives. The agreement is to expire June 30, 2024.

At the outset, the DOJ expected that a decade would be time enough for a new system of services to take hold and show results in the daily lives of the consent decree population. DOJ lawyers have testified that, in general, they want to see at least a year’s successful track record before they will sign off on an agreement like the consent decree.

  The first six years of the consent decree in Rhode Island were marked by piecemeal changes, the largest being the shutdown of sheltered workshops. But the funding and the bureaucracy underpinning a segregated system remained.

Then the COVID-19 pandemic halted progress and decimated the already underfunded and unstable workforce of the private agencies that the state relies on to provide IDD services.

The slowdown in reform became so serious that the DOJ asked McConnell in 2021 to find the state in contempt and to levy heavy fines. That request ignited a pledge by the state to take a number of steps, including a review of the rates it pays private providers and an overhaul of regulations to promote individualized, community-based services.

Reforms Accelerate

In his Oct. 2 court order, McConnell reviews, in meticulous detail, the state’s progress in achieving the goals of the consent decree and the myriad actions still to be taken if the state is to meet the June 30, 2024 deadline.

In the past year, the state, working with the community, has done intensive and laudatory work to plan the components of the needed infrastructure for a new system, Antosh wrote in a commentary that accompanied the court order.

 But the “majority of these plans have not yet been fully implemented,” he wrote, emphasizing the need for additional oversight in bold type. “The impact on outcomes and individual lives has just begun.”

Jobs: McConnell said the state has fulfilled Employment First policy requirements emphasizing competitive employment in the community and has met the number of job placements required in the consent decree.

The current budget provides for all those with IDD to get support in finding and keeping a job, as well as “discovery” activities and internships that help people with a limited variety of life experiences broaden their ideas about what kinds of work they might enjoy.

But not everyone can sign up today for those job-related supports. Making these services universally available is part of the implementation McConnell and Antosh said they want to see by next July 1.

The state, through legislative action, also has ended the sub-minimum wages that sheltered workshop employees and other adults with IDD were paid.

Not everybody in the IDD population wants a job. Those who want to opt out of job-seeking activities may do so through a “variance” process involving the monitor. About 100 people have taken advantage of it.

Assessing Needs: The state has created a new multi-step assessment designed to capture unique needs up front and provide funding accordingly. The old approach to assessment, based on a scripted questionnaire, assigned all 4000 persons with IDD into one of 20 funding categories that did not automatically provide for employment services.

Even though the needs of those with IDD remain relatively the same over a lifetime, individuals were sometimes recategorized into a lower funding level.

Other times, the assessment failed to capture medical or behavioral needs. In both cases, families and service providers were forced to file time-consuming appeals every year to secure and maintain added supports.

Critics said the assessment was being used to control the budget, not to serve persons with IDD. State officials have objected to those characterizations.

The new assessment keeps the original scripted interview, called the Supports Intensity Scale, adds a new questionnaire aimed at capturing supplemental needs, and finishes with an open-ended interview with individuals and families to ensure that nothing was missed in the first two sessions.

Not everyone has had the new assessment yet, but McConnell’s order says that the entire consent decree population must go through it by the end of June, 2024.

By that date, all members of the IDD population also must have access to an independent facilitator who will help them translate the assessment into an appropriate program of supports and services, McConnell said.

State Funding: Over the last three years, the state has spent total of about $120 million, more than half of it federal Medicaid dollars, to transform a system that incentivized the segregation of adults with developmental disabilities in sheltered workshops and day care centers.

 The $120 million total includes $75 million in the fiscal year that began July 1 to fund a new rate structure that promotes employment in the community and other integrated activities, according to Antosh.

Community Experience: McConnell said 80 percent of the adults with IDD participate in community activities, but the state needs to ensure that everyone eligible has regular experience in the community by the time the two-year oversight period concludes.

Transitioning to Adult Services: The consent decree also protects high school students with IDD aging out of school into adult services. McConnell and the monitor said the state has made progress in laying the groundwork for a seamless transition from high school to adulthood, but more needs to be done.

For example, transition plans more focused on jobs and careers must be implemented by June 30, 2024. The number of work internships for high school students must increase, and the state must show that by their 20th birthdays, 80 percent of youth with IDD have applied for adult services, with assistance.

Implementation Science Guides Monitor

 The process of societal change is slow, Antosh said, relying on implementation science to help put the consent decree in historical perspective.

Implementation science tracks the ways research translates into policies and practices in health and the social sciences and the long-term effect these changes have on the target population.

In a similar fashion, Antosh will be tracking the effect of the consent decree on Rhode Island’s IDD population, as shown in the graph above. It forms part of his commentary.

It took 25 years for the state to move from institutionalizing children and adults with IDD to a functioning community system in the early 2000s, as understanding grew that “individuals could have meaningful community lives and could be employed,” Antosh said.

In the first several years of the new century, Rhode Island gained a national reputation for having one of the best systems in the country.

“Then came several years of underfunding and decreasing services -a good system became significantly less so. This directly resulted in the Department of Justice investigation of Rhode Island and the Consent decree in 2014.” Antosh wrote.

Until the Rhode Island Consent decree was signed, the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, reinforced by the 1999 Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, was brought to bear in the courts to make the case that persons with disabilities are entitled to community-based living arrangements.

The consent decree was considered a landmark event because for the first time, it applied the Olmstead decision to what individuals with IDD did during their waking hours.

With Employment First at the heart of its mandate, the the consent decree assumes that all individuals can work and interact in the community, “not in groups, but as individuals who have preferences and can make choices,” Antosh said.

He said implementation science indicates that it takes 10 to 20 years to fully implement new practices and change expectations among the public.

But the consent decree is still in the “early stages” of implementation, making the need for additional oversight important in ensuring that new policies and practices take root and begin to have an impact on the community.

The monitor has made it clear that that successful implementation of the consent decree will depend on individuals with IDD reporting on positive changes in their own lives by the time the added two-year oversight period ends.

To read the entire court order, click here.

To read the monitor’s commentary, click here.

RI's New DD Services Begin Roll-Out

Anne LeClerc Explains New Assessment Process in Virtual Meeting Via Advocates In Action RI

By Gina Macris

After years of looking the other way, the Rhode Island General Assembly has funded comprehensive reform of the state’s developmental disabilities services.

What the new system will look like to the people that it will serve – individuals with disabilities, their families and agencies that provide services – has yet to be fully fleshed out. State officials are putting the final pieces together and explaining the changes to the developmental disabilities community.

But the overall outline of reform is clear, and the state has hired additional staff to communicate the changes and help with implementation.

As of July 1, state officials have been given the money to do the job: a $78.1 million reform package proposed by Gov. Dan McKee and approved by the General Assembly last month.

Services for adults living with intellectual and developmental challenges are funded through the federal-state Medicaid program, with the federal government supporting slightly more than half the cost.

In all, the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) will receive $469.1 million during the current fiscal year, nearly $92.8 million more than the final allocation for the budget cycle that ended June 30. The DDD spending ceiling makes up nearly 70 percent of a total budget of $672.8 million for the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH.)

The new budget marks a watershed moment in the life of a federal court consent decree, signed in 2014 by then-Governor Lincoln Chafee and representatives of the federal Department Of Justice, which had filed suit to enforce the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA.)

A Capsule History

The agreement committed the state to improve the quality of life of adults who had been warehoused in sheltered workshops or day care centers., in violation of the ADA’s Integration Mandate. Except in rare cases, such settlements cannot be appealed.

But it has taken another nine years of dogged federal enforcement, as well as emerging advocacy at the State House, for state government to come up with the necessary funding and reorganize the bureaucracy to turn the system around.

For years, the state’s powerbrokers paid lip service to the consent decree, setting up pilot programs that were never expanded and adding pennies to the poverty wages of workers in private agencies that did the day-to-day work of implementation. Staff attrition grew to be the number one problem in providing services.

Then in 2021, Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court, started ratcheting up the pressure, issuing one order after another that dealt with caregiver wages and other issues.

Under threat of a contempt finding and hefty fines, the state produced a comprehensive action plan for consent decree compliance, which McConnell approved in October, 2021.

The Role of Advocacy

A former court monitor in the case, Charles Moseley, once said that judicial action can go only so far. Enduring change depends on the advocacy of the people.

While consent decree case dragged on before Judge McConnell, the developmental disabilities community shifted strategy at the State House, joining forces with dozens of other organizations to send the message that the chronically underfunded developmental disabilities system was just a microcosm of all Medicaid health and human service programs in the state.

For State Sen. Louis DiPalma, who became chairman of the Senate Finance Committee earlier this year, all the coalition’s voices shine the light on broad inequities in healthcare and human services.

A law enacted in 2022 with the leadership of DiPalma in the Senate and Deputy Majority Leader Julie Casimiro in the House has tasked the state’s health insurance commissioner with revising Medicaid reimbursement rates every two years. The first set of recommendations is due out in the fall and will be waiting for the General Assembly when it convenes again in January.

Beginning in 2016, when DiPalma pushed back against an impractical plan to pay for the consent decree by cutting group home costs, he has gained prominence as an advocate for adults with developmental disabilities.

From his earliest days as a legislator, he said, he has sought equity for everyday Rhode Islanders based on “facts and data.” DiPalma has served in the Senate since 2009.

The Power of the Court

Key facets of the latest funding for developmental disabilities can be traced back to specific court orders that McConnell has issued in the last two and a half years –as well as recommendations from an independent court monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, appointed by McConnell.

• An entry-level wage for direct care workers of $20 an hour, with an average rate of $22.14 an hour for more experienced caregivers. This pay bump, from a minimum of $18 an hour, costs $30.8 million, including $13.9 million in state funding, and the rest in federal Medicaid dollars. A court order issued Jan. 6, 2021 said the $20 rate must go into effect by Jan. 1, 2024.

• An additional $44.2 million from Medicaid, including $20 million from the state, to increase flexibility in providing community-based services available to adults with developmental disabilities. Until the monitor spoke up in a court session earlier this year, the state had planned to continue providing 40 percent of daytime services in day centers. The increased funding authorizes additional staffing for community-based activities anytime of the day seven days a week.

• $3.1 million, including $935,465 in state revenue, to reflect a last-minute projected cost increase for the developmental disabilities caseload calculated during the May Caseload Estimating Conference. (An earlier article citing $75 million in reforms did not take into account the results of the Caseload Estimating Conference.)

The Bureaucracy Matters

In the Caseload Estimating Conference, fiscal representatives of the House and Senate leadership and the governor convene with human services officials in public twice a year to do the math around the state’s public assistance obligations. There is a similar Revenue Estimating Conference.

The impetus for including developmental disabilities in caseload estimating came from one of Judge McConnell’s court orders.

Until developmental disabilities services were included in the Caseload Estimating Conference in November, 2021, budgeting for this segment of the population lacked transparency. Families and advocates approached each new session of the General Assembly with dread because of the uncertainty about sufficient funding.

Under the old system of service delivery, individual funding for adults with intellectual and developmental challenges – about 4,000 people - was made to fit into one of 20 boxes, and anyone who needed anything more had to file an arduous appeal.

Most of the appeals were granted, after service providers and families showed the individual really needed a particular service. But the added funding often lasted only for 12 months, and the appeal process began once again.

In the meantime, BHDDH officials were berated by lawmakers for constantly running budget deficits. At one point, BHDDH projected a $26 million deficit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 because of extra individual funding granted on apppeal.

Changes Take Shape

During a recent interview, DiPalma, the Senate finance committee chairman, outlined additional features of the new state budget that will benefit all people with all kinds of disabilities:

• Increased access to the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority’s (RIPTA’s) paratransit program through $500,00 in vouchers for people who live outside the geographical catchment area for this service. DiPalma said a lack of transportation often keeps people from getting a job or engaging in community activities.

• Adoption of the Ticket-to-Work program, which removes limits on earnings of people receiving federal disability payments. This change is expected to boost enthusiasm among those who might fear losing benefits if they get a job.

In the new system, individuals will get the funding and services they need “up front,” said Anne LeClerc, Associate Director of Program Performance at DDD during a virtual public forum last month.

The state will supplement its standard assessment with a questionnaire to draw out any needs that might have been overlooked, instead of allocating a cookie-cutter funding level and waiting for an appeal.

The new approach will “make it better for everybody,” LeClerc said. “And every year, we’ll be doing an ongoing review to make sure that the funding is appropriate,” she said.

Appeals will still be an option, but officials believe the new approach will cut the numbers down significantly, she said.

In another big change, individuals will no longer have to give up any services to get employment-related supports. Instead, the reforms will make job supports available to all who want them.

State officials have insisted they will fully comply with the consent decree by the deadline next June 30, but even the rapid changes being made today probably will not be fast enough to meet the deadline.

LeClerc and others admitted it will take a year to phase in all the pieces of the new model with everyone eligible for services.

For example, LeClerc said the questionnaire intended to draw out any supplementary needs not captured in the basic assessment hasn’t been finalized yet. And the latest version of the assessment itself, revised by American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities during 2022, has not yet been put into use in Rhode Island.

While the interviewers have been trained in the new model, DDD officials indicated the revised assessment would not roll out until August at the earliest.

LeClerc said the state will need to collect the data from 500 assessments before it can devise a new funding formula.

The DOJ has said it requires at least a year’s smooth implementation of court-approved changes before it signs off on a consent decree.

A DOJ lawyer, Amy Romero, warned the state last December that it needed to bring a sense of urgency to its efforts to meet the deadline for full compliance, even as she praised officials’ stepped-up efforts in 2022.

Antosh, the independent court monitor in the case, is expected to file his assessment of the state’s latest efforts before the end of July.

DDD Expands Staff

To help with implementation of the consent decree, DDD has filled a year-long vacancy in the administrative position dedicated to employment-related support and made several other appointments. The budget sets aside $203,275 for eight new permanent positions dedicated to the consent decree.

Elvys Ruiz, who has more than 20 years’ experience in state service, was hired in May as Administrator for Business and Community Engagement. A native of the Dominican Republic, he is a former interim administrator of the Minority Business Enterprise Compliance Office at the Department of Administration and also has experience at the Department of Human Services and the Department of Transportation. Ruiz succeeds Tracey Cunningham, who left more than a year ago.

Six new DDD staffers also were introduced at the virtual public forum in June, including at least one who will be working directly with individuals and families who direct their own program of services, a segment that makes up one quarter of the caseload.

• Amethys Nieves was hired in May as Associate Administrator of Community Services to work on improving information and communication. She has degrees in psychology and social work and has experience and has experience in providing direct services and in development of healthcare programming.

• Johanna Mercado and Jackie Camilloni also have been hired as part of a communications team as coordinators of Community Planning and Development, with Camilloni focusing on individuals and families who direct their own services, a group that now makes up about 25 percent of the developmental disabilities caseload. Mercado is an academic librarian with degrees in political science and library science. Camilloni has 25 years’ experience at a privately-run organization serving adults and children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD). She also has worked as a state social worker at both the Department of Children, Youth and Families and DDD.

• Steven Seay is the new Coordinator of Integrated Community Services. He has worked in the human services for thirty years, with experience in developmental disabilities, nursing home social services, and adult protective services. Most recently, he worked in DDD’s Office of Quality Improvement.

• Kelly Peterson, a former DDD social worker and supervisor, has been hired as the new Chief of Training, Staff Development and Continuous Quality Improvement to oversee changes in professional practice required by the consent decree. She also has worked as a DCYF social worker.

• Peter Joly, who has worked in the mental health field for more than 20 years, has been hired as a Principal Community Development and Training Specialist. He also has experience providing services for adults with developmental disabilities.

• Cynthia Fusco, chief assistant to DDD director Kevin Savage, has been promoted to a new position as Interdepartmental Project Manager.

Next Steps

Judge McConnell has scheduled a public status hearing Tuesday, Aug. 1 at 10 a.m. The hearing will be accessible remotely. (He will meet with lawyers in chambers in late September, but that session is closed to the public.) To watch the August 1 hearing, go to the Court’s calendar page, enter the date of the hearing and select Judge McConnell’s name from the drop-down menu of judges. Click on “Go” to get to a link to instructions for public access to the hearing.

DDD, meanwhile, is holding in-person and virtual public meetings where officials have said they will add greater detail to the overview of the new system they outlined June 20.

A video recording of the June 20 public forum is on the Facebook page of Advocates In Action RI

Three informational sessions remain in July:

• Wednesday, July 19, 2023 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Rochambeau Library Community Room 708 Hope St, Providence

• Tuesday, July 25, 2023 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM, Warwick Public Library Large Meeting Room 600 Sandy Lane, Warwick

• Virtual public meeting Thursday, July 27, 2023 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM. Click here to register via Zoom.

RI Governor Seeks Tens of Millions More For DD To Expand Community Services

By Gina Macris

This article has been updated

Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee has more than doubled the hike he is seeking from the General Assembly for developmental disabilities services in the next fiscal year. The overall funding increase is intended to expand opportunities for people to participate in community activities and increase the direct care workforce by offering higher pay.

A consultant for the state alluded to the funding hike during an April 27 hearing before Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. of the U.S. District Court, who heard a progress report on the state’s implementation of a 2014 consent decree intended to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities. The amount of the increase was not mentioned in court but appears in updated documents on the website of the state budget office.

McKee originally earmarked $30.8 million to raise the minimum wage for direct care workers from $18 to $20 an hour to comply with a court order. The raises were to be part of a $385 million spending limit for private developmental disabilities services for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

On April 17, the state budget office raised the set-aside for raises to $75 million, including about $33.9 million in state revenue and about $25.8 million from federal funds in the federal-state Medicaid program. The budget amendmentes the new total for the private developmental disabilities system to $429.5 million.

The dramatic hike in funding anticipates a significant policy change that will allow private service providers to bill at higher rates on the assumption that all activities will involve supports in the community and will require more intensive staffing than center-based care.

Maintaining a regular gym schedule, attending an art or dance class, meeting a someone for coffee or going shopping are all activities most people take for granted, but those with developmental disabilities often need help with transportation and other supports to make these things happen.

The shift to 100 percent community-based services would eliminate the practice of budgeting for 40 percent of each client’s time in a day care center, which requires less intensive staffing but doesn’t offer people individualized or purposeful choices. A group cooking class, for example, may not succeed in teaching skills enabling participants to cook more independently at home.

The so-called “60-40” split between community and center-based care has been criticized by an independent court monitor overseeing the consent decree, who said the state must do everything it can to promote integration in the community to fully comply with the agreement.

The state’s consultant in a court-ordered rate review of Rhode Island’s developmental disabilities system explained the change in approach to daytime services during the April 27 hearing before Judge McConnell.

Stephen Pawlowski, managing director of the Burns and Associates Division of Health Management Associates, (HMA-Burns), said those who want center-based care may still choose it.

The recommendations of the HMA-Burns rate review, as well as the money to go with them, will need General Assembly approval before they go into effect July 1.

Feds Want Results

During the hearing, the independent monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, and a Justice Department lawyer, Amy Romero, applauded the administrative efforts of the state in recent months.

At the same time, they warned that full compliance with the consent decree will depend on results – more adults with developmental disabilities holding jobs and more community connections. And the deadline for full compliance is only 14 months away, June 30, 2024.

Romero, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Rhode Island, previously raised concerns about the state meeting the 2024 deadline.

In the latest hearing, she commended the state for its efforts in the rate review process, but she also said the state must bring a sense of urgency to the push for more employment – one of the chief goals of the consent decree.

In frequent meetings with adults with developmental disabilities, she said, “meeting somebody with a job is the exception.”

“There are a lot of people out there who want to work and are not working,” she said. “It’s a missed opportunity with the employers themselves.”

The rate review would make employment-related supports available to everyone as an add-on to individual basic budgets.

Under the current rules, employment-related supports come at the expense of something else in the basic budgets. As a result, the number of overall service hours are reduced, because services like job development and job coaching cost more than other categories of support.

Since the consent decree was signed in 2014, the General Assembly has periodically earmarked separate funding for pilot employment programs in the developmental disabilities budget that don’t require individuals to give up service hours. The most recent one ended a year ago, shortly after the chief of employment services in the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) departed.

A new employment chief will start work May 8, according to a spokesman for the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

Some adults with developmental disabilities have been able get around the restrictions of the basic budgets if they have a service provider who gets funding for job supports from the Department of Labor and Training, or if they can get help from the Office of Rehabilitation Services.

And some high school students with developmental disabilities have gone from internships to real jobs as they move on to adult developmental disability services, although they have been the exceptions.

A spokesman for the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) told the monitor, Antosh, that the agency is helping school districts plan revisions to transition services to put a greater emphasis on job-seeking.

Assessment Issues Remain

During the hearing, Antosh brought up another piece of unfinished business that poses a challenge for the state; figuring out how to apply the new rate structure so that everyone approved for services gets the supports they need.

The shift to community-based day services, by itself, will not achieve that goal, because of the way the assessment of individual needs is currently linked to funding.

Antosh said he continues to hear from families who are concerned about the accuracy of the assessment in its existing form.

The algorithm – or mathematical formula – used to turn the scores from the assessment into individual funding “needs to change,” he said. The assessment itself was not designed as a funding tool, but the developer, the American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), still allows many states to use it that way.

After Rhode Island began its rate review in early 2022, AAIDD announced it would spend the next year overhauling the assessment, called the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).

The second edition of the SIS was not released until mid-March of this year, and the state won’t begin to use the revised assessment until June. After that, a sample of 600 assessments will be needed before officials can do the math in a systematic way to assign budgets.

With each assessment taking two to three hours per person, the process of collecting 600 sets of scores is expected to take about six months.

In addition, the way the second edition of the SIS is scored is substantially different than the first edition, said Pawlowski of HMA-Burns.

Heather Mincey, Assistant Director of DDD, said that going forward, the SIS will not be the only measure used to determine support needs.

The second edition of the SIS will come with supplemental questions to capture exceptional needs like behavioral and medical issues.

But Mincey said there will be an additional set of supplemental questions, as well as an interview with individuals and their families to determine if there is any support need the assessment missed.

Independent facilitators will work with the assessment results to help individuals and families plan a program of supports, and then the funding will be assigned.

Currently, the funding is assigned directly from the SIS scores, and services are planned to fit the budgets.

Antosh has said the existing approach does not allow for the individualization necessary to comply with the consent decree.

The individual facilitators, proposed by Antosh, would be trained in a “person-centered” approach that incorporates short-term and long-term goals into a purposeful program of services built around the preferences and needs of the individual involved.

The person-cantered approach is considered a “best practice” in developmental disabilities that preserves people’s right to lead regular lives in their communities in compliance with the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which gives the consent decree its legal authority. The Olmstead decision reinforced the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The facilitators for person-centered planning have not yet been hired.

Mincey said the state is working with the Sherlock Center on Disabilities at Rhode Island College to develop a job description for the facilitators. They would not be state employees.

Governor’s Budget Amendments

In separate budget amendments on April 17, the Governor asked the General Assembly for additional funding to pay for the technology needed for them to do their jobs.

It calls for an information technology contract totaling $250,00 for so-called “conflict-free case management” to be implemented by the facilitators. All but $25,000 would be federal funds.

Antosh also asked Mincey what the state is doing to improve communication with families, who will have to absorb a considerable breadth of new information to take advantage of new opportunities in developmental disability services.

She highlighted the eight new positions being added to the staff of the Division of Developmental Disabilities who will focus on communication and training. All but one position has been filled, according to a BHDDH spokesman, Two have begun work, he added later.

Those new positions will cost $203,275 for the first full year, taking into account federal Medicaid reimbursements and savings from staff turnover in other positions, according to the governor’s original budget proposal.

The April 27 hearing serviced as an interim progress report as the state bears down on a court-ordered July 1 deadline to implement rate hikes and other administrative changes.

Antosh said he plans to write an evaluation of the state’s progress about mid-July. Judge McConnell said he will hold the next consent decree hearing about August 1. The exact date, later published by the court, is Tuesday, August 1 at 10 a.m, with public access available remotely.

The current developmental disabilities budget is $383.4 million, including nearly $352.9 million for the privately-run system and nearly $30.6 million for the state’-run group home network, which is not involved in the consent decree.

The governor’s revised budget for the current fiscal year would pare overall developmental disabilities spending to $377.3 million by June 30, including about $348.5 million for the private system and about $28.3 million for the state group homes, called Rhode Island Community Living and Supports (RICLAS.)

For Fiscal 2024, the total federal-state Medicaid funding would be $461.8 million for the private and state-run systems, according to the amended budget proposal. That total includes about $429.5 million for the private system and about $32.4 million for the state-run system.

Related content:

McKee’s original budget proposal is covered in an article here.

Pawlowski presented a PowerPoint on updated “rate and payments options” to the court that has been released by the state. Read it here.

Insurmountable Deadline?

By Gina Macris

An independent federal court monitor says there is “minimal likelihood” Rhode Island will achieve ultimate compliance with a long-running civil rights consent decree in 2024 unless all court-ordered changes to the developmental disabilities system are implemented by July 1 – three months from now.

The monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, submitted a status report on the case to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court in advance of a public hearing April 27.

He said many changes are needed in the developmental disabilities system to increase employment and participation in community activities in keeping with the Integration Mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In the end, these new experiences in the workplace and in the community will change lives, Antosh said.

A. Anthony Antosh

The state Director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities, Kevin Savage, expressed confidence in a recent virtual public forum that the state will meet the deadline for full compliance on June 30, 2024 but gave few details.

With less than 15 months remaining in the term of the consent decree, the monitor spelled out the ways the state is still in the “messy middle” of change, with few measurable results so far.

For example, in the year between October, 2021, and October, 2022, a total of 16 persons with developmental disabilities got jobs, bringing the total number of employment placements to 984 during the life of the consent decree, or 68 percent of the compliance target - 1456.

In addition, interviews conducted with 25 adults eligible for developmental disability services indicated that the consent decree, signed in 2014, has not yet impacted the lives of most people it is intended to protect. Only about 30 percent of those interviewed had a knowledge or understanding of the consent decree, Antosh said.

“This is not really surprising, given that BHDDH does not do direct communication with all individuals / families on a routine basis,” he said. Improving communication must become a priority, particularly in light of numerous changes that must be implemented during the next year.

Antosh said additional interviews will be conducted to monitor the effect of the consent decree on individuals receiving services. For the state to reach full compliance, at least two thirds those interviewed must report they have a “community-based life, achievement of personal goals, and satisfaction.”

The April 27 hearing will allow the court to clarify its position on details of implementation just before state budget talks shift into high gear in May for spending in the next fiscal year. The General Assembly is expected to consider hefty increases in funding and changes to the way developmental disabilities services are delivered in accordance with a rate review by an outside consultant.

“It should be noted that the State essentially agrees with all of the expectations and required actions,” Antosh said, but a lack of capacity has prevented it from moving faster to complete all the required changes.

A decade of chronic underfunding depressed the wages of caregivers and destabilized the developmental disabilities workforce until the state, pressured by the court, increased pay by about 40 percent in the past two years from an average of $13.18 per hour to $19.52. While a workforce recruitment initiative has shown some success in hiring and retention, the number of direct care workers has still not hit pre-pandemic levels, Antosh said.

The consultant for the rate review, the Burns & Associates Division of Health Management Associates (HMA-Burns), has recommended additional rate increases of about 22 percent, which would cost $57 million, according to projections made in January. Based on a court ordered minimum wage of $20 an hour for direct care workers planned for July, HMA-Burns has projected the average hourly pay will be $22.14 in the coming fiscal year.

But the system-wide changes necessary to comply with the consent decree involve a careful orchestration of many moving parts, including professional development and training. Antosh said the state must budget for training separately from the rate structure for direct care workers and others. In the rate review, HMA-Burns included time spent in training activities as part of a mathematical formula for determining hourly rates, but Antosh said that doesn’t cover the cost of the training that will be expected.

While state has been making mostly satisfactory progress in planning activities the last few months, the “ultimate criterion” will be the “quality of implementation,” the monitor said.

Antosh said BHDDH is in the process of hiring eight new staff members in the Division of Developmental Disabilities to help direct implementation efforts and also has received approval to hire a Spanish-speaking social worker. That change, which appears to carve out an exception to union seniority rules, responds to complaints from the Latino community that date back to the inception of the consent decree in 2014.

Some social workers already on staff will be re-assigned to high schools to help teenagers making the transition from special education to the adult service system, Antosh said.

The monitor laid out another major change he said is essential in ensuring that persons with developmental disabilities get individualized programs of services that help them lead regular lives in their communities.

Until now, the state has used a standardized assessment called the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) for determining individual budgets from a menu of about 20 options, depending on a person’s degree ability to function independently – or lack of it. Programming has been fit into the budgets.

Antosh says planning for individualized services must come ahead of budgeting to ensure a “person-centered” approach in which the needs, preferences and goals of individuals drive the programming.

While the state has already agreed to make employment-related supports available to all by separating these services from core budget options, Antosh said the same must be done for community-based activities.

HMA-Burns recommends that all day programs, including center-based care and community activities, remain part of core budgets assigned by levels, or tiers of support determined through the SIS assessment. Transportation, overnight shared supports, and respite care also would be part of the core budgets, with individuals having the option of shifting funds between categories.

As an example of the trade-off, the rate review cited the hypothetical example of an individual who could choose to receive fewer hours of daytime services to get more transportation.

But the monitor said, in bold type for emphasis, that community-based activities “should NOT be subtracted from core individual budgets.”

“Development and expansion of community-based models for employment and community participation need to be a primary focus for 2023-2024,” he said.

Several factors related to the assessment and planning process will complicate the implementation of a “person-centered” approach:

• The state doesn’t yet have a budget for paying the independent facilitators or case managers

• A revised version of the SIS assessment to be used by facilitators was released by its developer only a month ago, in mid-March.

• The supplemental assessment questions are just now being rolled out in SIS interviews.

• Both the new SIS and the supplemental questions require a ramp-up period to be fully integrated into the assessment process.

In a workflow chart attached to the monitor’s report, the state indicated it plans to have all components in place by July 1.

The hearing will be streamed live before Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. April 27 at 2 p.m. The Zoom meeting ID is 161 975 2551 and the Passcode is 651294. For a link to the court’s Zoom platform and an up-to-the-minute court calendar, click here

Find the latest Monitor’s report here

The monitor included attachments from the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, the Rhode Island Department of Education, which is responsible for transition services for high school students with developmental disabilities; and a multi-agency report on coordinating funding sources for employment supports.

In addition, The Executive Office of Health and Human Services submitted a report on a pilot program for “conflict-free case management”, which will use the independent facilitators the monitor mentioned, and is required by the is Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for all Medicaid and Medicare recipients, not just those with developmental disabilities.

The HMA-Burns Rate Review Summary

BHDDH Workplans

RIDE Transition Action Plan Status

RIDE Transition Work Plan

BHDDH Communications Plan

Multi-Source Funding For Employment Services

Multi-Source Funding Graphic

Conflict-Free Case Management

DOJ, RI Spar Over Contempt In Olmstead Case

Federal Courthouse in Providence

By Gina Macris

The state of Rhode Island told a judge it cannot be held in contempt of a 2014 civil rights consent decree seeking to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities because of circumstances beyond the state’s control.

But the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says that the state has only itself to blame for its failure to comply.

The state’s “persistent choices to under-fund the system have created a dramatic provider shortage” that has left the target population isolated, the DOJ said in a counter-argument submitted Friday, Sept. 10, to the U.S. District Court.

The “refusal to adequately fund the Consent Decree is precisely the kind of self-imposed inability to comply” that undermines the state’s arguments in its defense, the DOJ said.

The decree stems from a 2014 finding by the DOJ that the state violated the Americans With Disabilities Act by relying too much on sheltered workshops paying sub-minimum wages and isolated day care centers, which kept people with disabilities out of mainstream society. The Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court has re-affirmed the rights of people with disabilities to receive support in their communities to give them a chance to live regular lives.

The DOJ further cites warnings of an independent court monitor a year ago that the state will be unable to comply with the consent decree by 2024 unless it came up with a multi-year plan to overhaul its developmental disabilities system, which for a decade has encouraged segregated care over integrated services. Such a plan has not been forthcoming.

The state’s lawyers, Marc DeSisto and Kathleen Hilton, submitted arguments Sept. 1 in response to a DOJ motion two weeks earlier that asked the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court to find the state in contempt of the consent decree and impose fines ranging up to $1.5 million per month. Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has scheduled a hearing the week of Oct. 18 through Oct. 22.

The state’s lawyers maintained the state could not meet benchmarks for integrated employment and other criteria because of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as resistance by adults with developmental disabilities themselves to work and non-work activities in the community.

But in its reply Sept. 10, the DOJ said the state’s characterization of the population “paints an inaccurate and offensive picture of people with developmental disabilities” and “reflects a profound misunderstanding of the nature, purpose, and obligations of the Consent Decree.”

DeSisto and Hilton, meanwhile, also argued that numerical targets for employment of adults with disabilities were not required by the consent decree, even though, as the DOJ said, documents show that state officials have admitted the opposite in numerous statements to the court since 2014, in writing or in person..

The state’s lawyers also maintained the state cannot be held in contempt until after the agreement expires on June 30, 2024 – an interpretation the DOJ said is unheard of in litigation involving system-wide reform.

In picking apart the state’s position over 28 pages, the DOJ said the state is urging the court “to adopt an interpretation of the consent decree that is “at odds with the decree’s text and purpose,” the DOJ said.

The state maintained the consent decree “imposed what could only be described as a cultural shock on the targeted community. After years of receiving services in “non-community” settings, “they are being told that their lifestyle must change,” the state’s lawyers said.

The DOJ disagreed. Rather than being told what they must do, the DOJ said, those eligible for services and their families have the right to make informed choices after receiving education and support about what working and enjoying leisure activities in the community might mean for them.

The state’s own data show that it “dramatically overstates” the resistance to integrated services, with 80 of 1,877 persons, or 4 percent, opting out of integrated services through a formal variance process, the DOJ said. And it cited a report from a court monitor in 2016 who had said he found “strong broad-based acceptance of the goals and desired outcomes of the consent decree.”

Similarly, the DOJ lawyers rejected the state’s argument that the COVID-19 pandemic prevented compliance with the annual employment targets in the consent decree. The pace of new job placements had slowed significantly more than a year before the onset of COVID-19, the DOJ said.

While the pandemic did make compliance more challenging, the state made “minimal efforts” to serve the consent decree population during the pandemic, the DOJ’s civil rights division argued.

“Given the availability of enhanced federal matching funds for providing integrated Medicaid services like those the Consent Decree requires, the State has the opportunity to increase funding for integrated employment services, provide the full amount of integrated day services to each target population member, and enhance wages to attract the required number of service providers,” the DOJ said. Its memorandum is signed by Rebecca B. Bond, chief of the DOJ’s civil rights division, as well as trial attorneys expected to litigate the case in October.

The state did earmark $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid money to raise the wages of workers and their supervisors by $2 to $3 an hour in the current budget, a roughly 15 percent increase, but only at the conclusion of court-ordered negotiations between state officials and providers.

DeSisto and Hilton, the state’s lawyers, also said the state is finalizing the language in a request for outside proposals “for evaluation and implementation of new rate and payment options for (the) Developmental Disabilities Services System.” The preparation for the request for proposals indicates that BHDDH plans to go out to bid through the state purchasing system, which can take several months.

The state last conducted a rate review in 2010 and 2011, but the General Assembly did not follow the recommendations of the consultant, Burns & Associates. Instead, it set dozens of reimbursement rates for private providers roughly 17 to 19 percent lower than Burns & Associates recommended, with the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) saying that it still expected providers to maintain the same level of service.

In November 2018, a principal in Burns & Associates, Mark Podrazik, testified before a special legislative commission that that a rate review was already overdue. Rates should be reviewed every five years, he said.

A few months later, BHDDH hired NESCSO, the nonprofit New England States Consortium Systems Organization, to analyze Rhode Island’s developmental disabilities system from top to bottom.

Although the NESCSO contract called for a rate review and analysis of alternatives to the state’s fee-for-service reimbursement system, NESCSO was asked to present options for change but to make no recommendations.

The BHDDH director at the time, Rebecca Boss, said the department wanted to expand its analytical capability and make its own choices going forward.

The 18-month contract, which cost $1.1 million, produced a final report and supplementary technical materials which, among many other things, said the provider system was significantly underfunded. Since the report was completed July 1, 2020, BHDDH has remained silent on its findings, and has not exercised options for renewal of NESCSOs services.

In their memorandum, the state’s lawyers said that “the intention of the rate review process is to strengthen the I/DD system and services provided to individuals, as well as to address provider capacity to deliver those same services. Thus, the State can and will at hearing clearly demonstrate that it has been ‘performing its obligations’ under the various sections of the Consent Decree.”

The DOJ has scoffed at that notion. The DOJ said in its original filing in August that it is prepared to show the “State failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation, and that the State failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.

DOJ Seeks Fines Up To $50K Daily For Rhode Island’s DD Consent Decree Noncompliance

By Gina Macris

The US. Department of Justice has proposed fines up to $1.5 million a month against the state of Rhode Island for failing to comply with a civil rights consent decree protecting adults with developmental disabilities during the last seven years.

The proposed fines are part of a preliminary filing in connection with a contempt hearing scheduled for mid-October by Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the U.S. District Court.

“The United States has sought for several years to work with the State regarding its noncompliance, to no avail,” said the DOJ lawyers.

In a memorandum to McConnell, the DOJ said that the state has fallen far short of numerical targets for providing services for integrating adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, both for employment and non-work activities.

Nor has the state kept its promise to provide adequate funding to maintain the number of agencies and workers needed to provide these services, the DOJ said. Then-governor Lincoln Chafee signed the consent decree April 8, 2014.

If necessary, the DOJ said, it will present evidence in October that state “failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation” and that it “failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.”

Those “rules and incentives” allude to Project Sustainability, a ten-year old fee-for-service reimbursement model that still allocates 40 percent of a recipient’s service hours to segregated, center-based care.

The DOJ said the court should “impose a reasonable fine on the state to incentivize it to rapidly come back into compliance with the Consent Decree, and to compensate for the state’s current underfunding of services.”

The proposed schedule of fines:

• $500,000 on the first day of the month for the first two months after a judicial finding of contempt.

• $50,000 a day, or about $1.5 million a month, beginning on the 70th day after a contempt order. The money would be deposited in a special fund to be used for consent decree compliance. The state should be prohibited from paying the fines out of any funding that otherwise would benefit Rhode Islanders with disabilities, the DOJ said.

McConnell has cleared the week of Oct. 18 through Oct. 22 to hear evidence in the contempt proceedings. The consent decree draws its authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, as reinforced by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

To help remedy any contempt finding and lessen fines, the state could increase the number of supported employment placements and expand the service hours of integrated daytime activities in accordance with the consent decree, the DOJ said.

In a separate step, the DOJ asked McConnell to order the state to prepare a plan for funding and complying with the consent decree before its term ends June 30, 2024. Such a document could help remedy the contempt and, with the court’s approval, could be incorporated in the existing decree.

By its own account, the state has missed its employment targets by more than a third for people in two categories of the consent decree population. They are the “Youth Exit” group, adults who left high school between 2013 and 2016, and the “Sheltered Workshop” group, those who once worked for subminimum wages in sheltered workshops, which were eliminated in 2018.

The chart below, from the state’s report to the court for the quarter ending March 31, shows employment in relation to the latest consent decree targets for a 12-month period. While part of the slow growth during 2020 might be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, the state had been falling further behind in previous years.

In another category, only 55 percent of adults are participating in integrated non-work activities in the community for slightly less than ten hours a week, on average, and only a fraction have a combined schedule of employment and other activities in the community filling more than 20 hours a week, according to the latest report of an independent court monitor, cited by the DOJ. In the consent decree, the state agreed to fund services for a total of 40 hours a week.

The DOJ also cited the monitor’s assessment that the state lacks the workers and the funding necessary to provide the services to comply with the consent decree.

Consultants from Approach Group, a Boston-based firm, have calculated the worker shortage at more than a 1000 of the 2845 direct care staff it said are needed to support Rhode Islanders with developmental disabilities in the community.

Separately, Approach Group and three other consultancy firms participated in 18-month, $1.1 million analysis of the developmental disabilities system commissioned by the state that found fiscal instability in the private provider system, which the state relies on for compliance with the consent decree.

The organizer of the four firms, the New England States Consortium Systems Organization (NESCSO), submitted its final report July 1, 2020, to the state Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH), laying out various options for alternatives to the state’s fee-for-service reimbursement system.

But the state’s subsequent budget deliberations did not address the NESCSO report or the needs it identified.

Instead, it appeared that BHDDH and Governor Dan McKee’s initial budget proposal responded to a directive from the Office of Management and Budget for a 15 percent budget reduction across the board.

In the end, Judge McConnell ordered state officials and providers to negotiate a wage hike in an effort to attract more workers.

As a result, the General Assembly set aside $39.7 million in the current budget for raises of $2 to $3 an hour for front-line workers and their supervisors, effective July 1. McConnell also has ordered that entry-level wages climb to $20 by 2024 to make Rhode Island competitive with neighboring states in what is a nationwide shortage of caregivers.

While the state is facing the prospect of hefty fines beginning as soon as November, BHDDH is seeking further study of the needs of adults with developmental disabilities.

Despite NESCSO’s detailed analysis and presentation of options for systems change, BHDDH reported to the court in July that “efforts are underway to draft an RFP (request for proposals) for a Systems Rate Review.

“The focus of this Rate Review will be to take an in-depth look at how services are funded in the Adult DD System to determine if the funding is adequate; if the appropriate services are being funded; and to look at new services categories,” the state’s report to McConnell said.

To read the DOJ’s proposed contempt order, click here.

To read the DOJ’s motion for contempt, click here.

To read the DOJ’s arguments for contempt, click here.

For charts supporting the DOJ’s arguments, click here.

Judge: RI Must Expand DD Budget Or Risk Olmstead Consent Decree Noncompliance

By Gina Macris

Judge McConnell

Rhode Island will not be able to meet a 2024 deadline for complying with a 7-year-old civil rights agreement unless it begins allocating money now to attract an adequately-paid, skilled workforce to serve adults with developmental disabilities in their communities.

So says Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court in a nine-page order issued March 16 clarifying what it will take to comply with a 2014 consent decree correcting Rhode Island’s violations of the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

Five days ago, on March 11, Governor Daniel McKee submitted a state budget request to the General Assembly that does not propose any rate increase for direct care workers. These workers are employed by the private agencies the state relies on to carry out provisions of the 2014 Olmstead consent decree.

Under the current rates, providers are able to pay front-line workers an average of $13.08 an hour, or $1.58 above the state’s minimum wage of $11.50, McConnell said in the statement, which amounted to a tutorial on the issues affecting compliance.

The $11.50 rate went into effect last October, and McConnell pointed out there are bills pending in the General Assembly for additional raises.

“The functions and responsibilities of staff who provide direct support to adults who have intellectual and developmental disabilities are significantly more challenging than many minimum wage positions,” McConnell said.

In several states the pay of direct support staff is considerably higher than minimum wage, he said. Utah, for example, has set its direct care rate at 72 percent above minimum wage.

He drew a straight line connecting low wages, high turnover, and an inability of the provider agencies to find a well-trained, stable workforce capable of providing an array of services that will enable adults with developmental disabilities to live meaningful lives in their communities in accordance with the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

One in five jobs in private agencies are currently vacant, and agencies report an average annual turnover of about 30 percent, according to a survey by an independent court monitor conducted in February. In addition, 80 percent of adults and families who direct their own programs said they had difficulty finding staff, and 68 percent said they had difficulty retaining staff, according to the monitor.

McConnell’s latest statement underlined an order he issued Jan. 6 which requires the state to raise workers’ wages to $20 an hour by 2024 as part of a comprehensive overhaul of services from center-based group care to one-on-one or one-to-two staffing in the community.

He said the state must collaborate with service providers and advocates in the community to develop a three-year budget strategy for compliance with the consent decree and give him monthly progress reports at the end of April, May, and June.

The judge cited a 2020 report of the state’s own consultants that concluded the provider agencies are financially “fragile and profoundly undercapitalized.”

McConnell also felt it necessary to say that the “entirety of the State” is a party to the consent decree, not merely the state agencies identified in the document.

The McKee administration and the leadership of the House and Senate had no immediate comment on McConnell’s order.

The judge reminded the state that the findings of the U.S. Department of Justice in 2014 cited “multiple concerns” about the state’s failure to comply with the Integration mandate.

Among them were:

• A lack of resources

• Failure of the state’s rate-setting methodology and reimbursement model to promote integrated supported employment and day services

• The inflexibility of the state’s reimbursement model.

McKee’s budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1 includes a proposed $15 million “transformation and transition fund,” but it’s not clear exactly what that money will pay for.

There are five committees already working under the supervision of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals on proposed administrative reforms.

But McConnell has signaled he wants the planning complete by the end of June and the implementation to begin at the start of the new fiscal year in July.

He also noted that the integration mandated by the consent decree are also required by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services if the state is to continue qualifying for federal Medicaid reimbursement under the Home And Community-Based Services (HCBS) Final Rule. Like the consent decree in Rhode Island, that rule gets its authority from the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 1999 clarified the Integration Mandate of the ADA.

“Rhode Island is seven years into the Consent Decree,” McConnell said. (The eighth year begins April 9.)

“With three years remaining, there is significant work still to be completed,” he said in conclusion.

Click here to read Judge McConnell’s order of March 16.

RI Faces High Cost For Fixing DD ADA Violations

By Gina Macris

After funding services for adults with developmental disabilities below their actual costs for nearly a decade, the state of Rhode Island is about to experience sticker shock.

The system of private agencies that provides most services for adults with developmental disabilities is on the verge of collapse, by all accounts, and a federal judge has given the state until Dec. 18 – five days from now – to come up with the money to keep it afloat until the next fiscal year.

The state also is under court order to devise and execute a plan for strengthening the system during the next three years so it can comply with a federal civil rights agreement that requires Rhode Island to integrate adults with developmental disabilities into community life by 2024. With the judge ready to use his power to enforce the consent decree, those costs could increase spending on developmental disability services by a third or more in the next several years.

Last month, a federal court monitor addressed the short-term fiscal gap by suggesting that the state release $2 million a month in unspent funds already allocated to developmental disabilities simply to keep the agencies’ doors open over the next six months. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced agencies to shrink services and drastically reduce billing.

Judge John J. McConnell, Jr.

In a recent hearing before Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court, a spokeswoman for service providers took a different approach, saying the state needs to immediately raise direct care pay, now an average of $13.08 an hour, to enable the private agencies to recruit and retain employees during the pandemic.

Roughly two thirds of these essential workers are women and more than half are people of color, according to the trade association spokeswoman.

A recently-completed report from the association, the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), fleshes out projected costs:

• An hourly increase of $2.32, to $15.50, would require nearly $44.1 million a year, or 16.4 percent more than the state has currently budgeted.

• A hike to $17.50 would mean an additional $79.8 million, or a 29.7 percent increase in the annual budget

• A $20 hourly rate would add $124.5 million to the budget. That would amount to a 46.4 percent increase in spending.

The report, “A System in Crisis,” said employers need to be able to offer $17.50 immediately to get job applicants in the door during the pandemic. In Fiscal 2022, which begins July 1, the rate should be increased again to $20 an hour.

Monitor’s Calculations More Limited In Scope

The monitor, meanwhile, agrees with the need for pay hikes, although he would allow the state more leeway on the timeline. In his latest report, filed with Judge McConnell Nov. 30, the monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, said the state should raise hourly wages to $17.50 “as quickly as possible” and to $20 by Fiscal 2024, which begins July 1, 2023.

A. Anthony Antosh

Antosh’s fiscal analysis focuses primarily on the changes needed in the final three years of the consent decree. He said there is consensus among various stakeholders with whom he has consulted that staffing and fiscal issues are the two main concerns in implementing the 2014 civil rights agreement.

“The state budget deficit resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic significantly complicates any fiscal analysis and any decision-making about budget planning,” he said.

Antosh makes no specific dollar recommendations but says that figures should be negotiated with provider agencies in a three-year budget plan to be completed in time to begin in the next fiscal cycle on July 1, 2021. He emphasized that the agencies provide 83 percent of the services necessary to support those protected by the consent decree.

Antosh said an ongoing review of the entire fiscal and reimbursement system, itemized in a 16-point court order issued by McConnell July 30, should be complete by June 30, 2021.

He also recommended that steps be taken now to make sure that the specific costs of a strengthened developmental disability system are acknowledged when future state budgets are being developed.

For example, the data on caseloads provided monthly by the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) to the General Assembly should be included in the Caseload Estimating Conference used to determine human service needs in the overall state budget. That is also one of the final recommendations of the “Project Sustainability Commission,” a a special legislative commission headed by Staite Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown.

While not acknowledging the actual costs, which pay for entitlement services under provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act, the General Assembly has often criticized the state’s developmental disabilities system for running over budget.

The governor typically relies on the November caseload and revenue estimating conferences to draw up the budget that is submitted to the General Assembly in January. The legislature, in turn, relies on more finely tuned caseload and revenue estimates in May to finalize a spending plan for the next fiscal year.

Monitor’s Numbers “Illustrate” Solutions

Antosh’s report includes five sets of fiscal projections that can best be described as starting points for discussion rather than cost estimates for system-wide change. For reasons related to the language of the consent decree, the monitor’s numbers cover individuals who were identified in confidential documents between 2013 and 2016 and today make up about 67 percent of the entire population with developmental disabilities.

Antosh said the tables of projections and descriptions of the associated costs “illustrate” various options in reconfiguring daytime services for the 67 percent.

The most comprehensive “illustration “ of the cost of re-inventing daytime employment and leisure activities for the specific portion of the population protected by the consent decree would add $35.6 million to the budget in Fiscal Year 2022, which begins next July 1, Antosh said. An additional $14.9 million would be needed in Fiscal 2023 and $15.8 million extra would be added in Fiscal Year 2024.

In addition to protecting a particular class of people, the consent decree is supposed to lead to a system-wide transformation. And state officials have made clear that they intend to include all people eligible for developmental disability services in a reformed system, not just those identified at the time of the consent decree.

The three increases projected by Antosh add up to about $66.3 million a year in three years’ time. Antosh said the increases need not all come from Medicaid funding but draw on a variety of other public and private sources.

The current annual approved budget for the private service providers is about $268.7 million in federal-state Medicaid funds, although the providers’ ability to bill for reimbursement has shrunk since the start of the pandemic.

Actual spending on privately-run services was about $240.8 million in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2019, according to state budget figures. Antosh said the increases need not all come from Medicaid funding but draw on a variety of other public and private sources.

CPNRI, meanwhile, offered estimates for system-wide reform that would not only increase wages but provide for more labor-intensive supports in the community in keeping with the requirements of the consent decree. The organization’s report said that at a direct care rate of $17.50 an hour, the more labor-intensive option would cost between $112.9 and $158.9 million, depending on the number of hours provided and other variables, including the level of independence of each individual as perceived by the state’s assessment tool.

CPNRI’s report incorporated work completed earlier this year by BHDDH consultants, as well as earlier projections done for the state by different consultants.

COVID-19 Exacerbates Inequities

The pandemic has highlighted the inadequacy of the poverty-level pay of direct care workers in the private sector. The average wage of $13.18 an hour falls below many entry-level jobs in retail, delivery, warehouse, restaurant and janitorial fields, according to the recent report from CPNRI.

That rate is also nearly $5 less than the $18 minimum hourly rate the state pays its own employees to do the same work, running a small parallel system of group homes for about 125 adults with developmental disabilities.

The years-long difficulties faced by providers in recruiting staff have reached critical proportions during the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving many individuals without services and crippling the agencies’ ability to generate income.

The crisis has been nine years in the making.

In 2011, the General Assembly devalued the private provider system when it adopted a new reimbursement model and budget cuts that were justified with an executive branch memo that simply said providers could deliver the same services with less money.

The $26- million budget cut resulted in layoffs and slashed wages. Entry-level positions for caregivers, once the starting point of a career ladder for caregivers who did not necessarily have college degrees, became minimum-wage, dead-end jobs.

At the time, the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities (BHDDH) ignored the recommendation of an outside consultant who said direct care workers should receive a minimum of $15 an hour within a year’s time.

The state pleaded poverty in the aftermath of the financial crash of 2008 and 2009, but by 2011, most other states were either holding steady on previous cuts or beginning to reverse reductions in human service spending, including those for people with developmental disabilities.

The austerity move accompanied a new reimbursement system billed as “Project Sustainability,” intended to equitably distribute available funds to eligible adults with developmental disabilities. The reimbursement model incentivized congregate care in sheltered workshops and day care centers – the least costly form of supervision. Subsequently, the DOJ found that an over-reliance on congregate care violated the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act. That finding led to the consent decree.

In a recent report, CPNRI said that COVID -19 has thrust a system developed and funded for congregate care into one that must deliver personalized services to mitigate infection among a vulnerable population.

Long-term effects of neglect on the system prevent providers from being “agile and responsive to meet the demand and needs of the community,” said the report. For example, the reimbursement model assumes that 40 percent of services will be delivered in center-based care, which is prohibited by public health concerns.

Read the court monitor’s report here.

Read the CPNRI report, “System in Crisis” here.

Olmstead Monitor: RI Needs Overhaul Of DD System To Comply With 2014 Agreement

By Gina Macris

During the next three years, Rhode Island must completely restructure its services for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and increase financial support accordingly to fully comply with a federal civil rights consent decree by the 2024 deadline.

A. Anthony Antosh

That is the conclusion of an independent federal court monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, in an Oct. 7 report to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court.

At McConnell’s direction, Antosh says he’s also working on a dollar figure for the cost of compliance, using an outside $1.1 million analysis of existing services commissioned by the state itself.

The state agreed, under the consent decree in 2014, to end its reliance on sheltered workshops and group day care centers and instead put adults with developmental disabilities in the driver’s seat when choosing a path in life, with an emphasis on regular employment and participation in community activities.

The last sheltered workshop closed in 2018, but many of the other goals of the consent decree have remained elusive, and Judge McConnell has grown impatient with a lack of funding he says is necessary to lay the foundation for compliance by the time federal oversight is scheduled to expire in 2024.

John J. McConnell, Jr.

“If anybody couldn’t tell, I am obsessed with the issue of funding as essential for us to get there,” McConnell said during a virtual hearing in July.

“If we don’t come up with a way to systemically support the (service) providers, then the whole thing will be meaningless,” McConnell said.

He has said he is prepared to tell the state to “find the money” to comply with the consent decree. State officials who control the purse strings must participate in the redesign of services, the judge has said.

In the most recent monitor’s report, Antosh set the tone for his recommendations by saying that compliance is “not found in a narrow analysis of the benchmarks of the Consent Decree, but is rooted in defining the structural changes that need to occur in order that the goals of the Consent Decree can be achieved.”

In bold print, he highlighted the fact that the outside analysis of the existing system found that most of the private service providers are “fragile and profoundly undercapitalized.”

In a separate report, the state responded to a court order that it address 16 fiscal and administrative barriers to the integration of people with developmental disabilities into their communities as mandated by the consent decree. The summary is the first of six progress reports the state must make to Judge McConnell by next June on its planning effort for long-range reform.

In its report, the state set a deadline of March, 2022 to overhaul its fiscal system. The changes include the elimination of three practices that for years have been identified as problematic by families and providers:

• staffing ratios that discourage community integration, so that in some cases, one worker must supervise up to five people on an outing, whether or not those people want to be there.

• documentation of staff time in 15-minute increments, which providers say diverts significant resources that otherwise could be used for direct services.

• Allocation of a certain percentage of services for segregated facility-based activities.

Alluding to the budget uncertainties caused by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the state’s seven-page summary cautions that the planning efforts are “dependent upon the continuation of current state staffing and budgetary levels.”

Monitor’s Budget For Reform Coming “Soon”

McConnell has asked Antosh to analyze current funding and make a dollars-and-cents recommendation for the cost of implementing the needed comprehensive changes.

Antosh said that report will be completed “soon.” He said he has begun that work, relying primarily on data drawn from an 18-month study done by the New England States Consortium Systems Organization (NESCSO) for the state’s disability agency.

The 143-page NESCSO study presented a number of findings and options for change but made no recommendations, at the behest of the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals.

Antosh said there is a need for systemic restructuring of existing services and supports, which are now “essentially based on group activities that occur in a blend of facility and community settings.”

The situation is exacerbated by a difficulty in recruiting and retaining high quality staff and by the COVID-19 pandemic, which in emphasizing the health risks of large gatherings has “reinforced the diminishing value of facility-based group services,” Antosh said.

The pandemic also has led to a setback in the progress made in the area of employment for adults with developmental disabilities. In June, as the state was beginning to reopen, only 31 percent of those who previously held jobs were still actively employed, Antosh said. (Some on furlough have since returned to work.)

Among work crews hired for large scale commercial cleaning or laundry operations and the like, only about half were working, he said.

The statistics underline a need for “new and intensified approaches to job development,” he said. “What is needed is a new model for providing supports that is more individualized, community based, and uses funds and supports from an increased variety of sources,” including the state’s Department of Labor and Training, Antosh said.

Family Hesitation About Integration

While the gears of state government are focused on moving Rhode Island into compliance with the federal government’s mandate of integrating individuals with developmental disabilities into the larger community, more than a third of the families with an adult son or daughter who would benefit say they oppose or are not yet convinced that the push toward employment is worthwhile.

The pandemic aside, significant numbers of families also express opposition or hesitation about their loved ones’ increased participation in community activities.

For Antosh, who included survey results of families as part of his report, the statistics underscore the need for adolescents to experience work-related and social activities in their communities as part of their education and for families to receive more information about the breadth of available opportunities.

It is perhaps most telling that among families of high school students, who are more likely than their older peers to have had internships and community experiences as part of their education, only 3 percent were opposed to jobs for their sons and daughters and 10 percent said they weren’t sure. Two thirds of families of adolescents said they believed the young people should have jobs as adults. Other parents of high school students – about one in five- said their son or daughter had to deal with other challenges before turning to employment. This is typically the case for those with chronic health problems.

Source: Monitor’s Report To U.S. District Court 10-7-20

The 2014 statewide consent decree draws its authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, which was reinforced by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court said that states must deliver services to all persons with disabilities in the most integrated setting that is therapeutically appropriate, and it presumed that setting to be the community.

In 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice found that the state violated the Integration Mandate by funneling high school students from segregated educational programs with low expectations to a lifetime of isolation in sheltered workshops and day care programs. In signing the consent decree, the state agreed to correct the violations by 2024. (A preliminary case against the state and the city of Providence in 2013 was merged into the statewide consent decree a year ago after Judge McConnell found the city and its school department had turned around a segregated high school program for students with developmental disabilities, leaving only the state as the defendant.

Antosh outlined several overarching features of successful implementation of the consent decree, including these:

• Each person will have the supports necessary to enjoy a self-determined, self-directed life based on work and non-work activities in the community.

• Private provider agencies will have the funding, staffing and other resources they need to meet the support needs of all persons receiving funding through the Division of Developmental Disabilities.

• Every adolescent and adult with intellectual or developmental disabilities will have the information and guidance they need to navigate a simpler and more efficient system of services.

• All adolescents and young adults leaving school will have had enough transitional work-related and non-work experiences in the community to make informed choices about jobs and careers, as well as a plan to direct their own programs or sign on with a provider organization.

Antosh recommended that the state develop a three-year budget strategy, beginning July 1, 2021, to “stabilize” developmental disability services and provide sufficient funding to implement the consent decree.

The monitor’s recommendations include a new, formal role for the Department of Labor and Training (DLT), which until now has not been a part of the multi-agency state team responsible for official responses to the court.

Antosh said DLT should immediately join BHDDH, the state Department of Education, the Department of Human Services, and the Executive Office of Health and Human Services in working on consent decree compliance.

DLT also should include all teenagers and adults with developmental disabilities in the workforce initiatives it administers, the monitor said.

By Jan. 1, 2021, the state should create an “Employer Task Force” to promote employment of those with developmental disabilities, Antosh said. The task force would identify relevant workforce trends and advise state officials and provider organizations about ways to reach out to prospective employers and offer employers incentives and support.

By April 1, 2021, the state must identify every possible source of funding that could support the consent decree and describe ways these sources can be “braided” to support the various requirements of the agreement.

As for private providers, the backbone of the service system, Antosh set a deadline of April 30, 2021 for them to develop action plans for the future. There are 36 provider agencies, most of them offering both day and residential services. In their plans, providers should redefine the support area that will be their focus, address consent decree issues, make budget projections and include internal quality improvement programs.

Just as the state has established five workgroups to address fiscal and administrative problems, Antosh recommended the state create additional issue-oriented work groups whose members are drawn from the ranks of state officials and community organizations, like the Employment Force Task Force.

One group would develop strategies to stabilize the workforce by increasing salaries, elevating professionalism through training, and creating a career ladder.

Other groups would address specific plans for:

• putting individuals at the center of mapping out long range and short-term goals for their future and strategies for achieving them

• ensuring young people have a smooth transition from high school to adult services,

• creating new models for providing services and supports for employment and community-based activities.

• enhancing the use of technology as a support strategy

• Developing alternative transportation options, including stipends that allow individuals to arrange their own rides

• Improving outreach to families, including those speak languages other than English and come from diverse cultures.

To read the full monitor’s report, click here. To read the state’s report, click here.

Photos by Anne Peters

Judge Signals Stepped-Up Oversight Of RI Olmstead Consent Decree

By Gina Macris

John J. McConnell, Jr.

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court is gearing up to order a soup-to-nuts overhaul of Rhode Island’s troubled developmental disability service system and he wants a detailed plan hammered out during the next year. 

Chronic problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic have pushed McConnell’s long-simmering concerns over the fiscal stability of developmental disability services “front and center,” as the judge put it during a public hearing in mid-May.

At that time, he asked an independent court monitor to recommend steps for ensuring the long-term survival of a reformed system that will be in full compliance with the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The proposed directive resulted from the monitor’s recommendations.

The order, sent to lawyers for comment earlier this month, says the state must fix systemic problems that pose “fiscal and administrative barriers” to compliance with a 2014 civil rights consent decree, which calls for integrated work and non-work activities based on a 40-hour week of services.

The barriers to compliance include the major pillars of a fee-for-service system the General Assembly enacted in 2011 that incentivized segregating adults with developmental disabilities in sheltered workshops and day care centers, in violation of the ADA’s Integration Mandate, according to findings of the  U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The Integration Mandate was re-affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1999 Olmstead decision.

Although the last sheltered workshops closed in 2018, some center-based day programs were still in operation before the pandemic hit.

Hearing Scheduled July 30

McConnell has given state and federal lawyers until July 30 to  tell him why his three-page directive should not move forward as a formal order, with a deadline of June 30, 2021 to develop a new system that meets the needs of the roughly 4000 individuals it serves.

Lawyers for the state and the DOJ have responded with an agreed-upon list of topics to be discussed at an upcoming hearing on the status of consent decree compliance.

The agenda, filed with the court July 23, said the state would address both long-term compliance with the consent decree and the immediate pressures posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the developmental disabilities system.

Specifically, the lawyers said they would present information on:

• Integrated employment and day services and the state’s phased reopening

• Support for providers and families during the continuing COVID pandemic

• Preparations for a potential second wave of the pandemic

• The fiscal issues and administrative barriers identified by the judge and a plan by the state to resolve them in phases, beginning with quarterly funding authorizations, staffing ratios, and the requirement to bill for daytime services in 15-minute increments.

Finally, the agenda said the discussion would include the state’s plans for substantial compliance with all requirements of the consent decree by 2024, the year it expires.

The judge’s proposed order would involve the state’s Medicaid administration, the Governor’s office, and the General Assembly in developing solutions to problems in the developmental disability service system and would require progress reports every two months between August 30 and June 30, 2021.

McConnell also wants the state to collaborate with families and providers in developing their plans.

McConnell is expected to take up the proposed order during the remote video hearing on July 30, beginning at 2 p.m. The public may sign in to attend no later than 1:45 p.m. through video or telephone, with instructions posted on the court’s public access web page, here.

COVID-19 Forced Near Shutdown Of Day Services

The coronavirus has hit hard at gains made in the number of regular jobs worked by adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities and the time they spend enjoying non-work activities as part of their communities.

A spokesman for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) indicated that about 35 percent of those who had jobs March 1 were still working at the end of May.

Non-work recreational and other activities also have been decimated, but no figures were available from BHDDH about the number of people who don’t have any daytime supports or can’t get the same number of service hours they had before the pandemic.

Parents expressed alarm about a lack of guidance on the resumption of services during a July 21 on-line forum hosted by the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI.)

Susan Willemsen, a parent, wrote in the chat box that accompanied the video meeting: “This is very scary, especially for the parents who need to work and your child does not understand the situation. It is very difficult to be home working 40 hours to survive and take care of a child who is 100% dependent on you. Trying to understand where we go from here.”

Tina Spears, executive director of CPNRI, said providers remain in a precarious financial position and called on the entire developmental disabilities community to press state and federal officials for more funding and priority status for group home operators to conduct on-site testing and gain access to personal protective equipment.

By all accounts, some three dozen private service providers licensed by the state to support adults with developmental disabilities were in tenuous financial condition before the coronavirus pandemic hit Rhode Island in March.

Coping with the pandemic has further exposed gaps in funding and service delivery, which in turn raise questions about the providers’ ability to survive long enough to benefit from a court-ordered restructuring without more immediate and urgent intervention. 

For example, the need for social distancing calls for one-on-one or small group staffing, preferably with the same clients consistently matched to the same support people. But the current funding structure typically will pay for six hours a week of one-on-one support, according to Spears.

Judge Spells Out Requirements

McConnell, meanwhile, indicated he wants change from the first moment an individual or family applies for services from the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD).

McConnell said there is a need to consolidate application procedures “for all pertinent RI services into one process.”  That includes streamlining the process for determining Medicaid eligibility and eligibility for developmental disability services, respectively, as well as any other state-funded supports a person might need.

Within the developmental disability service system itself, the judge wants the state to “review, address, and develop a strategy” for resolving problems in the following areas:

• The process and timeline for determining DDD eligibility and individual budgets, as well as the process and timeline in which individuals select private provider organizations.

• The process in which families and service providers appeal DDD’s decisions on eligibility, designated level of need, or funding level.

• The requirement that providers document each staff person’s time, in connection with each client, in 15-minute increments during the day as a condition of reimbursement.

• Reimbursements that are linked to specific staff-to-client ratios. McConnell didn’t spell out the details of how those ratios hinder integration, but one provider has offered a memorable example: The provider said the staffing ratios forced him to group together five clients with widely differing interests for job exploration in one community setting where he could supervise without help from another staffer. 

• Funding authorizations for each client that last only three months at a time, with no ability to carry forward any unused portion of the budget beyond the designated fiscal quarter. That feature, combined with the fee-for-service structure of the billing services, means that unless there is 100 percent attendance by all persons at all times, the spending ceiling can never be reached. A consultant’s study several years ago found that providers billed for an average of 85 percent of funding authorizations.

  The requirement that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, recognized as life-long conditions, must periodically re-establish their eligibility status for services.

McConnell also asked the state to come up with:

• A clear definition of functions and activities for which funding is permitted, along with the associated rates for each.

• Different funding levels for different activities that are “responsive to individual support needs.”

• Guidance on combining individual budgets at the request of the people involved

With the state shutdown beginning in March, service providers shifted their attention to the safety of those in group homes.

A total of 10 group home residents have died from COVID-19, according to a BHDDH spokesman. As of July 21, 161 group home residents had tested positive and a total of 48 had been hospitalized at one point or another. Five people were in the hospital on July 21, the spokesman said.

Spears, the CPNRI director, explained during the virtual public forum that providers have faced unprecedented costs in securing personal protective equipment for staff, carrying out aggressive cleaning protocols and paying for overtime, while being unable to bill the state for many services.

Providers did get some emergency federal assistance channeled through the state, albeit less than what was originally promised, to continue operations through periods of the highest risk and to give temporary pay raises to staff. But those supports have now ended, Spears said, and there’s “no grand way or plan forward” for moving the system to a new normal.

Spears said a top priority is permanent pay hikes for staff, who have been chronically underpaid and have “a thousand reasons” during the pandemic to stay home.

State officials are waiting for Congress to decide on a second stimulus package before moving ahead to set the budget for the current fiscal year. The pace of budget deliberations is expected to pick up in early August, said State Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, who is first vice-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

In a brief interview the day after the meeting, Spears said the imperative for moving forward with a plan for re-opening developmental disability services should flow from the state’s legal and moral responsibility, not the budget.

State officials can “sit in a holding pattern and worry about the budget all you want, but these are human lives we’re talking about,” she said.

Antosh Resolves Dispute Between RI and DOJ On Compliance With 2013 Sheltered Workshop Case

By Gina Macris

Federal court monitor A. Anthony Antosh has forged a resolution to a long-simmering dispute between the U.S. Department of Justice and the state of Rhode Island over the state’s compliance in connection with two civil rights decrees aimed at finding jobs for adults with developmental disabilities and otherwise integrating them in their communities.

The Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island announced that both the state and the DOJ have agreed to a detailed compliance road map crafted by Antosh in an order made public March 3.

In a separate order Feb. 28, the Chief Judge, John J. McConnell, Jr., announced he has elevated Antosh from interim to permanent status as monitor.

The judge’s March 3 order incorporated recommendations Antosh had previously submitted detailing the parameters for the state’s “substantial compliance” with a 2013 Interim Settlement Agreement (ISA), a total of 88 adults with developmental disabilities.

Antosh focused on 32 individuals who are either unemployed or working in non-competitive employment for a private developmental disability service provider. He enumerated a variety of services and supports which must be provided to these particular people, including new trial work experiences, more non-work activities in the community and a variety of specialized help to break down barriers like mobility issues, vision problems and behavioral challenges which hinder some people from getting around and looking for work.

Antosh extended the monitoring period from the ISA from July to December. To achieve compliance with the ISA, the state must show that 80 percent of the people in Antosh’s case studies are spending more time in the community, either for work or leisure. The ISA was originally scheduled to end July 1.

Antosh also said the existing funding does not go far enough, nor does it have the flexibility to meet the individual needs and preferences of persons protected by ISA, and by implication, a broader 2014 consent decree with a statewide reach.

The ISA and the statewide decree of 2014 both draw their authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, reinforced by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

In addition to requiring funding for specific services, consultations and technology on a person-by-person level, Antosh called for a re-calculation of the state’s existing funding mechanism for reimbursing private providers working with adults facing intellectual challenges.

While such a review is well underway and is expected to wrap up in June, it appears that the earliest the General Assembly would be able to enact any significant changes to the existing funding model would be in 2021, when the statewide consent decree will be in the seventh year of a ten-year enforcement period.

Most, if not all, of the 88 persons protected by the ISA are former students of the Birch Academy at Mount Pleasant High School in Providence. Many of them were funneled from Birch to a now-defunct sheltered workshop called Training Through Placement in nearby North Providence.

In introducing his study of the unemployed ISA population, Antosh noted that most of the people he interviewed could not answer his questions about their interests, the jobs held by relatives or friends, or if there was any kind of work they would like to try.

The answers provided evidence that these individuals had had limited life experiences, “one of the most common characteristics associated with individuals who have an intellectual disability,” Antosh said.

He said that “people do not choose what they do not know about,” which means that the individualized, or “person-centered” process of planning for job searches and other activities is not meaningful unless the person has had a “sufficient number of experiences of sufficient duration.”

This rationale underscored a requirement that each of the currently-unemployed persons have one or two trial work experiences, depending on whether they had previously had any community-based jobs, and that the state find the money to add the supports for these activities.

Since last July, the state had maintained that, because it has policies, practices and resources in place to satisfy the requirements of the 2013 ISA, it had met the compliance standards of the agreement, even if some of the 88 individuals in the protected class didn’t actually have jobs in the community as required.

But Antosh disagreed. He said that because the ISA population is “so small and so focused, the question of substantial compliance is about whether each and every individual has received supported employment services” and other necessary assistance.

Antosh said his study could not find any evidence the state is complying with one overarching requirement in the ISA, that it provide services for a total of 40 hours a week, including work and non-work activities in the community. The same requirement carries through to the statewide consent decree of 2014.

The state had said, in effect, that its best efforts to find jobs for the ISA population satisfied the requirements of the interim agreement, even though 15 former Birch students had never been employed outside of a sheltered workshop. The state has pledged to continue working with these persons.

But Antosh analyzed the barriers to employment listed by the state in these cases and made recommendation for ways the state can mitigate them:

For example, the state should provide:

• Up-to-date communications technology for people who have difficulty expressing themselves verbally

• Consultations with physical or occupational therapists for people who could benefit from better wheelchairs or other strategies for positioning their bodies.

• Access to tablets and other technology for those who want to do job searches or just stay in touch with the activities occurring in their communities.

• Assistance to service providers to develop strategies for reinforcing positive behavior for those who struggle with behavioral challenges. He said he found no evidence that these strategies were being used with the people who need them.

• Opportunities for conversations between families of persons with developmental disabilities who have had experience with supported employment and those who are resistant to the idea. Antosh said those who are resistant have expressed a willingness to listen to other families.

As for the state’s role in job searches, Antosh prescribed an approach similar to the “Real Jobs” strategies used by the state Department of Labor and Training, which starts with a survey of the needs in the business community and then tries to match individual interests and aptitudes with those openings, offering training to prepare potential job applicants.

The state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) has indicated it is close to announcing the third iteration of a targeted supported employment program that will focus on some 200 adults with developmental disabilities who have never had regular jobs. It is not clear whether the plans for the newest version of the so-called Person-Centered Supported Employment Performance Program will correspond to Antosh’s approach, which is now required by the Court.

Antosh plans to track increases in jobs and community activities during reviews in May and November to determine if the required services are in place for each person and whether there is a positive change in their engagement with the community.

Assuming that the state achieves compliance in December, there would be another year’s probation, through the end of 2021.

Antosh does not expect everyone who is either unemployed or not competitively employed to have a job in short order. In his report, he estimated that 9 of the 32 people on his list can be employed in a year’s time and that another two can find jobs within two years.

Judge Calls For Plan To Overcome Barriers In Implementing RI Olmstead Consent Decree

By Gina Macris

The Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island has ordered an independent monitor to bring him a new plan for implementing a 2014 civil rights agreement that seeks to integrate people with developmental disabilities in work and leisure activities in their communities by 2024.

With the state falling short of its job-placement goals in two of three categories in 2019, as well as other developments in recent months, indicators are mounting that the current approach isn’t working.

In an order issued Feb. 3, Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has charged the interim court monitor with gathering a wide range of data and information from multiple sources, including comments from people with developmental disabilities, their families and representatives of the community, as a baseline for discussions on the way forward.

McConnell gave the monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, until April 30 to complete the information-gathering process and until August 30 to complete the plan, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice, state officials and community representatives who serve on the Employment First Task Force, a committee created by the consent decree as an advisory group to government.

The judge went so far as to specify what agencies and officials Antosh should seek out, including “any interested legislators re: consent decree policies and funding.”

The process appears poised to capture the recent recommendations of a special legislative commission on the state’s fee-for-service funding system, as well as an ongoing rate review being conducted by outside consultants at the behest of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities, and Hospitals.

McConnell said he wants Antosh to identify:

• Policies, activities and funding needed to achieve substantial compliance by 2024

• Obstacles and barriers to full implementation

• Service gaps that might hinder full implementation

• Structural components for a compliance plan

• Criteria for substantial compliance

The standards for compliance have become a matter of debate between lawyers for the DOJ and the state in the context of a prototype for the 2014 consent decree, the so-called Interim Settlement Agreement (ISA) of 2013, which affects about 88 former sheltered workshop employees who once attended the Birch Academy at Mount Pleasant High School and later worked at the now-defunct Training Through Placement.

The city of Providence was released from federal oversight in connection with the ISA last September in unusually celebratory courtroom proceedings, with accolades from all sides on the way it has changed the culture at the Birch Academy and turned around the lives of students.

But the performance of the state on implementing the ISA has not received such rosy reviews, an indication it is struggling with the consent decree as well.

In the ISA, the city and its school department have been responsible for opening the doors to integration through inclusive classes and internship programs, while the state has been charged with picking up where the educational system leaves off, to match individuals with jobs and help them participate in activities of their choice in the community. The state’s role in the ISA mirrors its relationship to school departments throughout Rhode Island in the consent decree, except on a broader scale.

Statewide, the number of adults with developmental disabilities who s must be offered employment by 2024 currently totals 1,987, according to the state’s latest consent decree data. That number is a little more than half the population protected by the consent decree.

After five years and nine months of the decade-long enforcement period of the consent decree, a total of 894 people, or 45 percent of the target number, have landed jobs, the state said in a report that captures progress through December 31, 2019.

The state exceeded the cumulative goal for employment in 2019 by more than 100, but missed targets in two subgroups, named “youth exit” and “sheltered workshop,” labels chosen to reflect whether individuals were young adults who had recently left school or working in enclaves at the time the consent decree was signed.

The state has never met the job targets for the “youth exit” group, which also represents the segment of the population that is applying for adult services for the first time, often from agencies that are hard-pressed to meet the needs of existing clients, let alone take on new ones.

In a third group labeled “day program” to describe those in day care centers in 2014, the number of new jobs recorded through 2019 rose to 385, or 160 over the goal, enough to overcome the shortfall in the other two categories.

But the the pace of new jobs has slowed. There were only 14 new job placements statewide for the last quarter of 2019 and 74 for the entire year. The remainder of the new jobs were recorded in previous years.

State of RI graphic representation of cumulative employment totals by quarter in 2019 under terms of Consent Decree

State of RI table of cumulative employment totals, by quarter, in 2018 and 2019 under terms of Consent Decree

One group not counted in the target population for employment is “youth in transition,” a total of 1,201 high school students with developmental disabilities, or 32 percent of the entire class protected by the consent decree. Many of them are expected to enter the labor market in the next several years.

Last fall, within the limited scope of the ISA, Antosh’ predecessor as court monitor, Charles Moseley, found that the state has made considerable progress in improving the lives of former Birch students – but not enough to warrant the end of federal oversight.

McConnell asked Antosh to review materials developed by Moseley, which include a 70-page exhaustive assessment of the state’s performance in meeting dozens of specific standards in the ISA.

In a draft report, obtained by Developmental Disability News, Moseley said the state has made considerable progress in changing the lives of the nearly 90 people still protected by the ISA, – but not enough. He completed the report at the end of September.

Moseley said the state fell short in several key areas:

• The number of people it had connected with jobs

• The number of hours logged by the job holders, some of whom said they wanted to work more

• The degree to which non-work activities in the community promoted interactions with non-disabled people

• The specificity and sense of purpose in the written short-range and long-term goals and supports that are supposed to fit together in a cohesive career development plan tailored to the individual

In a notice to Judge McConnell submitted in late December, the DOJ said that while the state “made initial progress in implementing the Agreement’s provisions, recent monitoring has showed that the state’s efforts have stalled such that it may not independently act to achieve the requisite outcomes before the Agreement ends.”

In its reply, the state acknowledged that it had not found jobs for 15 members of the protected class but said the barriers included health and behavioral problems, family resistance, and other issues.

The agreement itself says that “substantial compliance is achieved where the State and City have implemented all of the provisions of the Interim Settlement Agreement for all individuals in the Target Populations.”

In the context of that language, the state lawyers maintained that implementation means it has “mechanisms and/or policies” in place to carry out any of the specific requirements of the agreement, whether or not a particular numerical target is reached, as long as the “Court is satisfied that the State is on track to reasonably reach the requirement.”

Those who don’t want jobs can file for an exception, or variance, with the monitor, but Moseley said he had not received any such requests from the 87 members of the protected class. The state’s lawyers said officials wanted to keep working with the 15 unemployed persons rather than have them opt out of the search for employment.

Moseley’s report goes into great detail in evaluating the state’s performance on dozens of standards, many of them bureaucratic, that are nevertheless important for creating a high quality system of social services designed to sustain itself after the consent decree is long gone.

Among other things, the standards cover multiple aspects of:

• quality improvement

• detailed data collection

• benefits counseling for job seekers so that they know how earned income will affect their government disability payments, if at all

• the clear communication of each person’s short-term and long-term objectives in detailed career development plans

• staff training

In several areas, Moseley said he did not find enough documentation or evidence to make an assessment, although the state says it has supporting materials to show it has met the standards in question.

For example, Moseley said he didn’t have enough information to determine whether the state is following proven, or “evidence-based”, practices in its approach to employment supports for adults with developmental disabilities.

He also said the state hadn’t given him enough documentation to show whether the private agencies delivering services have the wherewithal, or capacity, to serve adults with developmental disabilities as required by the ISA.

Both Moseley and Antosh are experts in the research on supporting adults with developmental disabilities.

Antosh wrote the proposal that established the federally-funded Sherlock Center on Disabilities at Rhode Island College and served as its director from its inception in in 1993 until October, 2019.

Moseley, a former director of Vermont’s developmental disability system, worked as a top official in the national association of state developmental disability directors before he became the court monitor. Moseley stepped down for health reasons at the end of September.

New Olmstead Consent Decree Monitor Wants Reality Check On RI DD System Transformation

A. Anthony Antosh * Photo By Anne Peters

By Gina Macris

As the new federal monitor of a 2014 civil rights consent decree affecting Rhode Islanders with developmental disabilities, A. Anthony Antosh wants to get a reality check on where reform efforts now stand and to create a road map for what remains to be done to enable people to live inclusive lives, in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Olmstead Decision on the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Antosh’s vision, which parallels the requirements of the consent decree is that:

• Adults with developmental disabilities who once spent their days in sheltered workshops or day care centers will have a chance to work at regular jobs and will be able to do whatever non-work activities they want in the community- with the needed supports.

• Teenagers and those in their early twenties still in school, who are also protected by the consent decree, will get the services they need to make a smooth transition to the world of work and adulthood.

The process for assessing how far the state has moved toward inclusion includes not only a look at the state’s compliance with the consent decree’s prescribed goals, or “benchmarks,” but at the impact on the people’s lives as well, Antosh said.

For example, the state’s “Person-Centered Supported Employment Performance Program” tries to boost the number of people who get hired to bring the state into compliance with target job numbers specified in the consent decree. Antosh says he wants to find out if meeting those target employment numbers also means that everyone who wants to work has a chance to get a job.

Antosh outlined his vision at a Dec. 17 meeting in Warwick with the Employment First Task Force (EFTF), a community-based committee empowered by the consent decree to serve as an advisory group to state government and federal officials.

After his appointment as monitor by U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., Antosh said, “a lot of people wanted to give me advice but lots of people felt their voices had not been heard. I want them to be heard.”

Antosh said he can’t process calls and emails from all of the thousands of Rhode Islanders with a stake in developmental disability services, but over the next couple of months he wants to hear from as many people as possible.

He turned to EFTF to help him collect and analyze the information in the next few months because its 15 members have broad and deep connections to the various constituencies with a connection to the developmental disability service system as consumers, families or professionals.

The EFTF membership represents non-profit organizations like the RI Developmental Disabilities Council, the Sherlock Center on Disabilities at Rhode Island College, Advocates in Action, Disability Rights Rhode Island, and includes a delegate from the state’s special education directors, the leaders of a statewide developmental disability professional organization, family members with ties to advocacy groups, service providers and adults who themselves receive state supports.

In the next two months, Antosh said, he wants the EFTF members to ask these questions of their constituencies:

• Has life improved as a result of the consent decree reforms already in place?

• What changes must yet be made?

• What will a transformed system look like to them?

Right now, Antosh said, he could go around a room and get a different answer from everyone on “where we are now.”

“I want many data points to know it has changed,” said Antosh, drawing on his background as a researcher and educator in developmental disability and special education issues. Antosh was the original director of the Sherlock Center at Rhode Island College, serving from 1993 until two months ago (check.)

Early in his career, he was one of the plaintiffs the lawsuit that forced the state to close its institution for people with disabilities, the Ladd School. It was shuttered in 1994. And the judge who now presides over the consent decree case, John J. McConnell, Jr., was a young lawyer who represented the plaintiffs in the Ladd school suit, Antosh among them.

Antosh said he has consulted with McConnell on his grass roots, fact-gathering approach. He said he will “do nothing without consultation with the judge.”

McConnell appointed Antosh interim court monitor November 25 to end a stalemate of more than four months between the state and the U.S. Department of Justice on the selection of a replacement to the original consent decree monitor, Charles Moseley, who stepped down for health reasons.

At the EFTF meeting, Antosh, now entering his 51st year in the disabilities field, outlined some of his core beliefs:

• Equity. If an opportunity is available to one, it should be available to all, he said.

• Policy backed by research. He said he has seen well intentioned people putting forward well-intentioned policies which have no impact on people’s lives because there’s no research or evidence to indicate they will work.

• Individualization. Antosh said he has seen many plans for an individualized program of services with information on the goals but no steps outlined on how those goals should be reached. “I believe in real plans,” he said.

• Individual control. People with developmental disabilities and their families can spend their allocation much better if they control it, Antosh said.

Overall, Antosh signaled that he wants flexibility in the system to enable the individualization that is at the heart of the consent decree. “I struggle with rigid anything,” he said.

Judge Closes Nation's First "Sheltered Workshop" Case Early, Citing Great Strides in Providence

Etta Carmadello, Special Education Director for Providence Schools, is interviewed outside U.S. District Court Sept. 26. Onlookers, left to right, are Christopher Coleman, principal at Mount Pleasant High School; Lisa Vargas-Sinapi, Carmadello’s predecessor in the director’s post; Linda Butera Noble, former Director of Community Services at the Birch Academy at Mount Pleasant High School; and Mary Ann Carroll, the lawyer representing the city of Providence. Carroll credited Vargas-Sinapi, Noble and Carmadello in providing critical leadership that ultimately brought a landmark civil rights case against the city to a close. All photos by Anne Peters.

By Gina Macris

The U. S. District Court in Rhode Island has approved an early conclusion to the nation’s first “sheltered workshop” civil rights complaint, brought six years ago against the city of Providence, with federal officials praising the swift, comprehensive, and lasting efforts at Mount Pleasant High School to transform the lives of its students with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“The hard, tedious work you did has really had a positive effect on people’s lives,” said Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. in a hearing Sept. 26, addressing a packed gallery in a small courtroom filled with state, city, and school officials involved with developmental disability services.

When the U.S. Department of Justice first investigated in 2013, lawyers found the Birch Academy in an isolated classroom in the basement of Mount Pleasant High, where students “collated jewelry” in a sheltered workshop setting that served as a “pipeline” for a lifetime of such work, said DOJ lawyer Victoria Thomas.

The 2013 civil rights agreement in Providence, based on the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, was the first in the nation to address the rights of individuals with developmental disabilities to live, work, and play in their communities under the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

Today, students attend classes integrated with their typical peers. They receive services designed to help them identify and develop their own interests and skills and to try them out in two 60-day work experiences before they graduate, Thomas said. She said those internships are “life-changing” for some people. For example, Miriam Hospital has offered permanent jobs to several Birch graduates.

Mary Ann Carroll, a lawyer representing the city, said that at the outset, former schools superintendent Susan F. Lusi took swift action in empowering the redesign of the Birch program in the summer of 2013, a job that has involved changing the mindset of staff and “parents who thought that a sheltered workshop was appropriate for their children.”

Judge McConnell, in dismissing the case nine months ahead of schedule, said he imagined that resistance was similar to what he encountered decades ago as a lawyer for activists seeking to close the Ladd School, the state’s now-defunct institution for people with developmental disabilities.

“Change is hard when it has to do with human beings – how they perceive themselves and how others perceive them,” he said.

He said he tells own children that he wants them to be “problem-solvers and not problem identifiers.”

“It’s good to see public servants be problem-solvers,” McConnell said.

McConnell asked if either the DOJ or an independent court monitor had any concerns about maintaining the changes at Mount Pleasant in light of the takeover the Providence school system by the state Department of Education.

The “thought of stalling or going backward is unacceptable,” the judge said.

The monitor, Charles Moseley, said he has not spoken to state education officials about the takeover.

But Thomas, the DOJ lawyer, said she had read the outside report which prompted the state to move ahead with the takeover and found “no overlap” between the faults it found in the district as a whole and the compliance efforts at Mount Pleasant High.

Charles Moseley, Left, and Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., in the Judge’s Chambers After Court Sept. 26

Carroll, the city’s lawyer, said the changes have been made in such a way that she does not feel they will “evaporate.” Emphasizing the teamwork of key leaders in the school department and the support of current and former mayors, she said she hopes the successes at Birch can serve as a model for other cities and school departments around the country.

“The message I want people to take away is that when we work together, we can make things happen,” Carroll said.

Moseley himself is leaving the monitor’s post, but his successor will continue to keep tabs on Mount Pleasant as part of another case which grew out of the initial “Interim Settlement Agreement“ of 2013.

At least three departments of state government still have obligations under a broader, statewide consent decree signed in 2014 to bring integration into services for all Rhode Island public high school students with developmental disabilities. Once they become adults, the state must help them find regular jobs and engage in community activities. The statewide consent decree remains in effect until 2024. The Interim Settlement Agreement was to have expired July 1, 2020.

A spokeswoman for the state Department of Education affirmed its commitment to continuing the reforms at Mount Pleasant in keeping with the 2013 interim agreement and the subsequent statewide consent decree, in response to a recent question from Developmental Disability News.

The Providence school department “will be expected to continue to meet the decree requirements, and our agency will continue to provide support and technical assistance to the entire state to ensure that our school communities are meeting the Employment First policy,” said spokeswoman Meg Geoghegan.

The Employment First Policy, which has been adopted statewide, assumes that all adults with disabilities can work in the community, in keeping with the Integration Mandate of the ADA.

The end of federal oversight at Birch, which over the years has involved between 51 and 65 students at any one time, also has marked the end of Charles Moseley’s role as the independent monitor. He announced in July that he planned to step down at the end of September, citing health concerns.

The consent decree gives the state and the DOJ 30 days after they receive a letter of resignation to reach agreement on a new monitor. If they can’t agree in that time frame, according to the consent decree, each side is to submit the names of up to three candidates to the judge, who will make the decision.

In response to recent questions from Developmental Disability News, a spokesman for the state Executive Office of Health and Human Services said: “DOJ and the state continue to work collaboratively on the selection process for a replacement monitor and have kept the Court aware of their work in this important decision.”

DOJ Urges End To City’s Obligations In Landmark Providence "Sheltered Workshop" Case

By Gina Macris

The U.S. District Court will hear a request by the City of Providence and the U.S. Department of Justice for early termination of a civil rights agreement affecting intellectually challenged students at Mount Pleasant High School who were once trained only to perform repetitive tasks in a sheltered workshop.

The hearing was scheduled for Sept. 26 after the DOJ formally signaled its support for the city’s request, saying the city and its school department have transformed services for students in keeping with the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

“Students are now integrated with their classmates and receive services to prepare them for integrated work in careers that match their interests and abilities,” said lawyers for the DOJ.

In accordance with the agreement, “the City will ensure that these changes are lasting,” the DOJ said in written arguments urging Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. to dismiss the case against the city.

The DOJ praised the city’s “rapid implementation” and “consistent adherence” to the provisions of the agreement, saying it has resulted in “substantial compliance” a year ahead of schedule. The government’s conclusion concurs with a recent report filed by an independent court monitor.

“This is a victory for all involved,” the DOJ said.

The DOJ lawyers pointed out that “this agreement was the first in the nation to address the rights of individuals with disabilities to receive integrated employment services instead of segregated workshop services.”

The DOJ did not address the city’s compliance in the context of the impending state takeover of the city’s school system. The request for early dismissal was made last winter - months before the appointment of a new state Commissioner of Education, who received a devastating outside evaluation of the school system from the Johns Hopkins Institute for Educational Policy.

The agreement, signed in 2013, is due to expire on July 1, 2020. It served as a prototype for a subsequent statewide consent decree signed in 2014 which obliges the state to provide transition services to students with developmental disabilities in all high schools across Rhode Island and to transform all work and non-work adult services to comply with the ADA’s Integration mandate, which has been affirmed by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

An early dismissal of the city’s obligations under the 2013 Interim Settlement Agreement (ISA) would mean that the city would no longer have to prepare for frequent calls and periodic visits from the monitor and the DOJ lawyers, or to file detailed and time-consuming quarterly reports documenting its compliance efforts. But court retains jurisdiction for a year after the expiration date, according to the DOJ.

Granting the city’s request would not affect the state’s continuing obligations for former Birch students who were sent to the now-defunct sheltered workshop, Training Through Placement, which used the Birch Academy as a pipeline for workers. Nor would it curtail the state’s responsibilities for other adults with developmental disabilities throughout Rhode Island who must have access to integrated work and non-work services under provisions of the separate 2014 consent decree.

The two agreements have fostered an “Employment First” policy, which assumes that all adults with developmental disabilities can work at regular jobs in the community. The policy encompasses self-employment and customized employment, which involves cooperation by employers motivated to re-order established job descriptions to get important tasks done by reliable employees. (Exceptions to the “Employment First” policy are allowed on a case by case basis.)

The DOJ said an independent court monitor, Charles Moseley, has found in a recent report that the city has met or exceeded standards for 45 compliance measures in four categories:

• Career development and transition planning

• Trial work experiences

• Training, outreach, and education about integrated employment for school staff, students and families

• Interagency coordination

School personnel have prepared students to obtain competitive employment as adults through “person-centered” planning, which begins by highlighting each student’s individuality; as well as detailed career development plans and vocational assessments, the DOJ wrote.

Moreover, the city’s efforts have extended to former Birch students who left school as early as 2010. The city has undertaken “significant efforts” to locate them and provide vocational assessments, supported employment services and other assistance to help them find integrated employment. The city has reached nearly 50 former students.

“As noted by the court monitor, this ‘look back’ strategy to correct past discrimination showcased the city’s commitment to the objectives of the ISA,” according to the DOJ.

The government lawyers also agreed that the city provides high quality trial work experiences that are individualized and integrated in the community. The agreement requires that every student have two such internships, each one lasting 60 days, before leaving school.

The city “repeatedly went the extra mile to ensure students’ individualized needs were met” and has satisfied the monitor’s concerns about the few cases in which students lacked a second internship, the DOJ said.

Teachers and other professionals working with students participate in frequent training and have “consistently demonstrated their ability to implement the requirements and goals of the ISA, breathing life into the city’s Employment First Policy,” the DOJ said.

The lawyers cited improvements in the school department’s cooperation with state agencies, including regular consultation with a rehabilitation counselor from the Office of Rehabilitation Services and monthly meetings between the city’s special education director and state officials to review the progress of former students who are receiving adult services.

The city’s swift progress in implementing the agreement and “years of sustained reform” have resulted in a myriad of changes in policy, operations, and attitudes that will be “difficult to dismantle,” the DOJ wrote.

And the success of the ISA, “including considerable outreach and education to students, families, and the community, has spread awareness and the expectation that students with IDD are capable of working in integrated settings with services,” the lawyers wrote.

The DOJ noted that Birch students will continue to benefit from the state’s obligations under the 2014 statewide consent decree, which requires students with developmental disabilities in all Rhode Island high schools to receive transition services similar to those developed through the ISA. The statewide decree is to expire in 2024.

The Sept. 26 hearing before Judge McConnell is scheduled for 10 a.m.

Read the next article (below) for monitor Charles Moseley’s assessment of the city’s compliance efforts under the Interim Settlement Agreement.

In addition, click here for an article on a public discussion of the pros and cons of early termination of the city’s obligations.