DOJ, RI Spar Over Contempt In Olmstead Case

Federal Courthouse in Providence

By Gina Macris

The state of Rhode Island told a judge it cannot be held in contempt of a 2014 civil rights consent decree seeking to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities because of circumstances beyond the state’s control.

But the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says that the state has only itself to blame for its failure to comply.

The state’s “persistent choices to under-fund the system have created a dramatic provider shortage” that has left the target population isolated, the DOJ said in a counter-argument submitted Friday, Sept. 10, to the U.S. District Court.

The “refusal to adequately fund the Consent Decree is precisely the kind of self-imposed inability to comply” that undermines the state’s arguments in its defense, the DOJ said.

The decree stems from a 2014 finding by the DOJ that the state violated the Americans With Disabilities Act by relying too much on sheltered workshops paying sub-minimum wages and isolated day care centers, which kept people with disabilities out of mainstream society. The Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court has re-affirmed the rights of people with disabilities to receive support in their communities to give them a chance to live regular lives.

The DOJ further cites warnings of an independent court monitor a year ago that the state will be unable to comply with the consent decree by 2024 unless it came up with a multi-year plan to overhaul its developmental disabilities system, which for a decade has encouraged segregated care over integrated services. Such a plan has not been forthcoming.

The state’s lawyers, Marc DeSisto and Kathleen Hilton, submitted arguments Sept. 1 in response to a DOJ motion two weeks earlier that asked the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court to find the state in contempt of the consent decree and impose fines ranging up to $1.5 million per month. Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has scheduled a hearing the week of Oct. 18 through Oct. 22.

The state’s lawyers maintained the state could not meet benchmarks for integrated employment and other criteria because of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as resistance by adults with developmental disabilities themselves to work and non-work activities in the community.

But in its reply Sept. 10, the DOJ said the state’s characterization of the population “paints an inaccurate and offensive picture of people with developmental disabilities” and “reflects a profound misunderstanding of the nature, purpose, and obligations of the Consent Decree.”

DeSisto and Hilton, meanwhile, also argued that numerical targets for employment of adults with disabilities were not required by the consent decree, even though, as the DOJ said, documents show that state officials have admitted the opposite in numerous statements to the court since 2014, in writing or in person..

The state’s lawyers also maintained the state cannot be held in contempt until after the agreement expires on June 30, 2024 – an interpretation the DOJ said is unheard of in litigation involving system-wide reform.

In picking apart the state’s position over 28 pages, the DOJ said the state is urging the court “to adopt an interpretation of the consent decree that is “at odds with the decree’s text and purpose,” the DOJ said.

The state maintained the consent decree “imposed what could only be described as a cultural shock on the targeted community. After years of receiving services in “non-community” settings, “they are being told that their lifestyle must change,” the state’s lawyers said.

The DOJ disagreed. Rather than being told what they must do, the DOJ said, those eligible for services and their families have the right to make informed choices after receiving education and support about what working and enjoying leisure activities in the community might mean for them.

The state’s own data show that it “dramatically overstates” the resistance to integrated services, with 80 of 1,877 persons, or 4 percent, opting out of integrated services through a formal variance process, the DOJ said. And it cited a report from a court monitor in 2016 who had said he found “strong broad-based acceptance of the goals and desired outcomes of the consent decree.”

Similarly, the DOJ lawyers rejected the state’s argument that the COVID-19 pandemic prevented compliance with the annual employment targets in the consent decree. The pace of new job placements had slowed significantly more than a year before the onset of COVID-19, the DOJ said.

While the pandemic did make compliance more challenging, the state made “minimal efforts” to serve the consent decree population during the pandemic, the DOJ’s civil rights division argued.

“Given the availability of enhanced federal matching funds for providing integrated Medicaid services like those the Consent Decree requires, the State has the opportunity to increase funding for integrated employment services, provide the full amount of integrated day services to each target population member, and enhance wages to attract the required number of service providers,” the DOJ said. Its memorandum is signed by Rebecca B. Bond, chief of the DOJ’s civil rights division, as well as trial attorneys expected to litigate the case in October.

The state did earmark $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid money to raise the wages of workers and their supervisors by $2 to $3 an hour in the current budget, a roughly 15 percent increase, but only at the conclusion of court-ordered negotiations between state officials and providers.

DeSisto and Hilton, the state’s lawyers, also said the state is finalizing the language in a request for outside proposals “for evaluation and implementation of new rate and payment options for (the) Developmental Disabilities Services System.” The preparation for the request for proposals indicates that BHDDH plans to go out to bid through the state purchasing system, which can take several months.

The state last conducted a rate review in 2010 and 2011, but the General Assembly did not follow the recommendations of the consultant, Burns & Associates. Instead, it set dozens of reimbursement rates for private providers roughly 17 to 19 percent lower than Burns & Associates recommended, with the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) saying that it still expected providers to maintain the same level of service.

In November 2018, a principal in Burns & Associates, Mark Podrazik, testified before a special legislative commission that that a rate review was already overdue. Rates should be reviewed every five years, he said.

A few months later, BHDDH hired NESCSO, the nonprofit New England States Consortium Systems Organization, to analyze Rhode Island’s developmental disabilities system from top to bottom.

Although the NESCSO contract called for a rate review and analysis of alternatives to the state’s fee-for-service reimbursement system, NESCSO was asked to present options for change but to make no recommendations.

The BHDDH director at the time, Rebecca Boss, said the department wanted to expand its analytical capability and make its own choices going forward.

The 18-month contract, which cost $1.1 million, produced a final report and supplementary technical materials which, among many other things, said the provider system was significantly underfunded. Since the report was completed July 1, 2020, BHDDH has remained silent on its findings, and has not exercised options for renewal of NESCSOs services.

In their memorandum, the state’s lawyers said that “the intention of the rate review process is to strengthen the I/DD system and services provided to individuals, as well as to address provider capacity to deliver those same services. Thus, the State can and will at hearing clearly demonstrate that it has been ‘performing its obligations’ under the various sections of the Consent Decree.”

The DOJ has scoffed at that notion. The DOJ said in its original filing in August that it is prepared to show the “State failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation, and that the State failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.

"Significant" Raises Proposed For RI DD Workers After Court-Ordered Talks

By Gina Macris

RI Governor Dan McKee’s proposal to raise wages from $13.18 to $15.75 an hour for caregivers of adults with developmental disabilities might prevent a widespread worker shortage from getting worse.

But those who have had the frustrating experience trying to recruit and retain workers at the current lower rate told the House Finance Committee June 10 that the proposed raise, while significant, will not be enough to ease the labor crisis that prevents the state from complying with a 2014 civil rights consent decree affecting adults with developmental disabilities.

Other advocates made the broader statement that that paying a living wage to caregivers of all vulnerable populations is a moral imperative. Raising pay to attract more workers also is essential to guaranteeing the civil rights of vulnerable people, no matter what their disability, they said.

The Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, (ADA), reinforced by the 1999 Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, says that those with disabilities have a right to receive the services they need to live regular lives in their communities.

If the state does not adopt a comprehensive Olmstead plan to provide integrated, community-based services to all people with disabilities, it will remain vulnerable to more litigation like the ADA complaint of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) which led to the 2014 consent decree, said a spokesman for the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council.

As it is, Rhode Island’s Director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities acknowledged at the House Finance Committee hearing that the state has a “difficult relationship” with the U.S. District Court and the DOJ over the status of implementation and the unfinished work ahead as the agreement nears its conclusion in 2024.

I/DD Population Sitting At Home

Seven years after Rhode Island signed the consent decree, agreeing to end the segregation of sheltered workshops and day care centers, many adults with developmental disabilities are no better off.

For example, Jacob Cohen of North Kingstown, who once had a full schedule of activities in the community, now gets only three hours a week of support time, his father, Howard, told the Finance Committee in written testimony.

At AccessPoint RI, a Cranston-based service agency, 50 of 109 supervisory and direct care jobs are vacant and 60 out of 160 clients are not getting any daytime services, according to the executive director.

The consent decree calls for 40 hours a week of employment-related supports and other activities in the community.

A consultants’ report commissioned by providers says the private service providers lack 1,081 of the 2845 full time direct care workers they need to carry out the requirements of the consent decree. COVID-19 exacerbated the workforce shortage but did not cause it, the consultants said. The consultants said that depending on living arrangements, persons with developmental disabilities have experienced a reduction in services ranging from 49 percent to 71.6 percent, with those in family homes having the severest cutbacks.

The McKee administration’s proposed $15.75 hourly reimbursement rate would represent a wage hike of about $2.50 or more for direct care workers – roughly 20 percent.

The state does not set private-sector wages directly but reimburses the private agencies for wages and employment-related overhead, like taxes and workers compensation. Some providers pay a little more than the current hourly minimum of $13.18, by subsidizing wages with revenue from other types of services.

In addition to raising direct care worker pay, the proposal would raise reimbursement levels for supervisors’ wages from $18.41 to $21.99. There would be no raises for support coordinators or job developers, who are paid $21.47 an hour. Nor would those in a catch-all “professional” category receive a pay increase. They are paid $27.52 an hour, according to a presentation the House Fiscal Advisor made to the Finance Committee.

The overall wage increase would cost a total of $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid funding, including $16.8 million in state revenue and $22.9 million in federal reimbursements.

Of the state’s share of the cost, $13 million would be re-directed from a $15 million “transition and transformation fund” for developing systemic reforms aimed at quality improvement and the reimbursement model that pays private providers. The reimbursement model was redesigned a decade ago to favor segregated care and has not been fundamentally changed since then.

Robert Marshall, the spokesman for the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council, warned that gutting the so-called “transition and transformation fund” could heighten the state’s non-compliance with the consent decree and leave it open to additional federal action.

House Fiscal Office

With the governor’s proposed raises included, the allocation to the private developmental disabilities system would jump from $260.3 million in federal-state Medicaid funding in the current fiscal year to $297.7 million, an overall increase of $37.4 million, according to the presentation of the House Fiscal Officer, Sharon Reynolds Ferland.

Tina Spears, executive director of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), a trade association which negotiated the wage hike with the state, called it a “notable first step in rebuilding the workforce serving people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.”

SPEARS CPNRI

“This wage increase will improve the lives of both those who do the work and the families who are served by that work,” she said in written testimony.

But Spears, who had pressed for a rate of $17.50 an hour, told the committee that the state’s final offer of $15.75 does not make it competitive in attracting new workers.

Complicating the salary issue, the administration expects the private agencies to accept group home residents from the state-run developmental disabilities system, which it plans to phase out. The current allocation of $29.7 million for state-run group homes, named Rhode Island Community Living and Supports (RICLAS) would be cut to $9 million in the next budget.

Both the unions representing RICLAS workers and the private providers have expressed skepticism that the privatization is feasible.

The budget calls for the reduction of 50 RICLAS positions. RICLAS pays workers a starting rate of about $18.55 an hour, more than $5 above the current entry-level pay in the private system, and about $2.80 above the proposed new private-pay rate.

On July 1, minimum wages in Connecticut will increase to $16.50 an hour for private-sector direct care workers in the first year of a two-year contract between that state and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The rate will jump to $17.25 on July 1, 2022.

Massachusetts will pay direct care workers at privately-run agencies a minimum of $16.10 an hour beginning July 1, the final year of a three-year contract with another branch of the SEIU, according to a salary schedule on a Massachusetts state website related to “personal care attendants.”

Massachusetts already siphons off some of Rhode Island’s best caregivers, said Michael Andrade, President of CPNRI and CEO of Pro-Ability at the Bristol County ARC.

Ruggiero Capitol TV

During the hearing, Rep. Deborah Ruggiero asked Jonathan Womer, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), to tell her who has been leading the state’s response to the consent decree during the last few years and explain why there has been “so little progress.”

She also wanted to know why she’s hearing reports that the state is “not in very good standing” with the Court or the DOJ and what is being done to change that situation.

Womer introduced Kevin Savage, who has been in charge of the Division of Developmental Disabilities since last July.

“While we haven’t met a number of benchmarks for getting people to work” in the community, Savage said, “there are no longer any sheltered workshops in Rhode Island.”

SAVAGE

“That’s a major achievement of the consent decree,” Savage said. He added that because of the pandemic, meeting goals for employment and community integration has been “extremely challenging,”

During state budget preparations, which began last fall during great economic uncertainty, OMB asked state agencies to submit proposals with 15 percent reductions in their spending plans. The economic outlook has brightened considerably since then.

In January, Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court said Rhode Island must raise direct care wages to $20 an hour by 2024 to attract more direct care workers to Rhode Island providers, who do the work in the field necessary to enable the state to comply with the consent decree.

Two months later, in March, the governor submitted a budget proposal that offered no raises. Then came court-ordered negotiations, which resulted in the administration’s proposal for the $15.75 rate, as well as a separate budget amendment that would comply with another court order, making the developmental disabilities caseload part of formal, consensus-building state budget preparations in November of this year.

During the budget hearing, Savage said, “We are having a difficult time in our relationship with the Court. We do want to repair that.”

“We have tremendous respect for the judge and tremendous respect for the court monitor. We work with some of the best providers you can work with, so it’s really not a matter of not wanting to work with the providers or the court monitor,” Savage said.

The negotiations took too long, he acknowledged.

“We need to pick up the pieces and move forward faster,” he said, engaging the community “much more robustly than we have.”

“We need to get to get to $20 by 2024,” to “stabilize the workforce,” and make other reforms as part of a court ordered, comprehensive three-year compliance plan, he said.

Rep. Alex Marszalkowski, D- Cumberland, chairman of the Human Services Subcommittee of the House Finance Committee, asked why the wage increases would apply to group home workers when the consent decree is limited to issues related to daytime services.

Savage responded that “if we stabilize one part of the workforce, we destabilize the other; the only path is to stabilize the entire system.”

Emphasis on Civil Rights

Later in the hearing, Spears, the CPNRI director, emphasized that hard-working caregivers deserve a living wage and noted that “civil rights protections” are at the heart of the 2014 consent decree. “It’s essentially a corrective action plan to resolve civil rights violations and make sure they never happen again,” she said.

She added: “We are seven years into a ten-year agreement, and there is a tremendous amount of pressure from the Court and the U.S. Department of Justice to achieve the established benchmarks.” As it now stands, the private sector cannot deliver on the compliance the state needs, Spears said.

The Chair of the Long Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC) and the representative of the Developmental Disabilities Council each applied a broader perspective on the budget amendments, saying the General Assembly must address the workforce and quality-of-life issues across all vulnerable populations.

Maureen Maigret, chair of the LTCCC, recommended the General Assembly use some of the current Medicaid reimbursement rate, enhanced under provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act, to raise the wages of direct care workers funded by Medicaid’s Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) to the same level proposed for those working in developmental disabilities.

“The issues facing other types of home and community-based services and residential programs are similar to providers of services for persons with developmental disabilities,” Maigret said in written testimony, citing low wages, high turnover and staff burnout, all exacerbated by the pandemic.

“And we know that almost a majority of these workers are women and persons of color whose value has historically been under-valued,” Maigret said.

“Efforts to achieve wage parity for all direct care staff working in government-subsidized Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) is imperative if the state is to have a quality and accessible LTSS (Long Term Services and Supports) system with appropriate options for persons needing care,” she said.

Marshall, of the DD Council, said Rhode Island could use some of the one-time stimulus funding under provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act to develop an Olmstead plan, a multi-year blueprint for conforming to requirements of the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

Only seven states — Rhode Island among them - still lack such a plan, he said.

Because of the Olmstead decision, Medicaid changed the rules of Home and Community-Based Services programs to help vulnerable persons live as independently as possible at home or in home-like settings.

Marshall said Rhode Island has been in violation of Medicaid’s regulations on home and community-based services since 2014 and is “vulnerable to yet another Department of Justice lawsuit or ineligibility for federal Medicaid match.”

Proposed $10M Cut In RI DD Spending Overshadows Reform Plans

By Gina Macris

Thursday’s initial briefing on Governor Daniel McKee’s proposed budget for adults with developmental disabilities highlighted a $15-million set-aside to plan changes in the system, in response to a federal court order enforcing a 2014 civil rights consent decree.

At the same time, the budget legislation submitted to the General Assembly later in the day, on March 11, shows that overall spending on developmental disabilities would be $10 million less than spent this year.

McKee proposes adding $476,573 to the current developmental disabilities allocation for a total of nearly $304.5 million in federal and state Medicaid money and miscellaneous other sources of funding to close out the current fiscal year June 30.

The budget bill for the next fiscal year cuts overall spending on developmental disabilities to $294.4 million. That total includes $5 million in federal funds and $10 million in state revenue earmarked in the budget for the $15-million “transformation and transition fund” to plan reforms to comply with the consent decree.

The spending cut reflects projected savings from phasing out the costly state-run group home system. Residents would be moved to less costly group homes run by private service providers, according to the budget plan.

But the private agencies, who were in a precarious financial position even before the onset of the COVID pandemic a year ago, have been reluctant to take on additional clients in recent years because the amount the state pays does not cover the actual cost of services, according to repeated testimony before House and Senate finance committees, as well as testimony in federal court.

The state’s own consultants, the non-profit New England States Consortium Systems Organization, highlighted the providers’ fiscal problems and the way the demands on them strained capacity as part of an exhaustive 18-month study completed last summer for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

The core long-term problem, exacerbated by COVID-19, is an inability to find workers for jobs that carry a high degree of responsibility but provide an average starting wage of about $13.18 an hour, less than some fast food and retail chains and less than Amazon, according to testimony before Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the U.S. District Court.

McConnell, who enforces compliance with a 2014 civil rights decree requiring the integration of adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, has ordered the state to raise workers’ wages to $20 an hour by 2024 as part of a comprehensive three-year overhaul of the developmental disabilities system.

The state budget indirectly controls how much the private providers can pay their workers by setting reimbursement rates for various services, but no money in McKee’s proposal is carved out for a rate increase.

Nor does it appear the McKee administration anticipates the heightened level of spending in the next several years that would support the kind of investment needed to comply with requirements of the consent decree to accommodate clients’ desire to be part of their communities, at work and at play. The consent decree gets its authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

McKee’s budget summary anticipates costs for developmental disabilities services will increase 4 percent annually through 2026.

A 4 percent annual increase would come nowhere close to fulfilling the court-ordered hourly wage of $20 an hour which, according to one estimate, would require an budget hike exceeding 45 percent.

The budget summary indicates the state aims to save a net $11.4 million by transferring the operations of the state-run group home system to the privately-run system by October 1.

The state-run system, called Rhode Island Community Living and Supports, (RICLAS) is currently allocated $29.7 million to care for 116 group home residents. The budget summary says transferring RICLAS operations to the private group home system would save $19.2 million in federal-state Medicaid funds in the RICLAS account in the fiscal year beginning July 1.

At the same time, a total of $7.8 million would be added to the private provider system to care for the former RICLAS residents. The budget for the next fiscal year would still leave about $9 million in RICLAS through June 20, 2022. A BHDDH spokesman could not immediately say how long the RICLAS phase-out would take.

The $19.2 million cut in RICLAS would eliminate the equivalent of 50 full-time jobs, mostly from attrition or transfer, the BHDDH spokesman said. RICLAS caregivers are paid a minimum of $18 and receive state employee benefits.

The last time BHDDH announced plans to move large numbers of people in residential care, in 2016, it achieved only a small fraction of the savings the Office of Management and Budget had calculated.

Of 100 persons projected to move from group homes to less costly shared living arrangements in private homes during the first six months of 2016, only 21 made successful matches with families.

Instead of projected savings of $19.3 million, the state recouped a few hundred thousand dollars in that six-month period.

Between March, 2016 and July, 2020, the number of people in shared living arrangements increased from 288 to 399. Since then, the number has decreased to 378, according to BHDDH figures.

The $15-million transformation and transition fund would support a policy and planning effort to carry out reforms required for compliance with the consent decree, according to the budget bill.

BHDDH informed Judge McConnell in February that the changes would take 18 to 24 months to implement, with a target date of December, 2022.

According to the budget language, the fund will be dedicated to:

• Help providers “strengthen” their operations to “support consumers’ needs for living meaningful lives of their choosing in the community”

• Allow providers the chance to participate in a performance-based payment model

• Reduce administrative burdens for providers

• Invest in “state infrastructure” to implement and manage these initiatives

• Prepare for a new way of approaching budgeting of the developmental disabilities caseload in the future.

Beyond the language in the budget bill, there were no details immediately available from BHDDH on what the transformation and transition fund will pay for.

RI Governor's DD Budget Would Add $8.7 Million in Medicaid Funding For Wages, Higher Costs

By Gina Macris

Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo’s recently released budget proposal would add nearly $8.7 million in new funding to the system of privately-run services for adults with developmental disabilities in the next 17 months, through June 30, 2020.

Most of that overall $8.7-million-increase, $6.4 million in federal and state Medicaid money, would fund raises for workers of some three dozen private agencies that provide developmental disability services under contract with the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

The raises would take effect July 1. Funding for the added wages - an estimated 44 cents an hour – is carved out in the budget bill for Fiscal Year 2020 that Raimondo has submitted to the General Assembly.

The budget bill also requires that almost $1.6 million in federal-state Medicaid funds be earmarked for technical assistance to private providers changing from segregated care to community-based, integrated service to comply with a 2014 federal consent decree.

The current overall spending level for developmental disabilities, $271.7 million, would increase to $273.1 million for the budget ending June 30. In the next fiscal cycle beginning July 1, the spending ceiling would rise to nearly $280.9 million, including federal, state and miscellaneous sources of revenue.

The Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) draws more than half the resources assigned to BHDDH – which is currently budgeted for a grand total of almost $422.5 million. Under Raimondo’s plan, the bottom line for the entire department would grow to about $448.5 million in Fiscal 2020 – an increase of $26 million, including about $19.7 million in supplemental funding for the existing budget.

Developmental disability services are financed through the federal-state Medicaid program, with the federal government paying nearly 53 cents on the dollar.

The governor’s executive summary, however, tends to focus on the state outlay alone. It says $3.1 million in state funds would be earmarked to cover an existing deficit and an additional $3.3 million would be set aside in the fiscal year beginning July 1 for increased caseload costs.

Those budget items, combined with the state’s share of the $6.4 million proposed wage increase - $3 million – add up to $9.4 million, nearly twice the overall $5 million in new state tax dollars that Raimondo would apply to developmental disabilities for the remainder of the current fiscal year and the next one.

The state would have to use savings in other areas to fully fund Raimondo’s plan for developmental disabilities, but neither the budget language nor the governor’s narrative spells out which cost-cutting measures would fill the gap.

The first-quarter spending report for BHDDH put the projected deficit in developmental disabilities at a total of $7.6 million for the current fiscal year, including federal and state funding.

The updated report for the second quarter will not be ready until Jan. 31, according to BHDDH officials.

But at a recent press briefing on the budget, Rebeca Boss, the BHDDH director, said she is satisfied that the governor’s proposal will enable the department to balance its current budget.

Among other things, the plan would restore money in the current budget that the DDD otherwise would have saved if it had won federal approval for a “Health Home,” a Medicaid option featuring a managed-care approach that also provides for a third-party to coordinate services for individuals.

The Health Home would help DDD comply with a Medicaid rule for Home and Community Based Services which requires case management to be separate from funding or service delivery. Currently DDD is responsible both for funding and for case management, which Medicaid perceives as a conflict of interest.

Boss said BHDDH has not yet submitted an application for a Health Home option for developmental disabilities. The budget assumes that a health home plan for developmental disabilities will be approved and go into operation during Fiscal 2020, which begins July 1.

Medicaid will reimburse 90 percent of the state outlay for health homes for a maximum of two years. After that period, the reimbursement rate for health homes will drop back to the regular rate for Rhode Island, whatever it may be at that time..

To help close the current deficit, the governor recommended an additional $273,412 in state revenue for BHDDH to pay homemaker licensed practical nurses who work with adults with developmental disabilities. The Executive Office of Human Services granted them a slightly higher pay increase than BHDDH had budgeted and the General Assembly had approved.

In adding $3.3 million in state revenue for “caseload” expenditures for the 2020 fiscal year, Raimondo’s executive summary said she “accepts the Department’s (BHDDH’s) most up to date projections” on costs, “ensuring no changes to services for DD consumers and continued financing to improve achievement of consent decree mandated services.”

Last year at this time, Raimondo had proposed cutting a total of more than $18 million in federal-state funding from developmental disability services, with a spokeswoman for the Office of Management and Budget saying the proposed reduction was based on calculations made from “estimated growth rates in the cost of providing services.” She did not elaborate.

Raimondo, pressed by the independent court monitor overseeing the implementation of a 2014 federal civil rights consent decree, eventually restored the funding and pledged the state’s support of the work ordered by the federal court.

The consent decree requires Rhode Island to correct violations of the integration mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, reinforced by the 1999 Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, by ending its over-reliance on sheltered workshops and segregated day care.

This year, according to Boss, BHDDH submitted cost projections on the basis of actual claims, as directed by the Executive Office of Health And Human Services, rather than individual funding authorizations.

In the process of updating projections, the data was refined to remove claims that had been double-counted on Medicaid rolls of both BHDDH and EOHHS, according to the executive summary of the budget.

For Fiscal 2020, the governor’s budget summary highlighted three additional areas for savings:

• ·A continuation of “residential rebalancing”, a multi-year effort to reduce the number of people in group homes, a cost-saving measure that also is intended to provide more “community-based placements such as shared living.” The budget projects $1.5 million in “residential rebalancing” in 2020.

• Closure of one state-operated group home for an estimated savings of nearly $92,000. The staff in that location will move to other sites, reducing the need for overtime in the state-run system.

• So-called “right sizing” of staffing at the state-run group home system to realize additional projected savings of $202,721. “Right-sizing” means staffing patterns will be reassessed and employees will re-bid jobs. This change is expected to reduce overnight staffing and further reduce overtime costs.

RI House Speaker And Senate President Both Support Higher Pay For DD Workers

By Gina Macris

The top two leaders in the Rhode Island General Assembly say they support the idea of increasing the pay of workers who provide services for adults with developmental disabilities.

“I am very supportive of the developmentally disabled community,” said House Speaker Nicholas A. Mattiello, “and I believe those people who care for them should receive a rate increase. The House of Representatives will certainly strongly consider such a request in next year’s budget deliberations.”

Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio is likewise supportive, a spokesman said.

“The Senate President supports increasing wages for providers of services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities,” Ruggerio’s spokesman said, adding that “Senator Louis DiPalma (D-Middletown) has provided extraordinary leadership on this issue, including a proposal to gradually increase wages for providers, and the Senate President supports his initiative.”

Whether Governor Raimondo will consider increasing funding for the private system of care for adults with developmental disabilities in her budget proposal for the next fiscal year remains to be seen. Her office has not responded to a Nov. 20 email seeking comment on possible pay increases.

Developmental Disability News asked the state’s leaders whether they would consider re-visiting reimbursement rates after Mark Podrazik, the president of the healthcare consulting firm Burns & Associates, told a Senate commission chaired by Senator DiPalma that a review of pay hikes is warranted.

DiPalma’s commission is studying the current fee-for- service system, called Project Sustainability, which Burns and Associates was instrumental in developing seven years ago. While the consultants took the lead in the project design, the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) disregarded the actual reimbursement rates the firm proposed, instead reducing most of them by 17 to 19 percent before forwarding the final version of the plan to the General Assembly in the spring of 2011.

Burns & Associates recommends a rate overhaul once every five years, Podrazik told the commission Nov. 13. After nearly seven and a half years, “it’s past time,” he said.

Podrazik testified that Project Sustainability was shaped by the state’s drive to control costs, but by that measure, the system has failed.

The developmental disability budget repeatedly has run over the limits set by the General Assembly, and the gaps have only increased during the last few years as the U.S. District Court has enforced a federal civil rights agreement with the state that requires Rhode Island to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities.

That approach, necessary to correct violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, costs more than the reliance on sheltered workshops and segregated day centers codified in Project Sustainability.

DiPalma, the chairman of the Project Sustainability commission, takes exception to a view that the developmental disability services program has been overspending.

“If the budget was unrealistic from the get-go, you’re going to exceed that budget,” he said at the commission meeting Nov. 13. He has studied developmental disability service budgets for ten years, he said, and none of them have been realistic.

Increasing wages for direct care workers “needs to become a priority” for a number of reasons, DiPalma said in a telephone interview. “If it’s a priority, we’ll find the money.”

In 2016, DiPalma called for a $15 hourly wage for direct care workers by July 1, 2021, but now he says “we need to get there faster.”

And he indicated he no longer believes $15 is enough. For example, Massachusetts, an easy commute from many places in Rhode Island, is already paying that amount to members of the Service Employees Union International who work with persons with disabilities. A bill signed by Governor Charles Baker in June put Massachusetts on a path to a $15 minimum wage in five years.

At one time, those who worked with adults facing intellectual and developmental challenges had full time jobs with benefits. But Project Sustainability resulted in drastic cuts to wages and benefits that destabilized the workforce, forcing many to leave the field or to take two or three jobs to make ends meet.

Turnover averages about one in three workers a year, and employers are unable to fill one in six jobs, according to the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, a trade association. At the same time, the demands of the consent decree require more highly skilled staff.

Since July 1, 2016, the General Assembly has enacted two relatively small pay increases for direct care staff and their supervisors at private agencies serving adults with developmental disabilities, but the average pay, $11.36 an hour, is still two dollars less than the hourly rate of $13.97 which Burns & Associates recommended in 2011.

RI DD Services Get A "Status Quo" Budget, But Can It Keep Up With Client Needs And Consent Decree?

By Gina Macris

With Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo signing the $9.6 billion budget bill into law June 22, the service system for adults with developmental disabilities averts a crisis in the fiscal year beginning July 1, and instead continues the status quo.

That is to say, the system is still struggling to meet the needs of some 4,000 Rhode Island adults with developmental disabilities, including those who are seeking services for the first time.

Higher-than-expected revenue estimates in May enabled the House and the Senate to restore a number of reductions in the human services which Raimondo had proposed in January, including about $18 million in developmental disabilities.  On June 20, the Senate ratified the House version of the budget and sent it to the governor.

Until the state’s intent to restore the funds for developmental disability services became clear in mid-May, an independent federal court monitor had been preparing to make recommendations to U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. for an order to ensure adequate funding..

It was the second time since a federal civil rights consent decree was signed in 2014 that a court order, or the threat of one, has surfaced during the budget-making season at the State House. There’s no reason to believe that the monitor won’t re-visit that idea next year if funding for developmental disability services fails to keep pace with the stepped-up demands of the consent decree, which requires the state to shift from segregated services to those offering integrated, community-based opportunities by 2024.

One goal illustrates the challenges. The state is to have part-time jobs by Sept. 30 for all young adults who left high school between 2013 and 2016 and who who want to work, but with three months remaining until the deadline, those with jobs number 235, or 55 percent, of a population of 425, according to figures released last week.

The budget does include $1.5 million in technical assistance for private providers of developmental disability services trying to adjust to integrated services for clients, according to Carmela Corte, the chief financial officer of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH). Those are federal-state Medicaid dollars that will be taken from the allocation for direct services.   

A relatively small number of adults with developmental disabilities who choose to use their funding authorizations from BHDDH for in-home care will be able to pay workers 10 percent more, which amounts to about $620,000 in the budget, Corte said.

By The Numbers 

The General Assembly also adjusted the current budget to close out the fiscal year, adding about $15.6 million to cover an operating deficit as recommended by Raimondo, who acknowledged the shortfall deficit as a one-time event.

The overall numbers in developmental disabilities:

•     $272.1 million for Fiscal 2018, which ends June 30    
• ·   $271.4 million for Fiscal 2019, which begins July 1

Administrators, however, tend to work on a day-to-day basis with an “operating budget,” which includes only federal and state Medicaid funds available for providing direct services.

For the current fiscal year, federal-state Medicaid dollars are budgeted at $269.8 million.  For the fiscal year beginning July 1, the federal-state Medicaid total is $269.2 million.

No Raises For Frontline Workers

One big-ticket item missing from the next budget is a pay increase for employees of private service providers who work directly with adults with developmental disabilities.  The underpaid workforce is sure to be a major issue for advocates when the General Assembly reconvenes in January.

Incremental raises for these workers during three budget cycles have allowed them to keep just ahead of the minimum wage, in a range which puts private service providers in competition with the same pool of workers as fast-food restaurants and other retail businesses. 

Including the most recent raises, in 2017, the average direct care worker is paid about $11.50 an hour. The minimum wage, which increased from $9.60 to $10.10 on Jan. 1, is due for another bump, to $10.50, on Jan. 1, 2019.

Before the General Assembly cut $26 million from the developmental disabilities budget in 2011, the average pay at some private agencies serving adults with developmental disabilities averaged close to $15 an hour, with comprehensive health insurance and other benefits.  Career ladders afforded front-line workers opportunities for advancement.

Since then, the workforce has become unstable, with employers unable to fill one out of six jobs, according to the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, a trade organization. Turnover ranges from about 30 percent to about 75 percent, depending on the agency. In some cases, workers leave direct care work for other jobs with similar pay but much less responsibility. In other cases, they leave for the same type of work at better pay in Massachusetts, which is scheduled to offer a minimum of $15 an hour for such work July 1.

Budget Questions At Public Forum

The issue of worker pay surfaced at a public forum hosted by the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) June 18 at the University of Rhode Island, with one parent lamenting the lack raises in the year ahead.

Kerri Zanchi                         Photo By Anne Peters

Kerri Zanchi, Director of Developmental Disabilities, and other staff of the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH), explained various aspects of the budget and outlined initiatives intended to help the service system in the long run.

Asked whether the “status quo” funding approved by the General Assembly would result in cost overruns in the coming fiscal year, Zanchi didn’t say.  Instead she emphasized that DDD must use its data “every single month” to support its projections and “really understand what our needs are going to look like.”  

But BHDDH projections of need for developmental disability services don’t figure in the semi-annual Caseload Estimating Conference that comes up with figures for Medicaid entitlement costs.

And the state Budget Office does not take actual costs into account in making recommendations to the governor, a spokeswoman said earlier this year.  Rather it uses “estimated growth rates in the cost of providing services,” according to Brenna McCabe. She did not say who makes the estimates or otherwise elaborate.

The new budget doesn’t allow for increases in individual funding authorizations – one of the chief causes of the cost overruns which prompted the BHDDH request for additional funding in the budget cycle now winding down.

The governor cited higher “acuity” in acknowledging that increased per-person costs fueled a projected $15 million deficit in developmental disability costs in the fiscal year ending June 30. That factor, however, was ignored in her presentation of Fiscal 2019 budget that begins July 1.

Ever since November, 2016, there has been an upward trend in individual authorizations, something  that is expected to continue for several years, until all clients have been evaluated at least once using a revised standardized interview that is considered more accurate than the previous one. Both the original interview, called the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS), and the revised one, called the SIS-A, were developed by the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.  

Budget Language Opens Door To Innovation

The budget contains language that responds in to a variety of concerns about who manages resources available to adults with developmental disabilities and how providers are paid. 

It gives BHDDH the required state legislative authority to apply for a so-called “Health Home” and an “Alternate Payment Method” to create pilot programs for changes in case management and provider reimbursement better suited to integrated, community-based services that are tailored to individual preferences and needs, as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hold that neither the states, as funding authorities, nor the services providers themselves can also be responsible for designing and managing individualized programs of activities without conflicts of interests.

States should have another disinterested party in the role of case manager, according to CMS.

The Health Home is the CMS name for the third-party case management organization that would oversee individual clients’ Medicaid and Medicare services, while the Alternate Payment Method allows states to explore changes to the usual fee-for-service reimbursement to private providers.

 Zanchi and Kimberly Reynolds, BHDDH administrator of financial management, explained the goals of the applications at the public forum June 18.

Reynolds described the Health Home as a “one-stop shop where individuals and families may get assistance in managing their services.  BHDDH has three health homes, mostly in the substance abuse and mental health areas.”

By way of background, Zanchi said that the idea for applying for a Health Home grew out of collective thinking in DDD during the last year about ways to put its clients in the driver’s seat in shaping their activities, or as she put it, developing “person-centered practice.”

For one thing, the system can’t be truly “person-centered” without case management that is free of conflicts of interest, Zanchi said.

She also said a pilot program for an Alternate Payment Method might generate solutions to problems faced by the current fee-for-service reimbursement system, which poses challenges to providers trying to get their clients into the community in meaningful ways.

The fee-for service system requires providers to bill in 15-minute increments, but only when a client is actually receiving services. It doesn’t allow providers to plan ahead, because reimbursement depends on day-to-day attendance at a particular activity, without exceptions for occasions such as client’s medical appointments, illnesses, or vacations.

As the state moves to a system with greater consumer control and consumer empowerment, Zanchi said, providers will need to be able to count on more staff to get their clients into the community.

Despite the consent decree, the reimbursement system is still geared to funding programs held in facilities like sheltered workshops and day centers, where one staff member can keep an eye on larger groups of individuals than is possible in the community.

Zanchi and Reynolds each said they want the public to participate in drawing up the applications for the Health Home and Alternate Payment Method.

“We have a lot of work to do in a very quick time frame, and like everything else we’ve done, we’re going to do it with our constituents,”  Zanchi said.

The state anticipates submitting the applications, receiving decisions, and beginning pilot programs by next Jan. 1, according to Zanchi. CMS would pay 90 cents on the dollar to support the pilot programs for a maximum of two years.

Flyers distributed at the meeting gave a schedule for public meetings on the applications, but the schedule was put on hold. Reynolds said she is the contact person for the Health Home. She can be reached at 401-462-3941 or at Kimberly.Reynolds@bhddh.ri.gov 

RI Direct Care Workers To See Raises in October Paychecks; Legislator Says They Deserve More

By Gina Macris

Raises for direct care workers in Rhode Island, including those who serve persons with developmental disabilities, are scheduled to show up in paychecks in October. But the increases are unlikely to fix problems caused by wages that many consider inadequate to stabilize a workforce plagued by high turnover, high vacancy rates, and high overtime. 

Even after receiving the pay hike, many workers will be forced to continue working second jobs to make ends meet.

Meanwhile, their employers will still have to scramble to fill vacancies, as Massachusetts prepares to pay $15 an hour for the same work beginning July 1, 2018.  Currently, one in six jobs goes unfilled, driving up overtime costs for developmental disability providers, according to the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, (CPNRI), a trade association.  

Those who work with adults with developmental disabilities in Rhode Island make an average of $11.14 an hour, and an estimated increase of 42 cents would bring that hourly rate to $11.56. The exact increase is expected to vary from one agency to another, depending on benefits offered.

Unless the workers are single adults supporting only themselves, $11.56 an hour is not enough for a minimum subsistence wage – no restaurant meals, entertainment or savings accounts - that nevertheless avoids food stamps or other public assistance, according to the Living Wage Calculator at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In Rhode Island, 41 percent of those working with adults with developmental disabilities have taken more than one job to make ends meet, according to CPNRI. The trade associaation presented figues to the General Assembly earlier this year that show 65 percent of direct care workers were heads of household in 2014, and 48 percent of them received public assistance between 2011 and 2013, the latest period for which data was available.

Entry-level positions for direct care positions at developmental disability service agencies generally hover a little above the minimum wage, currently $9.60 an hour. But the minimum wage is to get a 50-cent bump to $10.10 on Jan. 1 and another increase, to $10.50 an hour, on Jan. 1, 2019.

 In the current budget, $6.1 million in federal-state Medicaid dollars have been set aside for raises for those who provide direct care to adults with developmental disabilities, effective July 1.

Governor Raimondo also asked for a total of $5.2 million for increasing the pay of home health care aides, but the General Assembly delayed implementation of that raise until Oct. 1. House spokesman Larry Berman said that the way a similar increase was paid out to home care workers in 2016 made implementation problematic prior to Oct. 1 of the budget year and that issue was taken into account this year. The delayed implementation also saves more than $600,000 in state funds.  

Developmental disability service agencies also can expect to see higher reimbursement rates Oct. 1, but those increases will be retroactive to July 1, in accordance with language in the budget.

State Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, who has led a call for improving the prospects of direct care workers, agreed that the direct care workers are treading water, in effect, relative to the minimum wage.  

He said he is well aware that raises enacted in 2016 and 2017 are not enough to compensate them for complex work that is often also physically demanding.

The new Amazon warehouse in Fall River is paying more than $12 an hour to start, he said.

In the fall of 2016, DiPalma launched a “15 in 5” campaign to increase pay of home health care aides and direct care workers to $15 an hour in five years – by July 1, 2021.

There appears to be broad sentiment in the legislature that direct care workers deserve better, judging from the number of bills introduced in the General Assembly earlier this year to speed up the climb to a $15 hourly rate. One measure, sponsored by the House Deputy Majority Leader, Rep. Jean Philippe Barros, D-Pawtucket, would have set Jan. 1 as the implementation date for a $15 hourly wage.

But the bills appear to have been more a gesture more than anything else.

DiPalma, first vice-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said that the state’s finances cannot support that kind of a boost immediately.

The state faces the prospect of a $237 million deficit in the fiscal year that begins next July 1, according recent memos from the State Budget Officer, Thomas Mullaney, and the Senate Fiscal Advisor, Stephen Whitney. And that estimateddeficit does not include $25 million in unspecified savings which the state still must trim from the current budget. Jonathan Womer, Director of the Office of Management and Budget,  has expressed skepticism that all the cost-cutting assumptions in the enacted budget can be achieved.

Department heads preparing for the next budget cycle are being asked to cut expenditures by 10 percent, with one exception being entitlement programs, like the federal-state Medicaid program, which funds the pay for home health care aides and developmental disability workers, among many other services.