DOJ, RI Spar Over Contempt In Olmstead Case

Federal Courthouse in Providence

By Gina Macris

The state of Rhode Island told a judge it cannot be held in contempt of a 2014 civil rights consent decree seeking to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities because of circumstances beyond the state’s control.

But the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says that the state has only itself to blame for its failure to comply.

The state’s “persistent choices to under-fund the system have created a dramatic provider shortage” that has left the target population isolated, the DOJ said in a counter-argument submitted Friday, Sept. 10, to the U.S. District Court.

The “refusal to adequately fund the Consent Decree is precisely the kind of self-imposed inability to comply” that undermines the state’s arguments in its defense, the DOJ said.

The decree stems from a 2014 finding by the DOJ that the state violated the Americans With Disabilities Act by relying too much on sheltered workshops paying sub-minimum wages and isolated day care centers, which kept people with disabilities out of mainstream society. The Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court has re-affirmed the rights of people with disabilities to receive support in their communities to give them a chance to live regular lives.

The DOJ further cites warnings of an independent court monitor a year ago that the state will be unable to comply with the consent decree by 2024 unless it came up with a multi-year plan to overhaul its developmental disabilities system, which for a decade has encouraged segregated care over integrated services. Such a plan has not been forthcoming.

The state’s lawyers, Marc DeSisto and Kathleen Hilton, submitted arguments Sept. 1 in response to a DOJ motion two weeks earlier that asked the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court to find the state in contempt of the consent decree and impose fines ranging up to $1.5 million per month. Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has scheduled a hearing the week of Oct. 18 through Oct. 22.

The state’s lawyers maintained the state could not meet benchmarks for integrated employment and other criteria because of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as resistance by adults with developmental disabilities themselves to work and non-work activities in the community.

But in its reply Sept. 10, the DOJ said the state’s characterization of the population “paints an inaccurate and offensive picture of people with developmental disabilities” and “reflects a profound misunderstanding of the nature, purpose, and obligations of the Consent Decree.”

DeSisto and Hilton, meanwhile, also argued that numerical targets for employment of adults with disabilities were not required by the consent decree, even though, as the DOJ said, documents show that state officials have admitted the opposite in numerous statements to the court since 2014, in writing or in person..

The state’s lawyers also maintained the state cannot be held in contempt until after the agreement expires on June 30, 2024 – an interpretation the DOJ said is unheard of in litigation involving system-wide reform.

In picking apart the state’s position over 28 pages, the DOJ said the state is urging the court “to adopt an interpretation of the consent decree that is “at odds with the decree’s text and purpose,” the DOJ said.

The state maintained the consent decree “imposed what could only be described as a cultural shock on the targeted community. After years of receiving services in “non-community” settings, “they are being told that their lifestyle must change,” the state’s lawyers said.

The DOJ disagreed. Rather than being told what they must do, the DOJ said, those eligible for services and their families have the right to make informed choices after receiving education and support about what working and enjoying leisure activities in the community might mean for them.

The state’s own data show that it “dramatically overstates” the resistance to integrated services, with 80 of 1,877 persons, or 4 percent, opting out of integrated services through a formal variance process, the DOJ said. And it cited a report from a court monitor in 2016 who had said he found “strong broad-based acceptance of the goals and desired outcomes of the consent decree.”

Similarly, the DOJ lawyers rejected the state’s argument that the COVID-19 pandemic prevented compliance with the annual employment targets in the consent decree. The pace of new job placements had slowed significantly more than a year before the onset of COVID-19, the DOJ said.

While the pandemic did make compliance more challenging, the state made “minimal efforts” to serve the consent decree population during the pandemic, the DOJ’s civil rights division argued.

“Given the availability of enhanced federal matching funds for providing integrated Medicaid services like those the Consent Decree requires, the State has the opportunity to increase funding for integrated employment services, provide the full amount of integrated day services to each target population member, and enhance wages to attract the required number of service providers,” the DOJ said. Its memorandum is signed by Rebecca B. Bond, chief of the DOJ’s civil rights division, as well as trial attorneys expected to litigate the case in October.

The state did earmark $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid money to raise the wages of workers and their supervisors by $2 to $3 an hour in the current budget, a roughly 15 percent increase, but only at the conclusion of court-ordered negotiations between state officials and providers.

DeSisto and Hilton, the state’s lawyers, also said the state is finalizing the language in a request for outside proposals “for evaluation and implementation of new rate and payment options for (the) Developmental Disabilities Services System.” The preparation for the request for proposals indicates that BHDDH plans to go out to bid through the state purchasing system, which can take several months.

The state last conducted a rate review in 2010 and 2011, but the General Assembly did not follow the recommendations of the consultant, Burns & Associates. Instead, it set dozens of reimbursement rates for private providers roughly 17 to 19 percent lower than Burns & Associates recommended, with the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) saying that it still expected providers to maintain the same level of service.

In November 2018, a principal in Burns & Associates, Mark Podrazik, testified before a special legislative commission that that a rate review was already overdue. Rates should be reviewed every five years, he said.

A few months later, BHDDH hired NESCSO, the nonprofit New England States Consortium Systems Organization, to analyze Rhode Island’s developmental disabilities system from top to bottom.

Although the NESCSO contract called for a rate review and analysis of alternatives to the state’s fee-for-service reimbursement system, NESCSO was asked to present options for change but to make no recommendations.

The BHDDH director at the time, Rebecca Boss, said the department wanted to expand its analytical capability and make its own choices going forward.

The 18-month contract, which cost $1.1 million, produced a final report and supplementary technical materials which, among many other things, said the provider system was significantly underfunded. Since the report was completed July 1, 2020, BHDDH has remained silent on its findings, and has not exercised options for renewal of NESCSOs services.

In their memorandum, the state’s lawyers said that “the intention of the rate review process is to strengthen the I/DD system and services provided to individuals, as well as to address provider capacity to deliver those same services. Thus, the State can and will at hearing clearly demonstrate that it has been ‘performing its obligations’ under the various sections of the Consent Decree.”

The DOJ has scoffed at that notion. The DOJ said in its original filing in August that it is prepared to show the “State failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation, and that the State failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.

DOJ Seeks Fines Up To $50K Daily For Rhode Island’s DD Consent Decree Noncompliance

By Gina Macris

The US. Department of Justice has proposed fines up to $1.5 million a month against the state of Rhode Island for failing to comply with a civil rights consent decree protecting adults with developmental disabilities during the last seven years.

The proposed fines are part of a preliminary filing in connection with a contempt hearing scheduled for mid-October by Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the U.S. District Court.

“The United States has sought for several years to work with the State regarding its noncompliance, to no avail,” said the DOJ lawyers.

In a memorandum to McConnell, the DOJ said that the state has fallen far short of numerical targets for providing services for integrating adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, both for employment and non-work activities.

Nor has the state kept its promise to provide adequate funding to maintain the number of agencies and workers needed to provide these services, the DOJ said. Then-governor Lincoln Chafee signed the consent decree April 8, 2014.

If necessary, the DOJ said, it will present evidence in October that state “failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation” and that it “failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.”

Those “rules and incentives” allude to Project Sustainability, a ten-year old fee-for-service reimbursement model that still allocates 40 percent of a recipient’s service hours to segregated, center-based care.

The DOJ said the court should “impose a reasonable fine on the state to incentivize it to rapidly come back into compliance with the Consent Decree, and to compensate for the state’s current underfunding of services.”

The proposed schedule of fines:

• $500,000 on the first day of the month for the first two months after a judicial finding of contempt.

• $50,000 a day, or about $1.5 million a month, beginning on the 70th day after a contempt order. The money would be deposited in a special fund to be used for consent decree compliance. The state should be prohibited from paying the fines out of any funding that otherwise would benefit Rhode Islanders with disabilities, the DOJ said.

McConnell has cleared the week of Oct. 18 through Oct. 22 to hear evidence in the contempt proceedings. The consent decree draws its authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, as reinforced by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

To help remedy any contempt finding and lessen fines, the state could increase the number of supported employment placements and expand the service hours of integrated daytime activities in accordance with the consent decree, the DOJ said.

In a separate step, the DOJ asked McConnell to order the state to prepare a plan for funding and complying with the consent decree before its term ends June 30, 2024. Such a document could help remedy the contempt and, with the court’s approval, could be incorporated in the existing decree.

By its own account, the state has missed its employment targets by more than a third for people in two categories of the consent decree population. They are the “Youth Exit” group, adults who left high school between 2013 and 2016, and the “Sheltered Workshop” group, those who once worked for subminimum wages in sheltered workshops, which were eliminated in 2018.

The chart below, from the state’s report to the court for the quarter ending March 31, shows employment in relation to the latest consent decree targets for a 12-month period. While part of the slow growth during 2020 might be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, the state had been falling further behind in previous years.

In another category, only 55 percent of adults are participating in integrated non-work activities in the community for slightly less than ten hours a week, on average, and only a fraction have a combined schedule of employment and other activities in the community filling more than 20 hours a week, according to the latest report of an independent court monitor, cited by the DOJ. In the consent decree, the state agreed to fund services for a total of 40 hours a week.

The DOJ also cited the monitor’s assessment that the state lacks the workers and the funding necessary to provide the services to comply with the consent decree.

Consultants from Approach Group, a Boston-based firm, have calculated the worker shortage at more than a 1000 of the 2845 direct care staff it said are needed to support Rhode Islanders with developmental disabilities in the community.

Separately, Approach Group and three other consultancy firms participated in 18-month, $1.1 million analysis of the developmental disabilities system commissioned by the state that found fiscal instability in the private provider system, which the state relies on for compliance with the consent decree.

The organizer of the four firms, the New England States Consortium Systems Organization (NESCSO), submitted its final report July 1, 2020, to the state Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH), laying out various options for alternatives to the state’s fee-for-service reimbursement system.

But the state’s subsequent budget deliberations did not address the NESCSO report or the needs it identified.

Instead, it appeared that BHDDH and Governor Dan McKee’s initial budget proposal responded to a directive from the Office of Management and Budget for a 15 percent budget reduction across the board.

In the end, Judge McConnell ordered state officials and providers to negotiate a wage hike in an effort to attract more workers.

As a result, the General Assembly set aside $39.7 million in the current budget for raises of $2 to $3 an hour for front-line workers and their supervisors, effective July 1. McConnell also has ordered that entry-level wages climb to $20 by 2024 to make Rhode Island competitive with neighboring states in what is a nationwide shortage of caregivers.

While the state is facing the prospect of hefty fines beginning as soon as November, BHDDH is seeking further study of the needs of adults with developmental disabilities.

Despite NESCSO’s detailed analysis and presentation of options for systems change, BHDDH reported to the court in July that “efforts are underway to draft an RFP (request for proposals) for a Systems Rate Review.

“The focus of this Rate Review will be to take an in-depth look at how services are funded in the Adult DD System to determine if the funding is adequate; if the appropriate services are being funded; and to look at new services categories,” the state’s report to McConnell said.

To read the DOJ’s proposed contempt order, click here.

To read the DOJ’s motion for contempt, click here.

To read the DOJ’s arguments for contempt, click here.

For charts supporting the DOJ’s arguments, click here.

Employers Advancing DD Worker Raises While State Updates Reimbursement System

By Gina Macris

Most providers of services for adults with developmental disabilities in Rhode Island have passed along wage increases enacted by the General Assembly for the fiscal year that began July 1, even though the state’s developmental disabilities agency has not yet programmed the higher rates into its reimbursement system.

The raises, negotiated between state officials and representatives of some three dozen private provider agencies under pressure from the U.S. District Court, increase hourly wages for direct care workers by more than $2, from about $13.18 to an estimated $15.75 per hour, depending on variations in payroll taxes and other employer costs related to employment.

The General Assembly approved hikes of well over $3 for supervisory personnel, from $18.41 to $21.99 an hour.

Providers who can afford it are “floating” the pay hikes to staff for a few weeks with the assurance that they will be reimbursed when the increases are fully implemented by the state’s Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH), said Tina Spears.

“Providers are desperate for staff,” said Spears, executive director of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), a trade association representing about two dozen private agencies. The worker shortage, exacerbated by the pandemic, has increased employers’ overtime costs and forced many supervisors to provide direct care.

The General Assembly set aside $39.7 million in the BHDDH budget for the raises and “associated payroll costs,” which BHDDH says should put the “minimum” pay at $15.75 an hour for direct care workers and $21.99 an hour for supervisors.

But providers say the mathematical formula BHDDH uses to calculate the minimum pay doesn’t allow enough for the added payroll taxes employers must pay every time they hire a new staffer or give someone a raise.

Spears said providers are making every effort to pass on as much of the extra money as possible to their employees. Everyone should be making at least $15 an hour, she said.

In a newsletter last week, BHDDH officials encouraged those “self-directed” individuals or families managing a loved one’s individualized program to advance raises to the workers they hire even though their funding authorizations have not yet been adjusted to reflect higher rates. Self-directed individuals, who do not have overhead, pay more than the provider agencies but don’t offer benefits.

It’s not yet clear whether the pay hikes will be enough to cut into the workforce deficit, one of the reasons holding BHDDH back from implementing requirements of a 2014 consent decree mandating that adults with developmental disabilities be integrated in their communities.

Massachusetts and Connecticut both pay higher hourly rates than Rhode Island for similar jobs, one factor that is said to contribute to the state’s worker shortage.

A consultant has estimated that Rhode Island needs at least 1000 more individuals working with adults with developmental disabilities to implement the consent decree. The worker shortage is one of several reasons the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court, John J. McConnell, Jr., has scheduled a week-long hearing in mid-October to gather evidence for holding the state in contempt for its failure to overhaul its developmental disabilities system as required by the consent decree.

RI House To Vote On Pay Hikes For RI DD Workers

UPDATE: On June 24, the House passed a $336.7 million developmental disabilities budget as recommended by the Finance Committee. It is part of an overall overall $13.1 billion spending package proposed for the fiscal year beginning July 1 that now goes to the Senate.

By Gina Macris

Rhode Island would add an estimated $2.53 an hour to entry-level pay for caregivers of adults with developmental disabilities in the proposed state budget that it is headed for a vote in the House Thursday, June 24. But it’s not clear if the wage hike will be enough to attract needed workers.

The proposed wage increase, from an estimated $13.18 to $15.75 an hour, resulted from months-long, court-ordered negotiations intended to develop a three-year plan to strengthen Rhode Island’s private developmental disability system so it will enable the state to comply with a 2014 civil rights consent decree.

The proposed wage package also includes a $3.58 hourly increase for supervisory personnel, from $18.41 to an estimated $21.99 an hour.

The House Finance Committee accepted the negotiated rates during a June 17 vote on the overall budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1. But it rejected Governor Dan McKee’s plan to privatize the state’s own parallel group home system, saying 50 state jobs that would have been eliminated should be restored to the state payroll.

In all, the state and privately-run developmental disabilities systems would get nearly $336.7 million in the fiscal year beginning July 1, an increase of roughly $32.7 million over the current budget of $304 million.

The privately-run system would get a total of $297.6 million, or about $37.2 million more than the current allocation of $260.4 million, according to figures from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

The higher total reflects the cost of the pay hikes, $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid funding, including the redirection of $13 million of a $15 million “transition and transformation fund” the McKee had administration originally had proposed for court-ordered system reforms to comply with the consent decree.

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court had ordered the state to come up with a three-year plan by June 30 that would spell out what it intends to do to comply with the consent decree by the end of the decade-long implementation period June 30, 2024.

In a recent report, an independent court monitor told the judge that the second and third years of the plan were not discussed during the recent negotiations, and he recommended that the state continue to meet with private service providers and others on a weekly basis to discuss unresolved issues.

In a recent hearing before the House Finance Committee’s Subcommittee on Human Services, the director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities, Kevin Savage, said the state has a “difficult” relationship with the federal court.

While providers have called the raises a significant step, they say they do not believe that the new rate of $15.75 will affect their worker shortage when Massachusetts and Connecticut are paying more.

On July 1, minimum wages in Connecticut will increase to $16.50 an hour for private-sector direct care workers in the first year of a two-year contract between that state and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The rate will jump to $17.25 on July 1, 2022.

Massachusetts will pay direct care workers at privately-run agencies a minimum of $16.10 an hour beginning July 1, the final year of a three-year contract with another branch of the SEIU, according to a salary schedule on a Massachusetts state website related to “personal care attendants.”

Tina Spears, executive director of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, has said in recent weeks that she has recommended data be collected on hiring and retention to enable the court to gauge whether the wage hikes help providers expand their workforce.

As it now stands, the private system lacks about 37 percent of the workforce it needs to support individuals in jobs and non-work activities in the community as required by the consent decree and the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, according to a recent report made to the court.

In other changes, the House Finance Committee moved up by one year the date for including the developmental disabilities caseload in an important budget-planning exercise, the Caseload Estimating Conference. That means the change would take effect in 2021, instead of 2022.

Judge McConnell has ordered that the developmental disabilities caseload be part of the discussion at the Caseload Estimating Conference beginning November of this year to bring transparency and consistency to budgeting for these services.

House Finance recommended the Executive Office of Health and Human Services give assistance to the BHDDH to prepare the caseload data for presentation at the November conference.

The McKee administration never explained why it originally proposed that the change be made in 2022.

In another court-ordered reform, an OMB spokesman confirmed that the allocation for the privately-run system of services contains $6.8 million to fully fund annual authorizations that set an individual spending limit for each person receiving developmental disability services.

For the last decade, the authorizations have been available on a quarterly basis. Any amount not utilized within a particular three-month period cannot be carried over to the next quarter. And the fee-for-service reimbursement system now in place means that providers cannot bill for those who do not participate on a particular day, for whatever reason, even though the agencies may incur the same costs for staffing.

Providers and service recipients and their families alike say that annual funding will allow them greater flexibility in planning their programs.

"Significant" Raises Proposed For RI DD Workers After Court-Ordered Talks

By Gina Macris

RI Governor Dan McKee’s proposal to raise wages from $13.18 to $15.75 an hour for caregivers of adults with developmental disabilities might prevent a widespread worker shortage from getting worse.

But those who have had the frustrating experience trying to recruit and retain workers at the current lower rate told the House Finance Committee June 10 that the proposed raise, while significant, will not be enough to ease the labor crisis that prevents the state from complying with a 2014 civil rights consent decree affecting adults with developmental disabilities.

Other advocates made the broader statement that that paying a living wage to caregivers of all vulnerable populations is a moral imperative. Raising pay to attract more workers also is essential to guaranteeing the civil rights of vulnerable people, no matter what their disability, they said.

The Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, (ADA), reinforced by the 1999 Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, says that those with disabilities have a right to receive the services they need to live regular lives in their communities.

If the state does not adopt a comprehensive Olmstead plan to provide integrated, community-based services to all people with disabilities, it will remain vulnerable to more litigation like the ADA complaint of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) which led to the 2014 consent decree, said a spokesman for the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council.

As it is, Rhode Island’s Director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities acknowledged at the House Finance Committee hearing that the state has a “difficult relationship” with the U.S. District Court and the DOJ over the status of implementation and the unfinished work ahead as the agreement nears its conclusion in 2024.

I/DD Population Sitting At Home

Seven years after Rhode Island signed the consent decree, agreeing to end the segregation of sheltered workshops and day care centers, many adults with developmental disabilities are no better off.

For example, Jacob Cohen of North Kingstown, who once had a full schedule of activities in the community, now gets only three hours a week of support time, his father, Howard, told the Finance Committee in written testimony.

At AccessPoint RI, a Cranston-based service agency, 50 of 109 supervisory and direct care jobs are vacant and 60 out of 160 clients are not getting any daytime services, according to the executive director.

The consent decree calls for 40 hours a week of employment-related supports and other activities in the community.

A consultants’ report commissioned by providers says the private service providers lack 1,081 of the 2845 full time direct care workers they need to carry out the requirements of the consent decree. COVID-19 exacerbated the workforce shortage but did not cause it, the consultants said. The consultants said that depending on living arrangements, persons with developmental disabilities have experienced a reduction in services ranging from 49 percent to 71.6 percent, with those in family homes having the severest cutbacks.

The McKee administration’s proposed $15.75 hourly reimbursement rate would represent a wage hike of about $2.50 or more for direct care workers – roughly 20 percent.

The state does not set private-sector wages directly but reimburses the private agencies for wages and employment-related overhead, like taxes and workers compensation. Some providers pay a little more than the current hourly minimum of $13.18, by subsidizing wages with revenue from other types of services.

In addition to raising direct care worker pay, the proposal would raise reimbursement levels for supervisors’ wages from $18.41 to $21.99. There would be no raises for support coordinators or job developers, who are paid $21.47 an hour. Nor would those in a catch-all “professional” category receive a pay increase. They are paid $27.52 an hour, according to a presentation the House Fiscal Advisor made to the Finance Committee.

The overall wage increase would cost a total of $39.7 million in federal-state Medicaid funding, including $16.8 million in state revenue and $22.9 million in federal reimbursements.

Of the state’s share of the cost, $13 million would be re-directed from a $15 million “transition and transformation fund” for developing systemic reforms aimed at quality improvement and the reimbursement model that pays private providers. The reimbursement model was redesigned a decade ago to favor segregated care and has not been fundamentally changed since then.

Robert Marshall, the spokesman for the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council, warned that gutting the so-called “transition and transformation fund” could heighten the state’s non-compliance with the consent decree and leave it open to additional federal action.

House Fiscal Office

With the governor’s proposed raises included, the allocation to the private developmental disabilities system would jump from $260.3 million in federal-state Medicaid funding in the current fiscal year to $297.7 million, an overall increase of $37.4 million, according to the presentation of the House Fiscal Officer, Sharon Reynolds Ferland.

Tina Spears, executive director of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), a trade association which negotiated the wage hike with the state, called it a “notable first step in rebuilding the workforce serving people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.”

SPEARS CPNRI

“This wage increase will improve the lives of both those who do the work and the families who are served by that work,” she said in written testimony.

But Spears, who had pressed for a rate of $17.50 an hour, told the committee that the state’s final offer of $15.75 does not make it competitive in attracting new workers.

Complicating the salary issue, the administration expects the private agencies to accept group home residents from the state-run developmental disabilities system, which it plans to phase out. The current allocation of $29.7 million for state-run group homes, named Rhode Island Community Living and Supports (RICLAS) would be cut to $9 million in the next budget.

Both the unions representing RICLAS workers and the private providers have expressed skepticism that the privatization is feasible.

The budget calls for the reduction of 50 RICLAS positions. RICLAS pays workers a starting rate of about $18.55 an hour, more than $5 above the current entry-level pay in the private system, and about $2.80 above the proposed new private-pay rate.

On July 1, minimum wages in Connecticut will increase to $16.50 an hour for private-sector direct care workers in the first year of a two-year contract between that state and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The rate will jump to $17.25 on July 1, 2022.

Massachusetts will pay direct care workers at privately-run agencies a minimum of $16.10 an hour beginning July 1, the final year of a three-year contract with another branch of the SEIU, according to a salary schedule on a Massachusetts state website related to “personal care attendants.”

Massachusetts already siphons off some of Rhode Island’s best caregivers, said Michael Andrade, President of CPNRI and CEO of Pro-Ability at the Bristol County ARC.

Ruggiero Capitol TV

During the hearing, Rep. Deborah Ruggiero asked Jonathan Womer, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), to tell her who has been leading the state’s response to the consent decree during the last few years and explain why there has been “so little progress.”

She also wanted to know why she’s hearing reports that the state is “not in very good standing” with the Court or the DOJ and what is being done to change that situation.

Womer introduced Kevin Savage, who has been in charge of the Division of Developmental Disabilities since last July.

“While we haven’t met a number of benchmarks for getting people to work” in the community, Savage said, “there are no longer any sheltered workshops in Rhode Island.”

SAVAGE

“That’s a major achievement of the consent decree,” Savage said. He added that because of the pandemic, meeting goals for employment and community integration has been “extremely challenging,”

During state budget preparations, which began last fall during great economic uncertainty, OMB asked state agencies to submit proposals with 15 percent reductions in their spending plans. The economic outlook has brightened considerably since then.

In January, Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court said Rhode Island must raise direct care wages to $20 an hour by 2024 to attract more direct care workers to Rhode Island providers, who do the work in the field necessary to enable the state to comply with the consent decree.

Two months later, in March, the governor submitted a budget proposal that offered no raises. Then came court-ordered negotiations, which resulted in the administration’s proposal for the $15.75 rate, as well as a separate budget amendment that would comply with another court order, making the developmental disabilities caseload part of formal, consensus-building state budget preparations in November of this year.

During the budget hearing, Savage said, “We are having a difficult time in our relationship with the Court. We do want to repair that.”

“We have tremendous respect for the judge and tremendous respect for the court monitor. We work with some of the best providers you can work with, so it’s really not a matter of not wanting to work with the providers or the court monitor,” Savage said.

The negotiations took too long, he acknowledged.

“We need to pick up the pieces and move forward faster,” he said, engaging the community “much more robustly than we have.”

“We need to get to get to $20 by 2024,” to “stabilize the workforce,” and make other reforms as part of a court ordered, comprehensive three-year compliance plan, he said.

Rep. Alex Marszalkowski, D- Cumberland, chairman of the Human Services Subcommittee of the House Finance Committee, asked why the wage increases would apply to group home workers when the consent decree is limited to issues related to daytime services.

Savage responded that “if we stabilize one part of the workforce, we destabilize the other; the only path is to stabilize the entire system.”

Emphasis on Civil Rights

Later in the hearing, Spears, the CPNRI director, emphasized that hard-working caregivers deserve a living wage and noted that “civil rights protections” are at the heart of the 2014 consent decree. “It’s essentially a corrective action plan to resolve civil rights violations and make sure they never happen again,” she said.

She added: “We are seven years into a ten-year agreement, and there is a tremendous amount of pressure from the Court and the U.S. Department of Justice to achieve the established benchmarks.” As it now stands, the private sector cannot deliver on the compliance the state needs, Spears said.

The Chair of the Long Term Care Coordinating Council (LTCCC) and the representative of the Developmental Disabilities Council each applied a broader perspective on the budget amendments, saying the General Assembly must address the workforce and quality-of-life issues across all vulnerable populations.

Maureen Maigret, chair of the LTCCC, recommended the General Assembly use some of the current Medicaid reimbursement rate, enhanced under provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act, to raise the wages of direct care workers funded by Medicaid’s Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) to the same level proposed for those working in developmental disabilities.

“The issues facing other types of home and community-based services and residential programs are similar to providers of services for persons with developmental disabilities,” Maigret said in written testimony, citing low wages, high turnover and staff burnout, all exacerbated by the pandemic.

“And we know that almost a majority of these workers are women and persons of color whose value has historically been under-valued,” Maigret said.

“Efforts to achieve wage parity for all direct care staff working in government-subsidized Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) is imperative if the state is to have a quality and accessible LTSS (Long Term Services and Supports) system with appropriate options for persons needing care,” she said.

Marshall, of the DD Council, said Rhode Island could use some of the one-time stimulus funding under provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act to develop an Olmstead plan, a multi-year blueprint for conforming to requirements of the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

Only seven states — Rhode Island among them - still lack such a plan, he said.

Because of the Olmstead decision, Medicaid changed the rules of Home and Community-Based Services programs to help vulnerable persons live as independently as possible at home or in home-like settings.

Marshall said Rhode Island has been in violation of Medicaid’s regulations on home and community-based services since 2014 and is “vulnerable to yet another Department of Justice lawsuit or ineligibility for federal Medicaid match.”

RI House Finance Committee To Air Governor’s New Plan To Raise DD Wages

By Gina Macris

Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee has asked the General Assembly to fund hourly pay rates of $15.75 for frontline workers serving adults with developmental disabilities and $21.99 for supervisory personnel.

The House Finance Committee will hold a public hearing on the proposal Thursday, June 10, at the conclusion of the full session of the House, which is not set at a fixed time but usually occurs sometime after 5 p.m.

The budget amendment aims to offer competitive wages to direct care workers in compliance with a 2014 civil rights consent decree, according to a June 7 memo from Jonathan Womer, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, sent to the chairmen of the House and Senate finance committees.

The wage increases would cost a total of $26.7 million more in federal-state Medicaid funding than McKee had originally proposed for the privately-run developmental disability service system in the fiscal year beginning July 1 – nearly $7.8 million in additional state revenue, and almost  $19 million in federal reimbursements.  

McKee also would redirect $13 million in Medicaid funding to the wage package, including $9 million in state revenue and $4 million in federal funding. That means the entire wage package would cost a total of $39.7 million, with federal reimbursements accounting for well over half that figure. Entry-level workers in the privately-run system are now paid about $13.18 to $13.40 an hour, according to various providers.

The $13 million re-directed to wages would come from a $15 million “transition and transformation fund” for initiating systemic reforms to help the shift to integrated, community-based services required by the consent decree. McKee’s proposal would leave the innovation fund with $2 million. (A recent report of an independent monitor to the U.S. District Court recently criticized an earlier state plan that would have eliminated the innovation fund, putting all the $15 million into wages.)

In another matter aimed at consent decree compliance, the proposed budget amendment would move up the date for including the caseload of the privately-run system of developmental disabilities in the semi-annual Caseload Estimating Conference used by the executive and legislative branches of state government to plan state budgets.

The amendment would add these caseload numbers to deliberations beginning November, 2021, as ordered by the federal court, instead of November, 2022., as had been originally proposed by the McKee administration. The inclusion of the developmental disabilities caseload is intended to ensure predictable, consistent funding for these entitlement services funded by the Medicaid program, according to the court order.

Because of COVID-19 public health restrictions, the Finance Committee will not take testimony in person. Instead, it has established rules for those who wish to submit written testimony in advance or pre-register to be called on the phone to submit verbal testimony.

According to the agenda for Thursday’s hearing:

“The meeting will be televised live on Capitol Television, which can be seen on Cox Channels 15, and 61, in high definition on Cox Channel 1061, on Full Channel on Channel 15 and on Channel 34 by Verizon subscribers. It will also be live streamed at http://rilegislature.gov/CapTV/Pages/default.aspx

“WRITTEN TESTIMONY: Written testimony is strongly encouraged and may be submitted via HouseFinance@rilegislature.gov   Indicate your name, bill number, and viewpoint (for/against/neither) at top of message. Due to high volume, clerks are not screening this inbox for verbal testimony requests. This inbox is for written testimony only. DEADLINE: Written testimony should be submitted no later than three (3) hours prior to the posted meeting time. Every effort will be made to share written testimony submitted before the deadline with committee members prior to the hearing. Testimony received after deadline will be sent to committee members and posted to the website as soon as possible. For faster processing, it is recommended that testimony is submitted as a PDF file. Testimony will be posted on the General Assembly website, http://www.rilegislature.gov/Special/comdoc/Pages/HFIN.aspx

“VERBAL TESTIMONY: Due to the extremely high volume of requests, and in order to accommodate as many constituents as possible, please take note of the revised procedure for verbal testimony:

“DEADLINE: Requests for verbal testimony must be submitted via the link, by 4:00 PM on Wednesday, June 9, 2021. For verbal testimony requests, CLICK HERE  

“Verbal testimony accepted on any bill scheduled for "Hearing and/or Consideration" only The committee is unable to designate a specific time that you will be called. In the event you are unavailable when called, witnesses are urged to submit written testimony. Christopher O'Brien Committee Clerk 222-6916 HouseFinance@rilegislature.gov  “

DiPalma: $184 M DD Wage Settlement In CT Should Guide RI Talks

DiPalma Photo by Anne Peters

By Gina Macris

Will higher wages for workers who help persons with developmental disabilities in neighboring Connecticut and Massachusetts force increased pay for similar workers in Rhode Island?

State Sen. Louis DiPalma says they should; particularly a two-year contract settled just a few days ago in Connecticut that gives frontline workers $16.50 an hour in the fiscal year beginning July 1 and $17.25 in July, 2022.

While leaders of private agencies in Rhode Island that provide services to persons with disabilities have tentatively agreed to a $15.75 reimbursement rate for entry-level caregivers, they did so reluctantly, saying that it’s not competitive enough to help them stabilize or expand their workforce.

And it’s not yet known whether that figure is acceptable to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court, who has involved himself in workforce issues because they are connected to the state’s compliance with a 2014 civil rights decree requiring the integration of adults with developmental disabilities in their communities.

DiPalma, a strong advocate for those with disabilities and an influential legislator, said in a telephone interview with Developmental Disability News that the $15.75 hourly reimbursement rate the private providers tentatively accepted from the state is “necessary but not sufficient.”

Connecticut’s eleventh-hour settlement with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) averted a strike of 2,100 group home workers who had planned to walk out June 4.

In addition to the wage hikes, the agreement provides 3-percent raises to those already making more than entry-level pay, as well as a a pool of $30 million over the next two years for enhanced medical and retirement benefits. The entire package will cost a total of $184.1 million, according to a statement from the Connecticut state policy office and department of developmental disability services.

In Massachusetts, personal care attendants who work with adults facing intellectual challenges, as well as with others who need daily assistance, make $16.10 an hour, according to the website of their union, 1199 SEIU East, a different branch of the same overall organization representing the group home workers in Connecticut. Rhode Island routinely loses some of its best developmental disability professionals to Massachusetts, and DiPalma said Connecticut is “not that far.”

The strike threat in Connecticut was “a means to an end,” DiPalma said.

“Never mind how they got there,” he said. The state wouldn’t have put up the $184.1 million in the two-year package unless it valued the workers, DiPalma said.

For the most part, the employees of some three dozen private providers of developmental disability services in Rhode Island are not unionized. Wage talks have involved their employers and state officials and revolve around reimbursement rates to the private agencies, not the wages themselves.

Because of differences among agencies in employee-related overhead costs, like workers’ compensation, the actual wages are not exactly the same as the reimbursement rates negotiated between employers and the state, according to Tina Spears, executive director of the largest provider trade association, the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI)

The most recent CPNRI calculations indicate that the average starting pay for direct care workers is $13.18, but there are other reports that some agencies pay $13.40 or a little higher.

Those organizations paying a little more have transferred revenue from other programs to subsidize services for adults with developmental disabilities, in a pitch to be a as competitive as they can in the midst of a huge worker shortage, DiPalma said. Not all the agencies have multiple sources of income, he said.

Judge McConnell has heard testimony that low pay and high turnover has adversely impacted the workforce that the state relies on to comply with the 2014 civil rights consent decree, which requires adults with developmental disabilities to be integrated in their communities. The state is nearly 1100 workers short of the number it needs to guide community-based services, according to a consultant’s report.

McConnell has ordered the state to set starting wages at $20 by 2024, with any interim raises being competitive with direct care pay in neighboring states.

McConnell has a private conference scheduled today, June 8 with lawyers in the consent decree case.

RI DD Providers Agree to $15.75 Hourly Rate; Hike May Not Address Worker Shortage

By Gina Macris

Private agencies serving adults with developmental disabilities have asked for an additional $31 million in the next Rhode Island state budget to offer workers about $17.50 an hour – a bump of more than $4 on the current starting hourly pay.

The $31 million in state revenue would generate an additional $48 million in federal funds under the Medicaid program, for a total of $79 million. The private service system is currently funded at $260.4 million in federal-state Medicaid money.

A trade association of providers says its members need a significant wage hike to begin filling a huge hole in the workforce needed to implement a 2014 consent decree aimed at correcting violations of the civil rights of adults with developmental disabilities.

The state, meanwhile, has offered an estimated hourly pay of $15.75 for direct care workers.

Providers have agreed to the state’s figure, a bump of $2.57 over the current average starting pay of $13.18, as well as to an hourly rate of $21.99 for supervisory personnel. It was not immediately clear how much of a raise the supervisors are to receive.

But the providers, represented by the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, say they are concerned that the state’s proposal will have little, if any, effect on their attempts to chip away at the worker shortage.

These latest developments in negotiations involving state officials, providers, families running independent support programs for loved ones, and other stakeholders emerged primarily in a budget briefing for the House Finance Committee June 3 and in a separate June 4 report to the federal court from an independent monitor.

The monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, said the consent decree requires the state not only to make certain reforms but to maintain the capacity to carry them out on a continuing basis. The worker shortage, the equivalent of about 1,081 full time positions, means the state lacks that capacity, Antosh said.

FERLAND

In the June 3 budget briefing, the House Fiscal Advisor, Sharon Reynolds Ferland, told the finance committee about the providers’ $31 million request but offered few details as she described the many moving parts of the state’s overall spending plan for Fiscal 2022, which begins July 1, in less than four weeks.

She said that the $31 million was not a negotiated figure or “anything other than what was asked” by provider agencies

Ferland told the finance committee that the proposed privatization of the state-run group home system is off the table, evaporating an estimated $20 million in savings that the administration had written into the budget.

The privatization depended on the existing network of private agencies – the same ones with the 1,000 worker shortage - to take on some 116 residents of the state-run group home system, without an increase in private-sector pay.

Ferland said that “was not something they (private providers) could support, or handle.”

The state pays its group home workers about $5 more an hour than it allows for frontline caregivers in privately-run homes.

In offering wage increases, the state withdrew all funds that previously had been earmarked for transition and transformation of the service system from a model based on segregated care to one that puts people in their communities.

Antosh

Antosh was not pleased, saying that “it is critical that the State provide transformation and innovation funds in FY 2022,” the fiscal year that begins July 1.

Antosh noted in several places in the report that there has been no discussion of wages or system reform for 2023 or 2024 – the last two years of the consent decree.

He recommended that the state meet with providers and other stakeholders once a week until they reach an agreement on wages for 2022 and 2023 and complete a comprehensive review of the rate structure that governs reimbursement to private providers.

The current rate structure is a dizzying array of dozens of figures and codes, with some rates presented in 15-minute increments of service for each client in the care of a single staff person. For example, providers must enter 20 fifteen-minute service units to get paid for one staffer working with five persons for an hour during the day, according to the current reimbursement methodology.

The state has agreed in principle that the rate structure should be simplified and initially told Antosh it would be done during the next fiscal year, the monitor said. More recently, he said, the state informed him the new rate structure would not be fully fleshed out until 2024.

He recommended that the new rate structure be completed in time for the governor to include it in his budget proposal for the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2023.

Often in the last year, Antosh’s recommendations to Judge McConnell have been transformed into court orders, with the judge becoming increasingly specific on the way he wants the state to address particular issues.

McConnell

For example, to attract high-quality job applicants, McConnell issued an order in January saying the state must increase wages to $20 an hour by 2024. Shortly after that, legislative leaders withdrew their representatives from ongoing talks among officials of the executive branch, the private providers, family members, individuals who receive services, and other advocates.

Spokesmen for the House and Senate said at the time that the General Assembly would deal with compliance issues as part of the legislative process.

Governor McKee’s initial budget proposal included no pay increase for direct care workers or supervisors.

And in a budget hearing June 2 for members of the finance committee’s human services subcommittee, Ferland said some of the court orders, like the one dealing with wages, appear to go “beyond” the consent decree. She did not explain the worker shortage or any other context for McConnell’s order on wages.

The instability of the labor force existed well before the pandemic. According to a detailed analysis commissioned by service providers, before the pandemic the private system had filled the equivalent of 2088 of the 2845 fulltime positions it needed to serve people in the community as the consent decree required, leaving 757 vacancies.

COVID made the situation worse, with the number of vacancies increasing by 324, for a total of 1,081, the consultants, the Approach Group, told Judge McConnell in a report delivered in April.

As a means of ensuring consistent funding on the basis of the latest data available, McConnell has ordered that the developmental disabilities caseload be incorporated into the Caseload Estimating Conference by November of this year.

The twice-yearly caseload estimating and revenue estimating conferences are used in budget preparations both by the executive and legislative branches.

The governor has proposed that the developmental disabilities caseload into the Caseload Estimating Conference beginning in November, 2022.

But in his latest report, Antosh asked the judge to remind the state that the deadline for participation in November, 2021 was “a court order, not a request.” A spokesman for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals said recently that the timing of the switch to the Caseload Estimating Conference was “under review.”

BHDDH has not explained exactly why the change could not be made in 2021 in accordance with the court order.

Another change from the court’s expectations is that there is no funding in the budget to switch from quarterly to annual budget authorizations for each person who receives services, according to Ferland’s June 2 presentation to the human services subcommittee of the finance committee.

The quarterly authorizations, applied to the existing fee-for-service model, mean that all clients must have 100 percent participation for all the funding to be used – a virtual impossibility. Because funding cannot be transferred from one quarter to another, the state counts on saving about $6.7 million a year from program absences.

The governor’s initial proposal for Fiscal 2022 added that money so that the funding matched the annual authorization for an entire year. Providers, those receiving services, and their families have long complained that the quarterly authorizations do not allow them any flexibility in planning individualized programs.

Read the monitor’s latest report.

Read the consultants’ report on the worker shortage.

Federal Judge Presses RI To Raise DD Worker Wages In Wake Of Severe Shortage Of Services

By Gina Macris

The U.S. District Court has put pressure on the state of Rhode Island to increase the pay of front-line workers who support adults with developmental disabilities in the budget beginning July 1, a year earlier than the disability service agency had planned.

Indeed, two human services officials have recommended that privately-employed front-line workers serving adults with developmental disabilities get $15 an hour – a hike of nearly $2 –in light of a new report that the post-pandemic workforce will fall far short of the number needed for complying with a 2014 civil rights decree.

On April 28, the day after hearing about the worker deficit, Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. issued an order saying the rates must be “reasonably comparable” with those paid in the state’s own group home system and in neighboring Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Massachusetts and Connecticut pay $15.75 and $15.78, respectively.

The state pays its own group home workers an average of $18.46 an hour and sets rates for private providers that allow them to pay front-line employees an average of $13.18 – about five dollars less than the workers make in the state-run group homes, according to figures provided to McConnell.

Moreover, the budget now under consideration by the General Assembly assumes the private sector will absorb more than 100 residents of state-run group homes, without any rate increases.

COVID Exacerbated Worker Shortage

A report submitted to the court April 27 indicated private providers simply don’t have the staff to take on any new clients, let alone meet the demands of the 2014 consent decree by the time it expires in 2024.

The report, compiled by the same consultants the state used for a $1.1 million analysis completed last July, started with the premise that a “stable and skilled workforce is a necessary pre-condition” to implementing changes required by the consent decree.

The consultants concluded that at the end of 2020, the privately-operated system had 1,764 direct care workers, only 62 percent of the 2,845 full time employees it needed to ensure that adults with intellectual and developmental challenges have access to jobs and other activities in their communities, as required by the consent decree. That’s a gap of 1,081 full-time positions.

Currently, the system is staffed at 62 percent of the capacity it would have if all positions were filled, said the consultants. Except for those living in group homes, eligible adults at the end of 2020 generally received less than half the services they got before the pandemic. For those living in family homes, the reduction was calculated at 71 percent, according to the consultants.

The consultants previously worked for the New England States Consortium Systems Organization (NESCSO,) a non-profit regional organization under contract to the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospital (BHDDH) to analyze the developmental disabilities system top-to-bottom – but provide no recommendations.

The latest report, presented to McConnell April 27, was commissioned by the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, (CPNRI), a trade association.

CPNRI seeks an hourly rate of $17.50 an hour for front-line workers and proportional increases for supervisory and other personnel. CPNRI’s executive director, Tina Spears, told McConnell during the court hearing that the proposed $15 hourly rate would only address direct care worker pay.

The pay hike would cost nearly $26.9 million and would require legislative approval in the next two months if the change were to take effect in the budget beginning July 1.

Will The Governor Amend Budget Plan?

During the April 27 court hearing, an independent court monitor in the case, A. Anthony Antosh, said he understood a new budget article is to be drafted in early May.

Neither the office of Gov. Dan McKee nor BHDDH have responded to questions about any top-level support of a $26.9 million expenditure to raise worker pay or how they would fund it.

The Director of the Developmental Disabilities, Kevin Savage, was one of the two officials recommending the $15 hourly wage. The other was Kayleigh Fischer, Director of Budget and Finance at the Executive Office of Health and Human Services.

In January, McConnell raised eyebrows at the State House when he ordered the state to raise direct care wages to $20 an hour by 2024.

Both the House and Senate leadership withdrew their representatives from talks organized by the court monitor about consent decree reforms, which must be up and running by July 1, 2023, a year before consent decree is set to expire.

Instead, legislative spokesmen said at the time, the respective chambers would consider reforms in the context of the budget process.

But with only two months left until the start of the next fiscal year, that process has been silent on developmental disability reform.

McConnell Tightens The Reins

The apparent passivity of the legislative process, combined with the fresh data showing that non-compliance with the consent decree has accelerated during the pandemic, apparently prompted McConnell to tighten the reins in his oversight of the case.

He has been adamant that the state cannot meet the integration requirement at the heart of the consent decree without beginning implementation of a three-year plan in the next budget.

The current system, now ten years old, comes with a reimbursement system built on congregate care – a violation of the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

While BHDDH officials had said they wanted to tackle structural reforms first, McConnell’s latest order accepts the position of providers that they cannot get their clients into the community unless they first have an adequately paid, stable workforce.

Roughly one in three workers leave within a year, and one in five jobs goes begging, with the majority of supervisory staff frequently filling in for front-line workers, according to various reports.

McConnell’s latest order says the state must continue to meet in person or by teleconference with providers and at least one representative of families who direct their own programs to address the immediate fiscal and administrative issues in several court orders dating back to last July. The judge wants a progress report by the end of May, he said.

The annual state budget typically is finalized in early June for the next fiscal year, but McConnell said state officials should continue talking with providers and at least one family representative to prepare for the following two fiscal cycles leading up to the deadline for full compliance with the consent decree in 2024.

In addition, McConnell’s order said the developmental disability caseload should be part of the twice-yearly process the governor and the General Assembly use to determine public assistance obligations beginning in November of this year. He said he will continue to look at job turnover and vacancy rates, as well as client participation rates, to determine the effect of the wages on the system.

Governor McKee’s budget proposal would have the developmental disability caseload become part of the twice-yearly meeting, the “Caseload Estimating Conference,” in November, 2022.

The caseload and revenue-estimating conferences in May and November are considered critical tools in budget-planning.

RI To Give Olmstead Update to Judge Tomorrow

By Gina Macris

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court will get an update Tuesday, April 27, at 1 pm. in a virtual public hearing on Rhode Island’s plan to comply with a 2014 consent decree requiring services that enable adults with developmental disabilities live regular lives in their communities.

McConnell has ordered the state to have a three-year budget plan in place by June 30, with progress reports at the end of April, May, and June.

Without such a plan, Rhode Island cannot meet a 2024 deadline to comply with the consent decree, McConnell has said.

For the court’s instructions on accessing the hearing remotely, click here.

The Zoom Meeting ID is 160 086 6769

The Zoom Password is 515082

Power Resigns as RI BHDDH Director

By Gina Macris

A. Kathryn Power

A. Kathryn Power will leave the top post of the Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) April 9, about thirteen months after she was tapped by former Governor Gina Raimondo to stabilize an agency mired in the problems of the Eleanor Slater Hospital.

Her resignation comes in the middle of a controversy involving the Eleanor Slater Hospital and at a critical time in the implementation of a 2014 civil rights consent decree affecting adults with developmental disabilities. .

In a letter submitted to Gov. Daniel McKee March 28, Power attributed her resignation to a family member’s “recently diagnosed health issues.”

Power’s letter was released by McKee’s office April 5.

In a statement, a spokesman for the governor said, “BHDDH has a critical mission and it will be a priority for the McKee Administration to find a candidate to live up to its values providing high quality care and services for some of Rhode Island’s most vulnerable residents.

“We thank Director Power for her service on the state and federal level and wish her all the best,” the spokesman said in a statement.

In her letter of resignation, Power said she believed she helped “move the organization in the right direction to embrace a more aligned set of programs and services that are highly reflective of the least restricted environment, the most appropriate level of clinical care, and the strong themes of personal choice, a safe, stable living situation, and whole life self-management.”

The controversy at Eleanor Slater Hospital, which Power inherited from a previous administration, started out as a billing issue involving the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that left the state liable for tens of millions of dollars for patients deemed ineligible for federal reimbursement.

The bureaucratic matter has escalated as BHDDH has discharged some Eleanor Slater Hospital patients into what mental health advocates allege are unsafe situations with inadequate safety nets.

Power has more than 30 years’ experience in the mental health field, including a decade-long tenure as the director of BHDDH, from 1993 to 2003, when she left to join the federal government.

She is a former region one administrator for the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

Power said that, just as in her previous tenure at BHDDH, “my priority has been, first and foremost, the well-being and sensitive care of individuals with behavioral health conditions, intellectual/developmental disabilities, and hospital patients.”

In offhand remarks shortly after former Governor Raimondo nominated her to return to BHDDH as second time, Power indicated she had not sought the post but wished to respond to the governor’s call.

BHDDH is entering a critical period of change to services for adults with developmental disabilities as it prepares to comply during the next three years to a 2014 federal civil rights consent decree that calls for the integration of those with intellectual challenges in their communities.

RI DD Budget Emphasizes Quality Improvement, But Services Remain Scarce

By Gina Macris

April 9 marks the beginning of the eighth year of a ten-year period during which Rhode Island has pledged to comply with a federal mandate ensuring that adults with developmental disabilities enjoy meaningful lives in their communities - just like everyone else.

In other words, Rhode Island has three more years to prove to the U.S. Department of Justice that the state no longer violates the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act and has done everything it agreed to do under a federal consent decree signed in April of 2014.

In budgetary terms, the state has just three more fiscal years to accomplish a complete and potentially costly overhaul of services for about 4000 adults with intellectual and deveopmental challenges.

With this timetable in mind, individuals with developmental disabilities, their families, advocates, the private agencies the state relies on to provide services, and a federal judge are all focused on Governor Daniel McKee’s budget proposal for the fiscal year beginning July 1, year eight of the march toward compliance.

Daniel McKee

McKee’s overall state budget recommendation, which allocates $294 million in state and federal funds for developmental disability services, is now in the hands of the state legislature.

Those associated with the developmental disability community hoped to find a higher allocation, but instead the governor’s budget called for an unexpected $10-million reduction in overall spending. Even more puzzling for many, including individuals and families who have gone a year with few, if any, services, was the absence of an hourly wage hike to attract workers back into the field.

The U.S. District Court, which is supervising the state’s effort to comply with the consent decree, has emphasized that a poorly-paid, unstable workforce and inadequate state reimbursement rates to private providers are the biggest issues standing in the way of compliance.

The budget’s $10-million reduction reflects a decline in the caseload, the state developmental disabilities director, Kevin Savage, told a public forum March 22.

Developmental disabilities officials have not produced any caseload figures to back up that claim, and publicly available data indicate the number of people eligible for services has increased and will continue to do so.

Kevin Savage

The governor’s budget also includes a $15 million set-aside for innovation and quality improvement efforts for the first of the final three years of the state’s compliance effort, indicating that officials are prioritizing administrative reforms required by the consent decree.

For example, some of the $15 million would be used to develop an alternate to the existing fee-for-service reimbursement model, according to officials of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

BHDDH officials also say they plan to address the wage issue in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022. They say that timetable could speed up if the state uses federal COVID-19 relief money from the American Rescue Plan, which was enacted just a few days before Governor McKee submitted his budget to the General Assembly.

“Investments in the DD system cannot only about the sufficiency of funding for the system,” BHDDH officials said in a statement issued March 23. “It must also be about how funds in the system are spent and how to use money to drive better outcomes for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities,” they said.

Judge McConnell

The state’s timetable for addressing the issue of low wages would arguably cut it very close for achieving compliance with the consent decree, given the definition of compliance the U.S. Department of Justice has presented before Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court.

DOJ lawyers have said that full or “substantial” compliance means that all the required changes have been up and running smoothly for at least a year before a particular agreement is set to expire.

In this case, Rhode Island will have to have all the required changes up and running smoothly by July 1, 2023 for the state to achieve compliance by June 30, 2024.

BHDDH officials have aimed at completing implementation by December, 2022, giving them just six months to fine tune everything before the clock starts ticking on that critical final year. The consent decree has provisions for extending federal oversight beyond 2024.

As for the here and now, the first court-ordered budget negotiation meeting on McKee’s $294 million proposal for the fiscal year beginning July 1 was scheduled for March 26 between providers, incuding the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), and state officials.

Although Judge McConnell said in a court order in January that direct care worker wages should be raised to $20 an hour, he indicated in a subsequent order that he would accept solutions that are negotiated between the state, providers, and the developmental disabilities community.

McConnell wants the first of three monthly budget progress reports from the state on April 30 – in less than six weeks.

CPNRI is seeking increased reimbursement rates that will allow agencies to raise average direct care pay from $13.08 to $17.50 an hour. The starting rate for workers in the state-run group home system is about $18.50 an hour. BHDDH wants to shift responsibility for those in the state-run system to private service providers next year.

Tina Spears

“Improving capacity and ensuring access to services starts with a well-trained, adequately compensated staff,” Tina Spears, executive director of CPNRI, said in a statement.

“We cannot continue to have the turnover rates (an average of 30 percent a year) the vacancy rates (an average of one in 5 jobs unfilled) and bare bones supervisor and management structures and produce measured outcomes,” she said.

In theory, CPNRI can support reforms to emphasize quality and outcomes, “but until we are able to invest in our workforce, it is not something we can engage in or support,” Spears said.

In a statement March 23, BHDDH officials said Governor McKee’s budget proposal is intended to be a “starting point” in the overall budget process.

A total of $21 million will be dedicated to improving quality and access to services and relieving administrative burdens, according to BHDDH and the Office of Management and Budget. The breakdown includes:

• $7 million for financial incentives to providers to promote quality improvement efforts and improved access to services in communities.

• $4 million for an outcome-based payment methodology that would serve as an alternative to the fee-for-service model that is now in place

• $4 million for the Brown Policy Lab to provide technical assistance and detailed implementation plans to state officials, including funding for two fulltime positions.

In addition, there would be about $6.7 million made available for services that the state has been able to count as savings as part of its quarterly authorizations to individual consumers.

In current the fee-for-service system, any funds not used within a particular three-month period cannot be carried over to the next quarter. Because it’s difficult for individuals to have 100 percent attendance at all scheduled activities - even an afternoon reserved for a doctor’s appointment reduces reimbursement to providers - consumers end up leaving a certain amount of money unspent during a particular quarter.

The money appears in the budget, but through repeated experience, state officials have learned to count it as savings. That funding will now have to be made available as the state switches to annual funding authorization, which is required by the court to give consumers more flexibility in how they arrange their services.

BHDDH says the details of the other initiatives will be worked out with providers.

State officials say that providers can use part of the $4 million set aside for an alternate payment model to increase wages.

But Spears, the CPNRI director, said that option is unrealistic, because providers run the risk of the innovation grant ending without having continued funding to maintain the higher wages. And it’s not clear how many of the three dozen private providers would be able to participate in the development of the alternate payment model, she said.

Reacting to the state officials’ spending plans, Spears said, “At this point, CPNRI does not fully understand how this funding is structured, or how it would be deployed, “

She added: “CPNRI cannot support a budget proposal that does not fully fund services for individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities, nor do we support diverting funds from service delivery to invest in organizational transformation.”

Friday Briefs:

Consent Decree Coordinator Named

• Aryana Huskey has been named Rhode Island’s next Consent Decree Coordinator. She will work with multiple agencies of state government to present a coordinated response to the U.S. District Court on the state’s compliance efforts with a 2014 Olmstead consent decree.
  

  Huskey will begin her new role March 29. She comes to the job “with an extensive background in health and human services, with experience in delivering direct services to vulnerable populations in Rhode Island, and a clinical background,” said Secretary Womazetta Jones and Claire Richards, executive counsel to governor, in an email to various state officials.

  Huskey will be a “significant asset to the team in working with the stakeholders involved in the Consent Decree,” Jones and Richards said. No other details were immediately available.

Save The Date - Mon. March 22

• A virtual public forum hosted by the Rhode Division of Developmental Disabilities will be Monday, March 22, from 3 to 4:30 pm, Advance registration is required with Advocates In Action, which is handling technology and logistics. Participants may register here.

RI Entrepreneur With Autism Competing in FedEx Contest

• Michael Coyne, owner of Red, White, & Brew Coffeehouse in North Smithfield and a graduate of the business development program of the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council, is competing for a $50,000 grand prize in a nationwide small business contest sponsored by FedEx. Your vote will help get Michael to the next level!

  He is featured in an article in RI News Today, which also includes a link for voting.

Judge: RI Must Expand DD Budget Or Risk Olmstead Consent Decree Noncompliance

By Gina Macris

Judge McConnell

Rhode Island will not be able to meet a 2024 deadline for complying with a 7-year-old civil rights agreement unless it begins allocating money now to attract an adequately-paid, skilled workforce to serve adults with developmental disabilities in their communities.

So says Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court in a nine-page order issued March 16 clarifying what it will take to comply with a 2014 consent decree correcting Rhode Island’s violations of the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

Five days ago, on March 11, Governor Daniel McKee submitted a state budget request to the General Assembly that does not propose any rate increase for direct care workers. These workers are employed by the private agencies the state relies on to carry out provisions of the 2014 Olmstead consent decree.

Under the current rates, providers are able to pay front-line workers an average of $13.08 an hour, or $1.58 above the state’s minimum wage of $11.50, McConnell said in the statement, which amounted to a tutorial on the issues affecting compliance.

The $11.50 rate went into effect last October, and McConnell pointed out there are bills pending in the General Assembly for additional raises.

“The functions and responsibilities of staff who provide direct support to adults who have intellectual and developmental disabilities are significantly more challenging than many minimum wage positions,” McConnell said.

In several states the pay of direct support staff is considerably higher than minimum wage, he said. Utah, for example, has set its direct care rate at 72 percent above minimum wage.

He drew a straight line connecting low wages, high turnover, and an inability of the provider agencies to find a well-trained, stable workforce capable of providing an array of services that will enable adults with developmental disabilities to live meaningful lives in their communities in accordance with the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

One in five jobs in private agencies are currently vacant, and agencies report an average annual turnover of about 30 percent, according to a survey by an independent court monitor conducted in February. In addition, 80 percent of adults and families who direct their own programs said they had difficulty finding staff, and 68 percent said they had difficulty retaining staff, according to the monitor.

McConnell’s latest statement underlined an order he issued Jan. 6 which requires the state to raise workers’ wages to $20 an hour by 2024 as part of a comprehensive overhaul of services from center-based group care to one-on-one or one-to-two staffing in the community.

He said the state must collaborate with service providers and advocates in the community to develop a three-year budget strategy for compliance with the consent decree and give him monthly progress reports at the end of April, May, and June.

The judge cited a 2020 report of the state’s own consultants that concluded the provider agencies are financially “fragile and profoundly undercapitalized.”

McConnell also felt it necessary to say that the “entirety of the State” is a party to the consent decree, not merely the state agencies identified in the document.

The McKee administration and the leadership of the House and Senate had no immediate comment on McConnell’s order.

The judge reminded the state that the findings of the U.S. Department of Justice in 2014 cited “multiple concerns” about the state’s failure to comply with the Integration mandate.

Among them were:

• A lack of resources

• Failure of the state’s rate-setting methodology and reimbursement model to promote integrated supported employment and day services

• The inflexibility of the state’s reimbursement model.

McKee’s budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1 includes a proposed $15 million “transformation and transition fund,” but it’s not clear exactly what that money will pay for.

There are five committees already working under the supervision of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals on proposed administrative reforms.

But McConnell has signaled he wants the planning complete by the end of June and the implementation to begin at the start of the new fiscal year in July.

He also noted that the integration mandated by the consent decree are also required by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services if the state is to continue qualifying for federal Medicaid reimbursement under the Home And Community-Based Services (HCBS) Final Rule. Like the consent decree in Rhode Island, that rule gets its authority from the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 1999 clarified the Integration Mandate of the ADA.

“Rhode Island is seven years into the Consent Decree,” McConnell said. (The eighth year begins April 9.)

“With three years remaining, there is significant work still to be completed,” he said in conclusion.

Click here to read Judge McConnell’s order of March 16.

Proposed $10M Cut In RI DD Spending Overshadows Reform Plans

By Gina Macris

Thursday’s initial briefing on Governor Daniel McKee’s proposed budget for adults with developmental disabilities highlighted a $15-million set-aside to plan changes in the system, in response to a federal court order enforcing a 2014 civil rights consent decree.

At the same time, the budget legislation submitted to the General Assembly later in the day, on March 11, shows that overall spending on developmental disabilities would be $10 million less than spent this year.

McKee proposes adding $476,573 to the current developmental disabilities allocation for a total of nearly $304.5 million in federal and state Medicaid money and miscellaneous other sources of funding to close out the current fiscal year June 30.

The budget bill for the next fiscal year cuts overall spending on developmental disabilities to $294.4 million. That total includes $5 million in federal funds and $10 million in state revenue earmarked in the budget for the $15-million “transformation and transition fund” to plan reforms to comply with the consent decree.

The spending cut reflects projected savings from phasing out the costly state-run group home system. Residents would be moved to less costly group homes run by private service providers, according to the budget plan.

But the private agencies, who were in a precarious financial position even before the onset of the COVID pandemic a year ago, have been reluctant to take on additional clients in recent years because the amount the state pays does not cover the actual cost of services, according to repeated testimony before House and Senate finance committees, as well as testimony in federal court.

The state’s own consultants, the non-profit New England States Consortium Systems Organization, highlighted the providers’ fiscal problems and the way the demands on them strained capacity as part of an exhaustive 18-month study completed last summer for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

The core long-term problem, exacerbated by COVID-19, is an inability to find workers for jobs that carry a high degree of responsibility but provide an average starting wage of about $13.18 an hour, less than some fast food and retail chains and less than Amazon, according to testimony before Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the U.S. District Court.

McConnell, who enforces compliance with a 2014 civil rights decree requiring the integration of adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, has ordered the state to raise workers’ wages to $20 an hour by 2024 as part of a comprehensive three-year overhaul of the developmental disabilities system.

The state budget indirectly controls how much the private providers can pay their workers by setting reimbursement rates for various services, but no money in McKee’s proposal is carved out for a rate increase.

Nor does it appear the McKee administration anticipates the heightened level of spending in the next several years that would support the kind of investment needed to comply with requirements of the consent decree to accommodate clients’ desire to be part of their communities, at work and at play. The consent decree gets its authority from the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

McKee’s budget summary anticipates costs for developmental disabilities services will increase 4 percent annually through 2026.

A 4 percent annual increase would come nowhere close to fulfilling the court-ordered hourly wage of $20 an hour which, according to one estimate, would require an budget hike exceeding 45 percent.

The budget summary indicates the state aims to save a net $11.4 million by transferring the operations of the state-run group home system to the privately-run system by October 1.

The state-run system, called Rhode Island Community Living and Supports, (RICLAS) is currently allocated $29.7 million to care for 116 group home residents. The budget summary says transferring RICLAS operations to the private group home system would save $19.2 million in federal-state Medicaid funds in the RICLAS account in the fiscal year beginning July 1.

At the same time, a total of $7.8 million would be added to the private provider system to care for the former RICLAS residents. The budget for the next fiscal year would still leave about $9 million in RICLAS through June 20, 2022. A BHDDH spokesman could not immediately say how long the RICLAS phase-out would take.

The $19.2 million cut in RICLAS would eliminate the equivalent of 50 full-time jobs, mostly from attrition or transfer, the BHDDH spokesman said. RICLAS caregivers are paid a minimum of $18 and receive state employee benefits.

The last time BHDDH announced plans to move large numbers of people in residential care, in 2016, it achieved only a small fraction of the savings the Office of Management and Budget had calculated.

Of 100 persons projected to move from group homes to less costly shared living arrangements in private homes during the first six months of 2016, only 21 made successful matches with families.

Instead of projected savings of $19.3 million, the state recouped a few hundred thousand dollars in that six-month period.

Between March, 2016 and July, 2020, the number of people in shared living arrangements increased from 288 to 399. Since then, the number has decreased to 378, according to BHDDH figures.

The $15-million transformation and transition fund would support a policy and planning effort to carry out reforms required for compliance with the consent decree, according to the budget bill.

BHDDH informed Judge McConnell in February that the changes would take 18 to 24 months to implement, with a target date of December, 2022.

According to the budget language, the fund will be dedicated to:

• Help providers “strengthen” their operations to “support consumers’ needs for living meaningful lives of their choosing in the community”

• Allow providers the chance to participate in a performance-based payment model

• Reduce administrative burdens for providers

• Invest in “state infrastructure” to implement and manage these initiatives

• Prepare for a new way of approaching budgeting of the developmental disabilities caseload in the future.

Beyond the language in the budget bill, there were no details immediately available from BHDDH on what the transformation and transition fund will pay for.

$15 M for RI DD Reform Planned In Next Budget

By Gina Macris

Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKee unveiled a budget plan March 11 that includes $15 million for structural reforms to services for adults with developmental disabilities in the next fiscal year.

Overall, McKee’s has proposed an $11.17 billion budget for Fiscal 2022 which promises to resolve a statewide $336 million deficit while protecting those hardest-hit by the pandemic and helping small business. McKee said the budget “protects Rhode Islanders through an unprecedented public health crisis and lays the foundation for a durable recovery.”

At a noontime virtual briefing for reporters, A. Kathryn Power, director of the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities, and Hospitals, said $10 million of the developmental disabilities reform effort will come from state revenue and another $5 million will be funded by the federal government.

She said BHDDH wants to create a “stronger provider community that is fiscally sustainable.” The reform efforts will increase opportunities for employment and other services for adults with developmental disabilities, she said.

Chief Judge John J. MCConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court has ordered the state to develop a three-year plan for overhauling privately-run services comply with a 21014 consent decree which requires Rhode Island to integrate adults with developmental disabilities in their communities in accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The developmental disabilities budget contains a separate $4.5 million allocation for “alternative placements” for adults with developmental disabilities who live in a state-run group home system called Rhode Island Community Living and Supports.

A ten-percent increase for shared living caregivers also will be in the budget, as part of another group of expenditures intended to encourage more home and community-based services as an alternative to residential care.

Additional information was not immediately available on budget details affecting those with developmental disabilities.

RI General Assembly Will Handle Court-Related DD Issues DD Issues In Regular Budget Talks

By Gina Macris

The pace of discussions for complying with a court-ordered overhaul of Rhode Island’s developmental disability system is expected to pick up as early as next week, when newly elevated Governor Daniel McKee rolls out his budget proposal for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

McKee was sworn in March 2, replacing Gina Raimondo, who resigned as governor after clearing final hurdles in Washington, DC to become Secretary of Commerce. Raimondo’s office said in mid-January that McKee, then Lt. Governor, would be responsible for submitting the budget proposal to the General Assembly.

It remains unclear to what degree, if at all, the proposed state budget will incorporate additional money for initial steps toward compliance with a federal court order enforcing a 2014 civil rights agreement.

While uncertainty about funding hovers, court-ordered discussions organized by the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) have been underway since last August to develop a path forward for providing services that will encourage integration of adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, in accordance with the 2014 consent decree and the Americans With Disabilities Act.

A recent report to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U. S. District Court indicates short-term recommendations are taking shape to address some of the 16 points the judge laid out in a reform agenda last summer.

He gave the state until June 30 to develop a three-year implementation plan that will achieve full compliance with the consent decree by 2024.

Representatives of the House and Senate leadership participated in some court-ordered reform talks until McConnell issued an order Jan. 6 which said the three-year plan must include these specifics:

• a $20 minimum wage for direct care workers by fiscal 2024.

• Incorporation of the developmental disabilities caseload in the formal process for estimating the state’s public assistance obligations for budget calculations, beginning this year.

On March 3, House Speaker Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Dominick Ruggerio issued a new statement on how they will handle legislative issues raised by the reform efforts:

“Specific issues will be analyzed and discussed in legislative committees as part of the public hearing process on pending legislation as well as the upcoming state budget.”

The two leaders continued: “The members of the General Assembly care deeply about individuals with developmental disabilities and ensuring a strong continuum of care, and the Senate President and House Speaker believe that we have an obligation as a society to provide strong services and supports for all vulnerable Rhode Islanders.”

The leadership had withdrawn from reform talks out of concern that their representatives’ participation could be perceived as tacit approval of change outside the legislative process, according to separate letters sent to McConnell Feb. 3.

Shekarchi’s and Ruggerio’s statement did not specifically mention the direct care worker wages or making the developmental disabilities numbers part of the twice-yearly Caseload Estimating Conference, the budgeting tool used by the governor and the legislature.

Development of a new approach for determining how to support the individualized plans of the developmentally disabled population is at the heart of the overhaul. The existing fee-for-service system was designed 10 years ago for congregate care, where one or two staff members could oversee as many as ten clients in a day care center or sheltered workshop. The U.S. Department of Justice found that model violated the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

In November, McConnell heard testimony that the current funding ceiling for the private provider system, roughly $268.7 million in federal/state Medicaid money, will not support integrated services, which are much more labor-intensive — and thus, more costly — than congregate care. The cost of correcting the non-compliance could increase the developmental disabilities budget by nearly 50 percent, according to one estimate.

Because of the uncertainty over funding, five workgroups organized by BHDDH are focusing on short-term changes that can ease administrative burdens on providers and make the state bureaucracy more user-friendly for the individuals served and their families, according to a progress report submitted to McConnell at the end of February.

According to the report, BHDDH expects to have detailed information by March 31 on:

• shifting from quarterly to annual per-person budget authorizations

• streamlining dozens of private provider billing codes, many of which require documentation of staff time in 15-minute increments for each client served

• simplifying the process of writing each client’s annual service plan “to reduce repeated questions, frustrations, and errors requiring correction and intervention.”

The report recommends adding a second assessment or new questions or criteria to improve the accuracy of the standardized Supports Intensity Scale-A, (SIS-A) interview, used to determine service needs and funding levels.

Improved assessments would reduce reliance on appeals. Interviewers also need training on cultural differences, it said.

Additional recommendations include:

• a training program for parents on how to approach the SIS-A, which has been the subject of frequent complaints over the years from parents

• clarification of the process for appealing funding determinations made as a result of the SIS-A, and developing ways to more quickly resolve appeals

• consolidation of separate applications for Medicaid and for Medicaid-funded services into one process

• a request for a waiver from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for Medicaid eligibility redeterminations for persons with developmental disabilities, who have life-long conditions.

The report said long-term revision of the fiscal and reimbursement system will be implemented by December, 2022.

The workgroups developing the recommendations include both state officials and representatives of the community, including individuals who themselves receive services, families, advocates, and service providers.

The groups’ recommendations are reviewed by the appropriate department-level directors and other key officials, according to the report.

Once final recommendations are analyzed and decisions made by the state, a “cohesive workplan” that will be submitted to McConnell on or before June 30 as required by an order the judge issued last July 30, the report said.

The Arc Rhode Island Comes Back Into Action

By Gina Macris

The Arc Rhode Island, a once powerful advocacy organization for those with developmental disabilities, has come back into action during the last two years under the wing of The Arc of the United States.

Joanna Scocchi

The state organization, which had been dormant for a decade, has grown into an office of four during the last two years. Under the leadership of Joanna Scocchi, it has revived not only its legislative advocacy but it offers support to parents facing special education issues and facilitates partnership-building activities in the community, sometimes one person at a time.

A case in point is the young man who agreed to go out to a Saturday lunch in Newport with his brother and his brother’s girlfriend only on the condition that he could be back home in front of his computer screen in time for his late afternoon “Chat Saturday,” an online social circle.

“People look forward to the day they will have a circle,” says Ken Renaud, associate director of The Arc.

“Chat Saturday” is but one facet of “Circles of Connections,” The Arc’s person-to-person response to the isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic that Renaud said he knew “was going to be really intense for the people with developmental disabilities and their families.”

Ken Renaud

Circles of Connections, which had a soft launch last fall, matches small numbers of people with facilitators around common interests, like special education eligibility and advocacy, family dynamics, and various facets of the transition from school to adulthood, a period that is commonly fraught with anxiety for both young people and their families.

The Circles have generated spinoffs, like a virtual movie outing that grew out of Chat Saturday and a group session with a therapist organized by a participant in another Circle called “The Other Side of Grief,” Renaud said.

“ I like it when you have that seed of an idea, and you plant the seed, and it germinates, and you see it grow,” he said of the evolution of Circles of Connections during the last six months.

The “Circles” concept could serve as a model for building friendships after the pandemic, says Kevin Savage, the state’s Director of Developmental Disabilities.

Darlene Faust

“People are genuinely connecting with one another,” Savage said, noting that some of the groups are led by adults with disabilities.

“The Arc of Rhode Island and others who have supported this effort deserve enormous credit,” he said.

Darlene Faust, facilitator for a Circle focused on healthy relationships, agreed with Savage, saying her experience has been gratifying on a personal and professional level.

The healthy relationship Circle has provided a “safe way for people to socialize and have new friendships and actually take part in some meaningful conversations,” she said. It has “redefined the way that I want to do the work that I do post-Covid.” Faust works as Director of Self-Advocacy and Work Preparedness at Looking Upwards, a service provider.

The connections the Circles make on a personal level reflect the core mission of The Arc as a catalyst for family support and advocacy efforts intended to make the community a welcoming place for people with developmental disabilities.

In 2018, the national organization tapped Scocchi to lead the Rhode Island effort, at first on a part-time basis. Scocchi had moved to Rhode Island from New Jersey twelve years earlier as the mother of a young child with developmental disabilities. A former CEO of a human resources staffing agency, she was then in her forties. She had never dealt with special education issues.

But her advocacy for her son grew into into a one-woman non-profit organization called Rhode Island Advocacy For Children, providing one-on-one help for about 200 families a year.

When The Arc of the United States approached her about re-starting a state chapter, Scocchi insisted on bringing the special education advocacy program with her.

Scocchi’s organization continues as a program of The Arc, now under the direction of Mary Lou Rossi. It fits right in with the vision of the national organization.

Peter Berns

“Our focus as an organization is all people, not just those receiving services through the developmental disability system,” Peter Berns, CEO of The Arc of the United States, explained in a telephone interview.

“So much of the advocacy is focused on the service system, but on a national average, only 20 percent who need help get it through the service system,” he said.

People with developmental disabilities should be valued members of their communities, with the supports they need to realize their potential and have a secure future, he said.

Scocchi says she is driven by a passion for equity and has received invaluable support from the national organization, as well as help from local leaders in tapping into an increasingly collaborative network. At the top of The Arc’s legislative agenda this year is a bill, recently introduced by Rep. Lauren Carson, D-Newport, and others, to create an ombudsman charged with ensuring school districts meet special education requirements.

In addition, adult service providers, advocates, and the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) have begun working closer together to respond to both the COVID-19 pandemic and to the demands of the 2014 Olmstead consent decree. Since last August, five committees organized by BHDDH have been working on court-ordered plans to overhaul the developmental disability service system to meet the inclusive goals mandated by the consent decree.

Scocchi spends a lot of time on the phone or in online meetings, keeping connected on a weekly basis, or more frequently, with other disability organizations, BHDDH officials, and Arc leaders in Washington.

Renaud, meanwhile, is reviving a mentorship program for emerging leaders in disability-related fields to lay the groundwork for the kinds of partnerships that will be necessary to open doors in the community for adults with developmental disabilities who are trying to plan their own futures, as required by the consent decree.

For example, disability rights advocates need to enlist the business sector as a whole to support job opportunities mandated by the consent decree for those facing intellectual and developmental challenges, Renaud said.

Called the Rhode Island Facilitator Forum, the new mentorship program had its first online meeting Feb. 12 with about 30 participants, Renaud said. He ran a similar group as part of PAL (Parents And Friends for Alternate Living), an advocacy organization that fell victim to the severe state budget cuts of 2011 that adversely affected those with developmental disabilities and their families across the board.

“I can’t think of a better time to bring this back together,” Renaud said. In the months ahead, the program will work with the Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council, the Sherlock Center for Disabilities at Rhode Island College, and experts from outside the state to focus on ways to create a welcoming community for those with developmental disabilities, Renaud said.

The Arc in Rhode Island had been dormant since 2008, the twilight of a forceful movement in which the state became the first in the nation to deinstitutionalize people with developmental disabilities.

By 2014, with Rhode Island ranked at the bottom of states for its support of people with developmental disabilities, community leaders begun approaching The Arc of the United States to help revive the organization and its role as advocate. Scocchi opened an office in North Kingstown on a part-time basis in 2019 and went fulltime a year later.

The Arc of the United States works with the Rhode Island chapter as a full-fledged affiliate of the national organization, an approach CEO Berns said is intended to buttress it against adversity long term. With the national organization handling operations, including the website and financing, the four-person staff led by Scocchi and Renaud can focus on advocacy, education, and support.

Berns said the same approach has been used in reviving statewide chapters in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia, as well as the District of Columbia, where the national headquarters is located.

“We’re pleased in how it has played out in all four states,” Berns said.

“In a relatively short period of time, we’ve gone from The Arc having faded out of view in all those states,” he said, “to re-establishing a presence for education and advocacy for those with developmental disabilities.”

The biggest challenge in all four states is for the chapters to become financially self-supporting by attracting public and private funding from government agencies, business and foundations within their jurisdictions, he said.

“We are making progress in that area,” he said, although he did not offer specifics. Berns indicated that if the affiliate model is successful, it could be used in the 10 states where The Arc does not have a state chapter or office.

RI House And Senate Withdraw From Budget-Related Consent Decree Talks

By Gina Macris

Both the Rhode Island House and Senate have withdrawn from negotiations on a three-year budget plan to overhaul the state’s developmental disabilities system and comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

The development of such a plan had been recommended by an independent federal court monitor as part of a fiscal analysis he submitted in November to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr of the U.S. District Court. McConnell oversees the state’s efforts to get into compliance with a 2014 consent decree in which the state agreed to correct violations of the ADA by 2024.

Members of the House and Senate joined the talks in December, but the leadership of both chambers of the General Assembly decided to withdraw after McConnell made the development of the three-year budget plan the topic of a court order Jan. 6.

Dominic Ruggerio

“We are concerned that continued involvement of the Senate could be perceived as tacit approval of the entire body without the proper processes that allows for meaningful member input,” Senate President Dominic Ruggerio and Majority Leader Michael McCaffrey said in a Feb. 3 letter to McConnell.

The House used similar language in a separate letter.

Ruggerio and McCaffrey wrote, “We appreciate the work of the Court and the process by which you are moving to identify and operationalize solutions to accomplish the goals of the consent decree.”

“We anticipate that the Court will order the state to undertake a course of action, and at that time, in our role as the appropriating body, we will further engage in this process,” the Senate leadership told Judge McConnell.

Last July, McConnell ordered an overhaul of the entire developmental disabilities service system to end segregated care and encourage the integration of individuals with intellectual challenges in their communities.

In response to that July order, representatives of the state’s developmental disability agency began working with families, providers, and advocates on a 16-point agenda for reforming the way services are delivered and the rules for reimbursing the private agencies which provide direct care.

McConnell’s order on Jan. 6 focused on the budgetary implications, memorializing the main points of the monitor’s analysis, including a requirement that the state raise the wages of direct care workers to $20 an hour by Fiscal 2024.

In the same order, McConnell also said the actual costs of developmental disabilities services must be included in a state budgeting procedure known as the Caseload Estimating Conference, which allows the state to get a better handle on its financial obligations for entitlement programs.

Joseph Shekarchi

In a statement responding to a request for specifics prompting the withdrawal, Shekarchi, newly elected Speaker of the House, said, “It would be best to answer these questions with an overall clarification that the action by the House is not a repudiation of any of the specific ideas being discussed.“

When the House was invited to join talks in December, the leadership expected that its representatives would participate in discussions about issues of concern for service providers and options for what might be included in the Governor’s upcoming budget. House leadership “was happy to have someone included,” Shekarchi said.

Because the Jan. 6 order contained “much more prescriptive policy remedies than expected, the House felt that further participation might be perceived as delegation of its legislative authority,” the statement said.

It was out of an abundance of caution that the House withdrew, he said.

The Senate leadership’s letter said it was “unclear if the Senate’s inclusion was designed to guide discussions and outcomes or merely for observation.”

Ruggerio and McCaffrey said “the Senate values continued dialogue and looks forward to reviewing any proffered solutions in an open, public committee process.”

Similarly, the letter from the House leadership said they encourage continued dialogue and “are eager to have one or more of our committees review potential solutions in an open and public process.”

Individual Senators may continue to participate in the current talks, but are acting on their own behalf and do not represent the Senate as a body, Ruggerio and McCaffrey said.

Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, has attended the negotiations and is widely known as an advocate for the integration of adults with developmental disabilities.

McConnell, meanwhile, has scheduled a private conference Feb. 11 with the monitor, Antosh, and lawyers representing the U.S. Department of Justice, the state, and several service providers.

Federal Judge Orders RI DD System Overhaul, $7 Worker Pay Hikes By 2024

By Gina Macris

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court has tightened his reins on Rhode Island’s developmental disability system in an order that gives the state two and a half years to raise the hourly wages of direct care workers nearly $7, to $20 an hour, as part of a sweeping overhaul to comply with the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Through its budget, the state controls the parameters of wages for front-line caregivers, who make an average of $13.18 an hour working for some three dozen private agencies under license from the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

McConnell’s order, issued Jan. 6, distills recent recommendations of an independent court monitor, who said that Rhode Island cannot fully comply with a 2014 civil rights decree unless it overhauls its entire developmental disabilities system and increases funding. The civil rights consent decree says federal oversight is to expire June 30, 2024, but only if corrections of civil rights violations have been in place for at least a year.

Low front-line worker pay is widely regarded as the biggest weakness of the state’s developmental disability system. Provider agencies, as well as those independently coordinating their own services or the services of loved ones, have found it increasingly difficult to recruit and retain staff, who often can make more in fast food restaurants and retail stores, or at an Amazon distribution center. The staffing situation has only been exacerbated by the COVId-19 pandemic in the last year.

With the 2024 deadline in mind, McConnell’s order gives the state about six months to develop a three-year budget plan that will subsequently reach the $20 hourly worker rate. That pay increase would be effective in the 2024 fiscal year, which begins July 1, 2023.

The budget plan also must provide:

• Proportional wage increases for other categories of support staff, like job developers and supervisors

• Increased funding to address the costs of moving from a segregated system of care to one that integrates adults with developmental disabilities in their communities for work and leisure time.

• A per-capita amount for technology. Mobile phones and other hardware would provide internet connectivity still inaccessible to many adults with developmental disabilities as well as provide other kinds of assistance, depending on individual needs.

• Increased funding for transportation, found to be a barrier for many in getting to work or attending community events.

• Increased funding for the individualized planning that is supposed to drive purposeful services designed to help people lead meaningful lives.

Other than the direct care wages, McConnell’s order specified no dollar amounts for the three-year fiscal plan, which he said must be completed before the next fiscal year’s budget is finalized. (Plans aside, the General Assembly can only authorize funding one year at a time.)

The judge said the amounts must be negotiated between state officials and representatives of the community, including “individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, families, organizations that provide services and supports, and other stakeholders.”

And beginning this year, McConnell said, the legislative and executive branches must take into account the developmental disabilities caseload in calculating its public assistance obligations in the semi-annual Caseload Estimating Conference, which occurs in May and November in conjunction with the Revenue Estimating Conference. The costs of the developmental disabilities services historically have been omitted from caseload estimating conferences, which are used by the executive and legislative branches in annual budget planning.

In addition, the judge’s order said the state has until June to complete the revision of “all aspects of the developmental disabilities and funding system,” a reference to basic assumptions and regulations that for the last decade have been designed to promote group or congregate care. That effort has been underway since last July. Its parameters are already subject to a separate court order.

Since 2016, state officials have strived to provide pilot programs to support regular employment and increase community activities for adults with developmental disabilities, but it has become increasingly clear that the existing level of funding and the associated reimbursement rules for private service providers will not support system-wide change.

A full discussion of the issues reflected in the judge’s order are contained in a recent fiscal analysis submitted to the court by the court monitor.