Historic Investment in DD Passes RI House

By Gina Macris

UPDATE: The Rhode Island House of Representatives approved developmental disabilities reform as part of a $14-billion state budget on a 68-3 vote June 9, sending it to the Senate.

The Rhode Island House of Representatives is expected to vote Friday, June 9, on a whopping $75 million for the state to reorganize its services for adults with developmental disabilities to comply with a federal consent decree deadline in a year’s time.

Total spending for developmental disabilities would jump from about $377.3 million to $469.1 million, an increase of about $91.8 million in an overall budget of $619.6 million for the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals. Developmental disabilities spending includes about $32.4 million for a state-run network of group homes, which is receiving an increase of about $3.1 million.

The reorganization includes a wage increase for frontline workers, from an average of $19 to an average of about $22 an hour, and expanded funding for more staffing to permit all daytime services to be offered in the community.

All adults receiving support from the Division of Developmental Disabilities — roughly 4,000 individuals — will be eligible for employment-related services in addition to other assistance included in basic individual budgets.

With several federal court orders in play, the House Finance Committee voted June 2 to send the massive investment in services for adults with developmental disabilities to the full House as part of an overall $14-billion state budget.

The new developmental disabilities system, which promotes the treatment of each participating adult as a unique individual, would replace an approach that incentivized group care in day centers and sheltered workshops and depressed the wages of caregivers for a decade.

In 2014, the state accepted a federal Department of Justice finding that its system for serving adults with development disabilities violated the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Rhode Island consented to overhaul that system within ten years, a transition requiring services to be individualized and made available in the community at large which, in almost all cases, is the least restrictive environment that is therapeutically appropriate.

But the state made only incremental changes until 2021, after Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. of the U.S. District Court found that a decade-long shortage of workers, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, was the single biggest barrier to implementation of the consent decree.

With average wages then hovering around $13.18 a year, McConnell issued an order in January, 2021, saying the state must raise the minimum wage for direct care workers to $20 an hour by 2024. But the needle did not move until the judge issued another order requiring the state to negotiate with private service providers and families operating their own programs to arrive at an interim pay increase in the forthcoming state budget.

The General Assembly raised the minimum wage to $15.75 an hour on July 1, 2021 and then to $18 an hour effective July 1, 2022. The budget up for the House vote tonight would raise the minimum wage to $20 an hour, the last step in complying with McConnell’s court order.

Other court orders resulted in a rate review of the entire developmental disabilities system and an initiative to attract new workers to better-paying and more career-oriented jobs in caregiving, among other things.

There appears to have been ongoing negotiations between the ,court and the state on the budget continuing as late as April, when Governor Dan McKee amended his original proposal and asked the General Assembly for more money to fund 100 percent community-based care instead of 60 percent. Until then, the plan was to continue offering 40 percent of services in group day care centers, an approach which is less staff-intensive than providing individual outings in the community.

Still to be answered is whether the state, through its private service providers, can translate the expanded funding into a smooth-running inclusive new system of services in time to meet the consent decree deadline of June 30, 2024.

The director of the trade organization for most private service providers has asked the public to urge their legislators to support funding not only for adults with developmental disabilities but also for vulnerable children.

The trade organization, the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), is part of a coalition of organizations supporting an estimated 100,000 people eligible for various home and community-based services that have experienced the same labor shortages as the sector focused on adults with developmental disabilities.

Companion bills in the House and Senate would allocate $200 million of federal-state Medicaid funding to shore-up home and community-based services statewide during the coming year while the state’s health insurance commissioner completes a rate review similar to the one conducted for developmental disabilities. Those bills have not advanced.

The CPNRI director, Jenna Husted, applauded the “major investments in adults with disabilities and those that support them.”

“We are, however, concerned about the lack of investment in children with disabilities. Providers of children with disabilities are facing unique challenges and it is our responsibility to provide them the necessary support to thrive.

“We urge legislators to protect the major investment in adults with disabilities, and include investments for children with disabilities,” Husted said. “Together, we will become a more inclusive State.”

The House session is expected to begin at 2:30 p.m., according to the House Calendar.

Consent Decree Drives Proposed Hike In RI DD Spending

By Gina Macris

Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee would add more than $30 million to developmental disabilities spending to raise starting pay for direct care workers to $20 an hour, hike dozens of reimbursement rates to private service providers, and add ten new staff to help implement a 2014 consent decree.

The pay increase, costing $29.9 million in federal-state Medicaid funding, would be the third annual hike intended to help private agencies and the so-called “self-directed” population managing their own service programs. The wage increase would comply with a federal court order that dates back two years.

In 2021, when the starting wage for direct care workers was $13.18 an hour, Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. ordered the state to raise wages to $20 an hour by 2024, calling a lack of staff the single biggest barrier to implementing the day-to-day requirements of the consent decree, albeit not the only one.

In 2022, with pay raised to $15.75 an hour, the Rhode Island system added 106 new direct care workers from January through June.

On July 1, 2022, the starting pay increased again to $18 an hour, and the state, prodded by the court, launched a workforce initiative to recruit candidates for direct care jobs. In September alone, the system filled 146 vacancies, according to data collected by an independent court monitor.

Yet there were still 693 vacancies in some three dozen private agencies and as many as 1,000 job openings among self-directed consumers and families, the monitor reported in early November.

overview of proposed DD spending - RI Department of Administration

In all, McKee seeks a total of nearly $417.4 million for all developmental disability services in the fiscal year beginning July 1, including slightly more than $385 million for the privately-run system, the backbone of consent decree compliance. That figure for private agency and self-directed services represents a bump of about $32.2 million over the current allocation of about $352.9 million.

A parallel network of state-run group homes would get $32.4 million in the next budget, or almost $1.8 million more than the current funding level of $30.8 million.

The budget for the next fiscal year, July 1,2023-June 30, 2024, will finance the state’s final push to comply with the consent decree before the deadline on June 30, 2024.

The state agreed in 2014 that by mid-2024, it would eliminate sheltered workshops paying sub-minimum wages and move away from isolated day care centers. Instead, there would be a de-centralized network of individualized services enabling adults with developmental disabilities to become integrated in their communities.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has said that Rhode Island will likely miss the 2024 deadline if it moves at the current pace. The DOJ cited numerous factors contributing to a lack of services, particularly the individualized services in the community that are the cornerstone of the consent decree. A far-reaching federal court order issued Dec. 6 lists some 50 requirements that must be completed by the deadline on June 30, 2024.

McKee wants the new consent decree implementation staff on board as early as possible.

A spokesman for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) said the department hopes to complete the hiring process by the fourth quarter, which runs from April through June. The cost for these added workers would be $203,275 for the first full year, taking into account federal Medicaid reimbursements and savings from staff turnover in other positions, according to McKee’s executive summary of the spending plan.

Eight of the ten positions will be permanently added to the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD), the BHDDH spokesman said.

The DDD jobs include:

• an “interdepartmental project manager”

• a “chief of staff for development training and continuous quality improvement”

• ·an “associate administrator for community services”

• five positions promoting community development as it relates to adults with developmental disabilities

The salaries will range from $66,162 to $95,552 a year, the BHDDH spokesman said.

Two other employees not attached to BHDDH will help implement an outside consultant’s recommendations for reimbursement rates for private providers.

Undertaking a rate review itself was part of a court order issued in October, 2021. Consultants disclosed preliminary recommendations last September that called for increases ranging from about 25 percent to 97 percent in dozens of reimbursement categories to private providers.

But McKee said in an executive summary of the budget that the consultant’s report is “currently under review and may further increase the recommended amount of financing” allocated to the private developmental disabilities system.

Among other actions, the Dec. 6 court order requires the state to identify successful pilot programs promoting integration that have been developed by private service providers during the past year and make those programs available to all those who want them, regardless of the way consultants have structured reimbursements to the private sector.

The consent decree has brought more transparency to budgeting by generating pressure on the General Assembly to include adults with developmental disabilities in the biannual caseload estimating conference, a public process used to project the state’s obligations for public assistance, like food stamps. Developmental disability costs were added in 2021.

The most recent caseload estimating conference, in November, projected there will be $8.5 million less in reimbursements to private service providers than budgeted for the current fiscal year because the population is expected to use fewer support services than initially budgeted.

McKee’s proposal takes the caseload estimating conference projections into account, as well as other related costs, in reducing developmental disabilities services by about $4.4 million, from about $352.9 million to about $348.5 million, in the current fiscal year.

The caseload estimating conference also highlighted the fact that consumers and families often must appeal individual budget allocations to get needed services – a feature of the current reimbursement system which the federal court has cited as a weakness.

Projections for the current fiscal year include $22.8 million in successful appeals, or $5.8 million more than budgeted. An independent court monitor has said consumers should not have to make lengthy appeals to get the individualized services to which they are entitled.

The consent decree draws its authority from the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision, re-affirmed the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, requiring public services for all persons with disabilities to help them lead regular lives in the their communities.

Developmental disabilities funding makes up about two thirds of the overall BHDDH budget, which is currently funded at about $597.1 million. McKee would raise the BHDDH total to about $619.6 million in the next fiscal year, with more than half the revenue coming from federal Medicaid reimbursements.

RI BHDDH Seeks $20 Starting Wage For DD Workers

By Gina Macris

The state agency overseeing Rhode Island’s services for adults with developmental disabilities is asking for a $20 minimum hourly wage for direct care workers, effective July 1.

The hike was ordered by a federal judge in 2021 to go into effect by 2024, causing consternation in the General Assembly at the time. More recently, outside consultants concurred with the minimum $20 rate.

The request is part of an overall $430.1 million budget proposal for developmental disabilities that the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) has submitted to Governor Dan McKee.

McKee is to submit his spending and revenue plan for the state to the General Assembly on Jan. 19.

RI BHDDH

The BHDDH request for developmental disabilities would add $9.3 million to the current budget of $383.4 million to close a budget deficit in the current fiscal year, ending June 30. About $6 million of the shortfall comes from a state-operated network of group homes.

An additional $37.4 million would be needed to reach total funding of $430.1 million for developmental disabilities in the next fiscal year, beginning July 1.

Spending on developmental disabilities makes up nearly two thirds of the entire BHDDH budget, which is currently $597.1 million. For the next fiscal year, BHDDH is seeking nearly $621.4 million, an increase of of about $24.3 million.

Slightly less than half of BHDDH’s operating revenue comes from state tax dollars, with the rest funded by federal Medicaid money. The overall figures also include some other miscellaneous funding sources.

In a cover letter to the governor in November, BHDDH director Richard Charest said the “Division of Developmental Disabilities continues its commitment in complying with the terms of the 2014 federal consent decree and providing integrated employment and day services.”

A series of substantial wage increases is intended to help stem a worker shortage that prevents eligible adults from gaining access to services to which they are entitled, particularly during the the recovery from the COVID-19 lockdown.

Under pressure from the U.S. District Court, which oversees the consent decree, the General Assembly increased hourly wages from $13.18 to $15.75 in 2021, and then to the current $18.00, which became effective July 1, 2022.

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. ordered state to hit $20 an hour by 2024. And the outside rate reviewers included the $20 minimum wage in preliminary recommendations made public last September. They also recommend a minimum rate of $22.14 in the fiscal year that would begin July 1, 2024.

As much as the state has been criticized by providers, advocates, and consumers and their families during the last decade for underfunding developmental disabilities, adding more money will not solve all the compliance problems the state has with the consent decree.

 Since 2014, the Department of Justice and the federal court system have sought to oversee a cultural shift in the delivery of services which will enable adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live regular lives in their communities, exercising choice about where they work and spend leisure time.

In a hearing in U.S. District Court in December, a lawyer for the Department of Justice said the state appeared unlikely to meet a deadline in mid-2024 for full compliance with the consent decree. Amy Romero of the U.S. Attorney’s office in Rhode Island expressed concern about a lack of individualization or “person-centered-ness,” and inadequate accessibility to services in a number of categories, including supports for teenagers making the transition to adulthood.

Romero’s criticism, as well as that of an independent court monitor, stemmed only partly from a chronic shortage of underpaid direct care workers who make up the front line of consent decree compliance.

How the state spends the money, including the degree to which services are individualized, is entwined in the rate review by outside consultants that has been underway for nearly a year. The rate review - itself court-ordered – has not yet been finalized. It covers not only the reimbursement rates to private service providers but the state administrative structures governing the spending.

Preliminary recommendations from the consultants indicated the state wants to continue the existing fee-for-service system, now 11 years old, with many of the same administrative features, including billing for daytime services in 15-minute units and a relatively limited number of individual funding options.

One big change is a proposal to make job-related supports available to all adults with developmental disabilities as an add-on to basic individual budgets.

Officials are working to finish the rate review by the end of January, according to a newsletter of the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) issued Jan. 13.

In the same newsletter, DDD announced that it will advertise eight new positions to help the state fully comply with the consent decree by mid-2024.

The expanded staff will “assist the Division in developing improved communication with the I/DD community and stakeholders, increasing our training capabilities, and enhancing our support for community access and the self-direction population.” (The self-directed population includes individuals and families who design their own programs – roughly a quarter of the caseload of about 4,000 individuals eligible for services.)

The newsletter offered no additional details about the new positions, nor were any immediately available from BHDDH.

The privately-run developmental disabilities system, which includes the self-directed group and private agencies running group homes and offering daytime services, is currently funded for $352.9 million, with about $173.4 million coming from federal Medicaid reimbursements. BHDDH wants $40.7 million more for the private system from both federal and state Medicaid funds, including about $2.9 million to cover a shortfall in the fiscal year ending June 30.

A parallel network of state-run group homes, currently funded for nearly $30.6 million, would need an increase of about $6 million to balance its budget for the current fiscal year, according to the BHDDH budget request. Funding for fiscal 2024, beginning July 1, would continue at the higher level, about $36.5 million.

The administration of former governor Gina Raimondo had tried to privatize the state group homes, but private operators made it clear they were in no financial position to take on the responsibility for additional residents. The plan also faced opposition from unionized state employees who staff the state system, called Rhode Island Community Living and Support (RICLAS). Governor McKee has made it clear he will continue to support RICLAS.

Judge Tightens Reins On RI DD Consent Decree Compliance

By Gina Macris

It’s been eight years and eight months since Rhode Island signed an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to improve the lives of adults with developmental disabilities by ending their segregation in sheltered workshops and day care centers.

But with 16 months remaining for the state to fully comply with the consent decree, the state’s progress falls far short of the goals, according to the report of an independent court monitor made public Dec. 6.

On that day, U.S. District Court Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. incorporated the monitor’s wide-ranging recommendations into an order outlining some 50 tasks to be completed before June 30, 2024, when the 2014 consent decree expires.

McConnell also scheduled a public hearing on the status of the consent decree for Monday, Dec. 12, at 2 p.m.

Parts of the order will require additional changes to a preliminary review of rates for developmental disability services that was made public in September.

The recommendations of the monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, provide a snapshot of the current system:

1. Forty-four percent of those who once toiled in sheltered workshops, and 33 percent of those who spent daytime hours in centers, have found jobs in the community since the consent decree was signed, far below expected levels.

2. About one third of adults – and more than half of young people moving from high school to adult services – do not participate in community activities. The consent decree promised a 40-hour week filled with work and activities that are purposeful to each of some 4000 persons eligible for services.

 Antosh recommended a way for the state to meet its targets: bring system-wide funding to existing pilot programs that have shown success in employment and integrated community activities – the fruits of some $12 million in “Transformation Grants” made during the past year.

Judge McConnell has given the state until next July to put that funding in place – and to figure out how to fit it into the rate review or find some other way to do it.

The monitor said that “individuals and families report uncertainty and lack of information” about the consent decree, the Employment First policy emphasizing competitive employment for those with disabilities, and community activities.

Families of young people moving from high school to adult services say they generally are “overwhelmed by the process and report not having sufficient information or support,” Antosh said.

The court ordered the state to put a streamlined application for adult services in place and to give every family a consistent point of contact to serve as a guide during the transition. These are two more of the 50 tasks the state must complete in 2023 or 2024 to comply with the consent decree.

Antosh put the state on notice that his final evaluation of the state’s compliance with the consent decree in will include an assessment of its impact on people’s lives. Positive impact will be measured by at least two thirds of a random sample of individuals reporting a “community-based life, achievement of personal goals, and satisfaction” during independent interviews, he said.

In the last few years, Judge McConnell has recognized that a key problem in the implementation of the consent decree has been a lack of front-line staff, who, until mid-2021, were paid an average of $13.18 an hour, too little to attract an adequate workforce.

The General Assembly increased wages from $15.75 to $18 an hour in July, and McConnell has ordered that rate to increase to $20 an hour by 2024.

In recent months, the state has stepped up its recruitment efforts, with 146 new hires reported in September by a recruitment consultant, Antosh said.

McConnell ordered those recruitment efforts to continue, with emphasis on helping individuals and families who direct their own services. The state’s figures indicate this group now makes up about a quarter of all those receiving developmental disability services.

Among other things, the state must explore the possibility of a mechanism to provide health benefits to for those who work on an hourly basis for individual families by July, 2023.

McConnell’s court order also signals that neither he nor Antosh are in agreement with some features of a recent rate review that would update the fee-for-service reimbursement system the state uses to pay private service providers who deliver the actual day-to-day supports to adults with developmental disabilities.

A spokesman for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) said Dec. 1 that “changes have been made to the recommendations” since they were presented to the public in September on the basis of “public comments, including the Court Monitor’s and those from other stakeholders.”

“These final recommendations are now under review and will be made public after review,” the spokesman said.

The rate review recommendations as they now appear on the health policy webpage of the outside consultant, the Burns & Associates Division of Health Management Associates, (here) cover everything from assessment of need to the allocation of individual budgets and billing requirements, in addition to revisions to dozens of rates that would be used to continue a fee-for-service system called Project Sustainability, introduced in 2011.

The Burns & Associates recommendations would continue requiring service providers to bill in 15-minute units from an extensive menu of rates for services provided during the day, despite recommendations from a study group and the monitor that the detailed –and costly - paperwork should be eliminated.

Now, as part of McConnell’s action Dec. 6, the state has been ordered, in bold type for emphasis, to “simplify the billing process” through the rate review by July, 2023.

McConnell’s order also elevates several other recommendations Antosh has made touching on the rate review, directly or indirectly.

For example, the state has made it clear that it plans to continue using a standardized interview called the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) to determine individual support needs, with the addition of supplemental questions to capture particular behavioral or medical issues.

Antosh noted that while the state may continue to use the SIS, the court has previously directed it to explore alternate assessment methods. “Now might be the time,” he wrote.

He also said there should be a funding mechanism that allows individuals and families to “identify unique needs and costs” that go beyond the results of any standardized interview and supplemental questions. Nor should Individuals have to file appeals to get the additional funding (as is now the case), he said.

Antosh discussed “person-centeredness,” how the bureaucracy should enable individuals, with the support of families and advocates, to become empowered to take charge of their own lives, setting short-term and long-term goals and realizing them through day-to-day supports.

A key to this empowerment is first making a service plan based on individual needs and then matching funding to that plan, with an independent case manager or facilitator guiding the process, Antosh said.

Currently, individual service plans are designed to fit into a funding formula that has about 20 options, based on an assessment of need. BHDDH, which determines both individual need and funding, has not indicated it wants to change the current approach, except to fund employment supports as an add-on to the basic budget.

On a statewide level, the Executive Office of Human Services has devised a draft plan for independent, or “conflict-free” case management for all Rhode Islanders receiving Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) funded by the federal-state Medicaid program, including adults with developmental disabilities.

The draft plan proposes a flat rate for all HCBS case management that is yet to be disclosed. It is not clear that the plan fits the monitor’s vision of conflict-free case management, but it will have to meet the requirements of the court and the consent decree as it applies to adults with developmental disabilities.

Public Access to Hearing, EOHHS Meetings

The remote-access public hearing on the consent decree begins at 2 p.m. Dec 12 before Judge McConnell. The meeting will be hosted on zoom.gov The Meeting ID is 160 1690998, and the Password is 488765. This information is also on the court’s public access page, here, along for instructions on dialing in to the audio only. Please note that due to an apparent typographical error, the date of the hearing on the public access page is incorrect.

Maenwhile, at 3 p.m. Monday, EOHHS will host the first of three public comment meetings on the draft plan for conflict-free case management. Advance registration is required for that session and two other meetings, Dec. 14, and 15, both also at 3 p.m. Registration links and other information about conflict-free case management can be found here

Read the Dec. 6 court order here.

Read the EOHHS draft plan on conflict-free case management here.

RI DD Issues On Public Agenda Next Week

The Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island will hold a remote-access public hearing Monday, Dec. 12 on the status of a 2014 consent decree addressing the rights of adults with developmental disabilities to work and enjoy various other activities in their communities.

Separately on Monday, and on Wednesday, Dec. 14, and Thursday, Dec. 15, the state Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) will host three remote-access public sessions to gather feedback on a draft plan to comply with a rule of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services established in 2014. That rule on “conflict-free case management” requires assessments of need and coordination of healthcare and social services to be separate from the actual delivery of those services.

The hearing on the consent decree, now in its ninth year of federal oversight, will begin at 2 p.m. Monday before Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. Instructions for remote viewing or dialing in for audio are on the court’s public access page, which can be found here.

Scroll down the page to see the listing for USA vs. State of RI alongside Judge McConnell’s name, which includes the meeting ID and password.

The first of the three EOHHS public meetings on the state’s draft plan for so-called Conflict-Free Case Management will begin at 3 p.m. Dec. 12. There will be two other sessions, both at 3 p.m., on Wednesday, December 14, and Thursday, December 15.

Any proposed change in the system for coordinating federally-funded Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) will affect adults with developmental disabilities, as well as many others eligible for Medicaid-funded HCBS programs.

The way the state addresses conflict-free case management also will play a part in the state’s ultimate compliance with the consent decree. Both are drawn from the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act is intended to give people with disabilities the resources necessary for them to live regular lives in their communities.

Those interested in attending any of the EOHHS sessions must register in advance. The links for registration, as well as an explanation of the reasons for the plan and a copy of the draft document, are on the EOHHS Conflict-Free Case Management webpage here.

$2.5 M Unused For Lack of RI DD Jobs Program

CVS Trainee - File Photo

By Gina Macris

This article was updated Sept. 10.

A total of $2.5 million dedicated to helping adults with developmental disabilities find new jobs remains unused because the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities, and Hospitals (BHDDH) hasn’t yet decided on a program for spending the money..

 A department spokesman has clarified an earlier statement about the amount of money lacking a spending program.

In addition, the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) is still seeking a replacement for the chief employment administrator, who left May 1.

The lack of readily available BHDDH funding dedicated to expanding the number of job placements was disclosed by the Director of Developmental Disabilities at a virtual public forum in August.

The situation represents one factor threatening the promise of a 2014 federal court consent decree to change the lives of people who once spent their days in sheltered workshops or day centers cut off from the rest of the community.

A parallel issue at the top of the list of concerns of an independent monitor is a shortage of skilled workers who assist people with disabilities to find meaningful jobs and expand their activities in the wider community.

The workforce shortage has taken on heightened urgency since the monitor recommended last week that the U.S. District Court accelerate recruitment of workers and possibly impose multi-million dollar fines against the state for noncompliance of the consent decree. (See related article.)

Until a new DDD employment program is adopted, adults with developmental disabilities must either seek state-sponsored employment services funded outside BHDDH or reduce other types of BHDDH service hours to pay for help finding a job.

Limitations on employment supports built into the current developmental disabilities system are part of a comprehensive review now underway of reimbursement rates for private service providers and administrative barriers to integrated services,

The 2014 consent decree anticipated that by 2022 – eight years later – Rhode Island would be scaling up pilot programs of supported employment that would reach some 4,000 people.

But BHDDH has never scaled up. Its first pilot program emphasizing individualized employment supports began in 2016 and underwent several iterations until the final version, the “Person-Centered Employment Performance Program 3.0” ended June 30.

The DDD director announced in February that the program would not be renewed but did not explain the reasons.

At the same time, the director, Kevin Savage, hinted at frustration on the part of the chef administrator for employment services, Tracey Cunningham, saying that she would be “leading the charge” in designing a new supported employment program “if Tracey stays with us, and puts up with us longer.”

But Cunningham, Associate Director for Employment Services since 2016, announced her departure in early April. BHDDH has posted the position twice but has not yet found a replacement for Cunningham.

The BHDDH spokesman could not say why a new supported employment program has not yet been put in place but said the “the DD team is meeting with stakeholders to determine a spending and engagement plan.”

Job Placements Fall Short

In an August 29 report to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., the independent monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, documented the state’s limited capacity to serve adults with developmental disabilities.

For example, 23 of 31 agencies serving people with developmental disabilities said in a survey they had to turn away clients or stop taking referrals between July and December of 2021 because they did not have the staff to provide services,

By July, 2022, the state had found jobs for only 67 percent of the consumers that it had promised in the consent decree – 981 of 1,457. (The new-job totals span the entire term of the consent decree, whether or not a particular individual is currently working.)

Antosh said that job placement numbers have remained flat throughout 2021 and 2022, increasing by only 17 in a 12-month period.

In general, he described the developmental disabilities system as being in the “messy middle,” borrowing a phrase from Michael Smull, a developmental disabilities expert on system change.

Antosh said elements of the system desired in the future have been defined, and some individuals are beginning to see progress. But he said most still face the restrictions of the current system, “which needs to be funded and maintained while the future is being built.”

Funding will depend on the results of the ongoing program review that is now underway and how the recommendations will be received by the governor and the General Assembly.

Rate Review To Finish Nov. 1

Under court order, BHDDH moved forward with the comprehensive review, hiring Health Management Associates, the parent company of Burns and Associates, earlier this year. Burns and Associates helped the state a decade ago to implement the current system, which the DOJ found violated the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act. (Burns & Associates says the state did not implement its recommendations for that program.)

The DD director, Kevin Savage, said the review will be completed Nov. 1, a month earlier than expected. He told a public forum in August that he plans to schedule another public meeting shortly after the review is completed to gather feedback from the community before the BHDDH budget goes to the Governor, who must present a proposal to the General Assembly in January.

The review is expected to address not only funding issues but controversial administrative features that the monitor says are barriers to a community-based network of services, starting with the eligibility process.

For a decade, BHDDH has used the standardized Supports Intensity Scale (SIS), a lengthy interview process, to determine the intensity of a person’s disability and assign one of five funding levels for services.

Antosh has pushed back against the state’s stated intention to continue using the SIS, saying it needs yet comprehensive review. Despite the re-training of interviewers in 2016, families still report the SIS does not result in the funding necessary for needed services. And they have complained for years that they sometimes felt humiliated and emotionally drained by the SIS interviews.

The state has developed a supplemental questionnaire intended to improve the accuracy of the SIS, but Antosh said very few families report that they have seen it or understand its purpose.

The families of young people applying for adult services for the first time “continue to report being overwhelmed” by the process, which the state has promised to streamline. And families also generally don’t understand how to appeal a funding decision they believe is inadequate for the services their loved one needs, Antosh said. He recommended that intensive training of social caseworkers continue about communicating new policies to families.

Administrative Barriers To Integration

Antosh’s report also outlined the concerns of service providers about some features of the reimbursement rules, including:

• A requirement that they document the time each daytime worker spends with each client in 15-minute increments, a time-consuming and costly process.

• Another rule that dictates staffing ratios for different kinds of activities, which sometimes results in results in group activities in the community instead of individualized experiences.

Antosh reiterated recommendations of a workgroup on administrative barriers that said:

• The ratios should be replaced with reimbursement rates which allow workers to have 1,2, or 3 clients in their care

• Documentation of worker time should be done in three or four-hour units

Antosh said he expects the reviewers will reach conclusions that are similar to the workgroup. He made numerous other detailed recommendations in the 50-page report.

With the consent decree set to expire in 22 months, on June 30, 2024, Antosh said that all of his recommendations must be “fully implemented with urgency,” using boldface for emphasis.

All the state’s reforms eventually must be approved by the Court.

Read the monitor’s August 29 report here.

Read the monitor’s Sept. 1 addendum here.

RI Faces Possible Fines For DD Noncompliance

Federal Building, Providence, RI

By Gina Macris

For a second time, the state of Rhode Island is facing multi-million dollar fines for non-compliance with a 2014 consent decree which seeks to enforce the rights of adults with developmental disabilities to live regular lives in their communities

The state was in the same position about this time last year, when the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) had asked Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court to find Rhode Island in contempt of court and impose penalties of up to $1.5 million a month.

Instead, the state produced a multi-faceted “action plan” approved by the Court last October to meet the requirements of the consent decree by the time its term expires on June 30, 2024.

But now, an independent court monitor says the state has not understood the urgency of the situation and has failed to meet the expectations of the court-ordered action plan, particularly in recruiting a sufficient number of direct care workers needed to implement a community-based system of services.

McConnell has scheduled a private conference with lawyers in the case for Oct. 11.

The monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, said a filing Sept. 1 that the judge will consider levying fines retroactive to Sept. 1 unless the state can convince him, in yet another plan, that it can step up recruitment to meet compliance deadlines. That three-page report amended a much lengthier analysis Antosh delivered earlier in the week.

As each month goes by, compliance becomes more difficult.

By July 1, 2023, ten months from now, the state must pull together an adequate workforce, sufficient funding, and new individualized community-oriented services system-wide to have a shot at full compliance by June 30, 2024, Antosh said.

The new system will have to be fully operational for at least a year before the DOJ agrees to end federal oversight, according to DOJ statements in past consent decree hearings.

With less than two years remaining in the decade-long term of the agreement, the state’s capacity to fully implement consent decree requirements “continues to be limited,” Antosh said in a report to the Court Aug. 29.

Antosh said the state has “failed to realize the urgency and scope of effort needed” to address a shortage of 1081 direct care workers – roughly a third of the workforce that would be necessary to implement a community-based system of services.

Antosh’s analysis focused on remedial steps Judge McConnell ordered in the state’s 2021 action plan to push the state along in reforming the disabilities system after it had failed to meet earlier goals.

In the plan, filed last Oct. 19, the state agreed to hire an outside consultant to “coordinate and implement an intensive statewide recruitment initiative” to expand the ranks of frontline caregivers.

Six months passed without progress in selecting a recruitment consultant, Antosh said. On May 3, Judge McConnell issued a court order spelling out a numerous recruitment-related activities that were to take place over the summer and deadlines for pulling in potential new-hires.

While the state has begun in recent weeks to implement several activities, Antosh said that as of mid-August, “the Court has not received a comprehensive plan that addresses all the required components” of the recruitment and retention initiative.

In the supplementary report filed Sept. 1, Antosh said he had spoken to more than 50 people involved in workforce recruitment and found consistent criticism about

• long delays in implementation of the plan

• a lack of clarity about its intent and outcomes

• a lack of connectivity between various activities involved in the overall plan

Antosh noted that the state, in its request for proposals to hire a consultant to speed the hiring process, did not require the successful bidder to supplement the recruitment efforts of the private service agencies or families who self-direct individual service programs.

The state’s $326,500 contract with the successful bidder, Sage Squirrel Consulting, specifies that it will “develop and establish statewide mechanisms for ongoing recruitment, onboarding, training and retention of Direct Support Professionals (DSPs)” for the system serving adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Antosh, in his supplemental report Sept. 1, reiterated that the outside consultant hired by the state must become involved in recruitment and must coordinate with private service provider and families who seek workers for individually-designed service programs.

He spelled out detailed requirements of a revised recruitment plan which he expects the state to finalize by Oct. 7, four days before the lawyers in the case meet with the judge.

Provider agencies working on their own to close the gap of 1081 workers needed to implement the consent decree have made little recruitment progress on their own, Antosh concluded in his Aug. 29 report.

Between July and December, 2021, 32 agencies responding to a survey added a total of 131 people to their combined workforce. More recent figures are not yet available.

All together, the agencies still reported they had 618 vacancies, including 390 full-time positions and 228 part-time posts.

Of 350 front-line supervisors, 160 worked overtime to cover direct care shifts that otherwise would be unstaffed.

Antosh devoted attention to the staff woes of families who directed their own program of services for a loved one with developmental disabilities. Since 2017, their number has doubled, from 489 to 976. And this sector is expected to continue growing as more teenagers move into the adult service system in the future.

One factor in the growth of self-direction is that provider agencies are serving fewer numbers of people than they did before the COVID-19 pandemic. About two thirds of service providers licensed by the state reported turning away clients or declining referrals during the last half of 2021, according to Antosh’s report.

In two meetings, Antosh said, families “described their fear of imminent crisis if one or two of their primary staff depart.”

A total of 178 families responding to a survey reported having 416 support staff and 213 job openings, for a vacancy rate of almost 34 percent.

The families also had concerns about an inability to provide time for staff to participate in professional development and the lack of funding for medical or dental benefits – an important tool in recruiting and retaining workers. Without agency-level overhead, they are able to pay their workers an average of $19.94, or nearly $4 an hour more than the average starting pay at a licensed provider organization.

Judge Steps Up Pressure On RI DD Hiring

By Gina Macris

John J. McConnell, Jr.

With the state of Rhode Island six months behind in its promise to recruit and hire  critically-needed caregivers for adults with developmental disabilities, a federal judge has stepped in to jump start expansion of the work force. 

On May 3, Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. of the U.S. District Court ordered the state to prepare a recruitment strategy by Aug. 1. He also ordered specific steps the state must take to boost hiring.  

McConnell said that by Aug. 1, the state must bring on a sufficient number of recruiters, who, in turn, can attract 60 job candidates that will result in 35 new hires each month between August and next May.  

“The workforce shortage continues to be a primary barrier to substantial compliance,” McConnell said in the order. 

McConnell’s order included two other steps:

• Beginning in June, the state will be required to report every two weeks to the court’s independent monitor showing its progress in four areas in establishing and training an adequate workforce.

• By June 30, the state must conduct focus groups with provider organizations, families and individuals who run their own service programs, as well as other relevant organizations, to gather the information necessary to develop a statewide recruitment strategy.. 

McConnell’s order is his latest in a long-running effort, initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice, to get the state to comply with a consent degree in which it agreed to reinvent a developmental disabilities system organized around day care centers and sheltered workshops into one providing broad job and social opportunities for men and women. 

The workforce recruitment initiative is but one part of a comprehensive “Action Plan” the state proposed to McConnell last October to avoid a hearing on contempt charges and possible hefty fines. But now, the state is far behind in its promised hiring effort. 

The state was to have hired a consultant by last Nov. 15 to coordinate a statewide initiative to expand the number of direct care workers. 

But the state is still working on the wording of a bid proposal for the consultant’s contract, with the bid next having to go through the state purchasing system, according to a spokesman for the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH). 

Since late February, individual provider agencies have had access to money from the first phase of a $12 million Transformation Fund designed to help them and individuals and families directing their own programs to strengthen community services. Individuals and families who direct their own programs will also have access to the fund.

There was a $15 million Transformation Fund in Governor McKee’s original budget proposal for the current fiscal year, but it was never enacted.

The idea of a Tranformation Fund re-appeared in the Action Plan adopted by McConnell in October, but the providers had to wait five months to access their portions of money because funding - $12 million from the federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) - was not allocated by the General Assembly until Jan. 4. Then the actual funding had to wend its way through the state bureaucracy before it was released to the providers.

Now many of the providers are launching individual workforce recruitment initiatives as the first step in transforming services, but they have been unable to leverage any statewide coordination.  

One section of the consent decree requires the state to maintain an adequate workforce.  

But McConnell noted that earlier consultants ’ reports to the court “documented more than 1,000 direct support vacancies.” The consultants said the state had nearly 1,800 of some 2850 front-line workers needed to staff community-based, individualized activities.  

And the state has only a little more than two years to turn the situation around before the full compliance deadline of the consent decree on June 30, 2024.  

McConnell’s May 3 order speeding up the workforce initiative includes reports by the state to the court monitor in these areas:

• recruitment and retention

• training and professional development

  establishing work standards and a credentialling path for workers

• the involvement of institutions of higher learning in growing a trained workforce. 

The focus groups McConnell also ordered are to develop a recruitment strategy addressing these areas:

• The compliance needs of the state

• Possible career pathways for workers and possible pipelines for new talent

• “New concepts” for providing services

• Factors associated with job turnover and factors associated with retention

• Staff roles and responsibilities. 

Depressed wages for front-line caregivers are the primary cause of high turnover and vacancy rates. These two factors have led to a lack of sufficient services for vulnerable people who are entitled to them by law.  

In January, 2021, McConnell ordered the state to raise starting wages, then about $13.18 an hour, to $20 an hour by 2024.

Governor Dan McKee’s initial budget proposal for the current fiscal year, released in  March, 2021, contained no wage increase. But as a result of court-ordered negotiations between the state and private service providers, base pay jumped from $13.18 to $15.75 last July 1.  

This year, McKee has proposed raising direct care wages to $18.00 an hour, but recent inflationary pressures on the job market has prompted Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, and Rep. Evan Shanley, D-Warwick, to propose companion bills that would hike that  hourly rate to $21 on July 1.

While the workforce shortage has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been building for more than a decade, ever since the General Assembly enacted the fee-for-service reimbursement system known as “Project Sustainability” in 2011 in conjunction with rate cuts of about 18 percent overall to private service providers.

Project Sustainability resulted in layoffs, double-digit pay cuts, and a growing exodus of workers. Jobs which once paid a living wage and had opportunities for advancement were turned into subsistence work.  

In 2014, the federal Department of Justice  found that Project Sustainability’s over-reliance on sheltered workshops and day care centers violated the rights of individuals to choose individualized services in their communities. Sheltered workshops were eliminated in 2018. 

Even after the state agreed to correct these civil rights violations, it did not follow through with the necessary funding.

From 2011 through 2018, funding for developmental disabilities never caught up with the cost-of-living, according to an analysis prepared by the Senate Fiscal Office for Sen. DiPalma in 2018 He is first vice-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.  

McConnell took the bench in January, 2016 to oversee the case at the request of the DOJ and an independent court monitor, who in 2015 had found implementation lagging after an initial flush of success with former sheltered workshop employees who quickly found competitive employment.  

Beginning in 2016, the main fiscal strategy of the state was a multi-year effort to shift funding to daytime services from residential care by moving people from costly group homes to less-costly shared living arrangements in private homes.   

While shared living has grown slowly, it has not resulted in the significant savings that state officials originally envisioned.   

In response to pressure from the court in 2016, the Division of Developmental Disabilities hired professional staff to work on supported employment and community inclusion initiatives, but core requirements of Project Sustainability remain in place.  

They include staffing requirements geared to center-based care that are impractical in the community.  

In August, 2021, with the state falling farther behind in the number of job placements required by the consent decree, the DOJ asked McConnell to find the state in contempt of court and levy hefty fines.  

The state responded with the Action Plan, which McConnell turned into a court order.  

A key portion of the Action Plan is a rate review that is being conducted by Health Management Associates, a healthcare consultant which bought the firm responsible for creating Project Sustainability in 2011 There hasn’t been a rate review since then.  

In 2018, the lead consultant on Project Sustainability testified publicly that a rate review of developmental disability services was already overdue.  

Mark Podrazik, a co-founder of the former Burns & Associates, told a legislative commission that his firm recommends rate reviews every five years at a minimum. (Proposed legislation separate from the ongoing rate review would require Rhode Island to update reimbursement rates to developmental disability service providers every two years.)  

Podrazik, who now works for Health Management Associates on hospital projects, also said that the state undercut Burns & Associates rate recommendations in creating Project Sustainability in 2011. 

The current rate review is to be completed by Dec. 1, 2022, giving the state just 18 months to enact changes and get the federal government to sign off on its oversight role before the 2024 compliance deadline.  

To read Judge McConnell’s order, click here.

Judge Will Settle Argument Over Witnesses In Consent Decree Case

By Gina Macris

Sometime in September, the state of Rhode Island drafted a settlement agreement, aimed at avoiding upcoming federal court contempt proceedings, for continuing violations of a 2014 civil rights consent decree case affecting adults with developmental disabilities.

But as the state’s lawyers were planning to show the proposal to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), pre-trial legal sparring moved front and center, and the chances for any settlement to resolve the contempt charges remain unknown.

In an email chain made public in a court filing, the state’s lead lawyer told a counterpart at the DOJ on Sept. 30 that his team hoped to confer with DOJ lawyers in the following days about the proposed settlement.

Those emails also showed the two sides sparred over pre-trial procedures, coming to an impasse over the deposition of witnesses in the contempt hearing, scheduled to begin Oct. 18. A longstanding lack of funding and staff to carry out compliance with a 2014 consent decree would be a be a key issue in the contempt hearing.

The DOJ asked Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court to intervene, and compel the state to make available a total of 15 witnesses, including the House and Senate fiscal advisors, in time for the DOJ to depose all of them in accordance with a pretrial deadline already established in a court order.

McConnell has scheduled a teleconference with the lawyers for 4 pm on October 7.

In asking McConnell to intervene, the DOJ included a Sept. 30 chain of emails between DOJ lawyer Victoria Thomas and two state lawyers, Marc DeSisto and Kathleen Hilton.

In the emails, DeSisto and Hilton pushed back the start of depositions, in the process postponing a deposition that had already been scheduled with the state’s chief auditor in the Office of Management and Budget.

In addition, DeSisto and Hilton said they could not make the House and Senate Fiscal Advisors available for deposition at all. Sharon Ferland holds the House post and Stephen Whitney advises the Senate.

Hilton wrote: “Without more information as to the reasons you are seeking to call Sharon and Stephen as witnesses, we cannot make a determination on whether we could agree to make them available. There very well may be privileges that need to be preserved by way of a motion for protective order. Additionally, we do not have the authority to accept a subpoena on their behalf.”

DOJ’s Thomas replied: “We are seeking the testimony of Sharon and Stephen based on the Court Monitor’s opinion that they have valuable information relevant to the funding provision of the Consent Decree. We have now exhausted our good faith efforts to resolve this dispute and will be filing a motion to compel shortly.”

Earlier in the email chain, DeSisto had mentioned the proposed settlement:

“As we discussed in last evening's phone call,” he wrote to Thomas, “it is my hope that in the next few days we can confer regarding the terms of settlement. We are waiting for some feedback from Tony (A. Anthony Antosh, the independent court monitor) in this regard. Once we receive his input, we would like to have a settlement conference with you, maybe as early as tomorrow.”

Thomas replied:

“We are eager to see the State's written settlement proposal and to conference with you tomorrow. That said, while we remain hopeful that a settlement may potentially resolve our contempt motion, we must preserve our litigation rights.” Thomas continued to press for assurances on the depositions.

In its contempt motion, The DOJ has stated that, if necessary, it is prepared to present evidence that the state “failed even to ask its Legislature for a sufficient appropriation” and that it “failed to make efficient use even of the resources it had – for example, by failing to modify State rules and incentives that favor providers of less integrated services over providers of more integrated services.”

The DOJ has proposed an escalating scale of fines, from $500,000 on the first day of each of the first two months to $50,000 a day beginning on the 70th day. At that rate, the fines would add up to about $1.5 million a month.

RI Faces Contempt Hearing Over Non-Compliance With Olmstead Consent Decree

By Gina Macris

Judge McConnell

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court has begun formal contempt proceedings against the state of Rhode Island in connection with its failure to comply with a 2014 civil rights consent decree affecting adults with developmental disabilities.

In an order issued July 12, McConnell scheduled a five-day “show cause” hearing for Oct. 18 to 22, allowing the state to defend itself against a contempt finding.

McConnell noted that the state has just three years to reach full compliance by the consent decree deadline in 2024. (The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has indicated in the past that it will not sign off on compliance until all the required changes have been in place for at least a year.)

With the 2024 deadline fast approaching, the state’s failure to make more progress on two broad issues, despite three orders from the judge in the last six months, has set the stage for the upcoming hearing.

In general, the state has not addressed a chronic shortage of workers in the existing system of services, nor has it shown how it plans to overhaul that system, as required by the consent decree, to support adults with developmental disabilities in their communities.

The General Assembly recently set aside $39.7 million to raise the wages of front-line caregivers in the private sector, whose work the state relies on to bring it in line with consent decree requirements.

But the pay increases alone may be too little and too late to put a dent in the shortage of workers needed to provide broad-scale supports in the community for adults with developmental disabilities.

Nor has the state fulfilled another key promise to overhaul a fee-for-service reimbursement system for private service providers that also hobbles providers’ ability to provide support for individualized work and community activities because of a bureaucracy originally designed for segregated care.

In the consent decree, signed by then-governor Lincoln Chafee, the state promised to correct an over-reliance on segregated settings, which the DOJ found violated the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act, as it was underscored by the Olmstead decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1999.

More than seven years after the consent decree was signed, the state must still “transform the system for providing services and supports and must achieve and maintain sufficient capacity for supported employment and integrated day services,” McConnell said, summing up the latest report from an independent court monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, which was submitted to him May 31.
McConnell highlighted key points from Antosh’s report:

• Integrated employment goals had been met for only 52 percent of former employees in sheltered workshops and for 79.4 percent of those originally segregated in day care centers. (Sheltered workshops were eliminated in 2018.)

• Only 55 percent of all adults covered by the consent decree were participating in community-based, non-work activities, and for an average of slightly less than 10 hours a week, below the standards set by the consent decree.

• These deficiencies were caused by a shortage of more than 1000 direct care workers. A consultants’ study done last fall showed that the state needed 2845 direct care workers to comply with the consent decree but only had 1764 in the workforce, leaving a gap of 1081.

In addition, the court monitor concluded that the state has not fully complied with three court orders McConnell has issued since Jan. 6 to get the state to pick up the pace of reform measures.

These orders gave the state until June 30 to develop a three-year budget strategy for compliance, which was not forthcoming. The judge’s orders included two measures to address the worker shortage:

• Immediate increases to reimbursement rates that enable private service providers and families directing their own programs to pay wages competitive with those offered by Massachusetts, Connecticut, and a parallel group home system run directly by the state of Rhode Island. (The recent rate increases are expected to add more than $2 to the hourly pay of front-line workers but are still less than wages of the neighboring states and the state-run group home system.)

• A roadmap for raising wages to $20 an hour by 2024.

McConnell also required the three-year compliance plan to include:

• A structural overhaul of the reimbursement system to promote integration, as well as funding to support it.

• Changes to allow adults with developmental disabilities and their families more control and flexibility in planning purposeful programs of service aligned with individual budgets.

• Increased funding for transportation.

• Per-capita funding for acquiring technology to help individuals with developmental disabilities.

In one of the orders issued earlier this year, McConnell said the state could submit an alternative three-year strategy which did not follow his own outline but still would result in compliance with the consent decree. The state submitted nothing.

Leading up to the contempt hearing in October, McConnell laid out a schedule for an exchange of information that involves Antosh, the court monitor; the DOJ, and lawyers for the state.

The first two deadlines affect the monitor, who must submit a list of witnesses by July 16 and a written preview of their testimony by July 30.

After that, the state and the DOJ will have a week – until August 6 – to comment on the monitor’s reports and the monitor will have another week – until Aug. 13 – to finalize his reports. Additional deadlines on the schedule pertain to depositions, witness lists, and disclosure of witness statements and expert reports to be submitted by the DOJ and the state’s lawyers, Marc DeSisto and Kathleen Hilton. To read McConnell’s order, click here.

RI To Give Olmstead Update to Judge Tomorrow

By Gina Macris

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court will get an update Tuesday, April 27, at 1 pm. in a virtual public hearing on Rhode Island’s plan to comply with a 2014 consent decree requiring services that enable adults with developmental disabilities live regular lives in their communities.

McConnell has ordered the state to have a three-year budget plan in place by June 30, with progress reports at the end of April, May, and June.

Without such a plan, Rhode Island cannot meet a 2024 deadline to comply with the consent decree, McConnell has said.

For the court’s instructions on accessing the hearing remotely, click here.

The Zoom Meeting ID is 160 086 6769

The Zoom Password is 515082

RI General Assembly Will Handle Court-Related DD Issues DD Issues In Regular Budget Talks

By Gina Macris

The pace of discussions for complying with a court-ordered overhaul of Rhode Island’s developmental disability system is expected to pick up as early as next week, when newly elevated Governor Daniel McKee rolls out his budget proposal for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

McKee was sworn in March 2, replacing Gina Raimondo, who resigned as governor after clearing final hurdles in Washington, DC to become Secretary of Commerce. Raimondo’s office said in mid-January that McKee, then Lt. Governor, would be responsible for submitting the budget proposal to the General Assembly.

It remains unclear to what degree, if at all, the proposed state budget will incorporate additional money for initial steps toward compliance with a federal court order enforcing a 2014 civil rights agreement.

While uncertainty about funding hovers, court-ordered discussions organized by the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) have been underway since last August to develop a path forward for providing services that will encourage integration of adults with developmental disabilities in their communities, in accordance with the 2014 consent decree and the Americans With Disabilities Act.

A recent report to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U. S. District Court indicates short-term recommendations are taking shape to address some of the 16 points the judge laid out in a reform agenda last summer.

He gave the state until June 30 to develop a three-year implementation plan that will achieve full compliance with the consent decree by 2024.

Representatives of the House and Senate leadership participated in some court-ordered reform talks until McConnell issued an order Jan. 6 which said the three-year plan must include these specifics:

• a $20 minimum wage for direct care workers by fiscal 2024.

• Incorporation of the developmental disabilities caseload in the formal process for estimating the state’s public assistance obligations for budget calculations, beginning this year.

On March 3, House Speaker Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Dominick Ruggerio issued a new statement on how they will handle legislative issues raised by the reform efforts:

“Specific issues will be analyzed and discussed in legislative committees as part of the public hearing process on pending legislation as well as the upcoming state budget.”

The two leaders continued: “The members of the General Assembly care deeply about individuals with developmental disabilities and ensuring a strong continuum of care, and the Senate President and House Speaker believe that we have an obligation as a society to provide strong services and supports for all vulnerable Rhode Islanders.”

The leadership had withdrawn from reform talks out of concern that their representatives’ participation could be perceived as tacit approval of change outside the legislative process, according to separate letters sent to McConnell Feb. 3.

Shekarchi’s and Ruggerio’s statement did not specifically mention the direct care worker wages or making the developmental disabilities numbers part of the twice-yearly Caseload Estimating Conference, the budgeting tool used by the governor and the legislature.

Development of a new approach for determining how to support the individualized plans of the developmentally disabled population is at the heart of the overhaul. The existing fee-for-service system was designed 10 years ago for congregate care, where one or two staff members could oversee as many as ten clients in a day care center or sheltered workshop. The U.S. Department of Justice found that model violated the ADA’s Integration Mandate.

In November, McConnell heard testimony that the current funding ceiling for the private provider system, roughly $268.7 million in federal/state Medicaid money, will not support integrated services, which are much more labor-intensive — and thus, more costly — than congregate care. The cost of correcting the non-compliance could increase the developmental disabilities budget by nearly 50 percent, according to one estimate.

Because of the uncertainty over funding, five workgroups organized by BHDDH are focusing on short-term changes that can ease administrative burdens on providers and make the state bureaucracy more user-friendly for the individuals served and their families, according to a progress report submitted to McConnell at the end of February.

According to the report, BHDDH expects to have detailed information by March 31 on:

• shifting from quarterly to annual per-person budget authorizations

• streamlining dozens of private provider billing codes, many of which require documentation of staff time in 15-minute increments for each client served

• simplifying the process of writing each client’s annual service plan “to reduce repeated questions, frustrations, and errors requiring correction and intervention.”

The report recommends adding a second assessment or new questions or criteria to improve the accuracy of the standardized Supports Intensity Scale-A, (SIS-A) interview, used to determine service needs and funding levels.

Improved assessments would reduce reliance on appeals. Interviewers also need training on cultural differences, it said.

Additional recommendations include:

• a training program for parents on how to approach the SIS-A, which has been the subject of frequent complaints over the years from parents

• clarification of the process for appealing funding determinations made as a result of the SIS-A, and developing ways to more quickly resolve appeals

• consolidation of separate applications for Medicaid and for Medicaid-funded services into one process

• a request for a waiver from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for Medicaid eligibility redeterminations for persons with developmental disabilities, who have life-long conditions.

The report said long-term revision of the fiscal and reimbursement system will be implemented by December, 2022.

The workgroups developing the recommendations include both state officials and representatives of the community, including individuals who themselves receive services, families, advocates, and service providers.

The groups’ recommendations are reviewed by the appropriate department-level directors and other key officials, according to the report.

Once final recommendations are analyzed and decisions made by the state, a “cohesive workplan” that will be submitted to McConnell on or before June 30 as required by an order the judge issued last July 30, the report said.

RI House And Senate Withdraw From Budget-Related Consent Decree Talks

By Gina Macris

Both the Rhode Island House and Senate have withdrawn from negotiations on a three-year budget plan to overhaul the state’s developmental disabilities system and comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

The development of such a plan had been recommended by an independent federal court monitor as part of a fiscal analysis he submitted in November to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr of the U.S. District Court. McConnell oversees the state’s efforts to get into compliance with a 2014 consent decree in which the state agreed to correct violations of the ADA by 2024.

Members of the House and Senate joined the talks in December, but the leadership of both chambers of the General Assembly decided to withdraw after McConnell made the development of the three-year budget plan the topic of a court order Jan. 6.

Dominic Ruggerio

“We are concerned that continued involvement of the Senate could be perceived as tacit approval of the entire body without the proper processes that allows for meaningful member input,” Senate President Dominic Ruggerio and Majority Leader Michael McCaffrey said in a Feb. 3 letter to McConnell.

The House used similar language in a separate letter.

Ruggerio and McCaffrey wrote, “We appreciate the work of the Court and the process by which you are moving to identify and operationalize solutions to accomplish the goals of the consent decree.”

“We anticipate that the Court will order the state to undertake a course of action, and at that time, in our role as the appropriating body, we will further engage in this process,” the Senate leadership told Judge McConnell.

Last July, McConnell ordered an overhaul of the entire developmental disabilities service system to end segregated care and encourage the integration of individuals with intellectual challenges in their communities.

In response to that July order, representatives of the state’s developmental disability agency began working with families, providers, and advocates on a 16-point agenda for reforming the way services are delivered and the rules for reimbursing the private agencies which provide direct care.

McConnell’s order on Jan. 6 focused on the budgetary implications, memorializing the main points of the monitor’s analysis, including a requirement that the state raise the wages of direct care workers to $20 an hour by Fiscal 2024.

In the same order, McConnell also said the actual costs of developmental disabilities services must be included in a state budgeting procedure known as the Caseload Estimating Conference, which allows the state to get a better handle on its financial obligations for entitlement programs.

Joseph Shekarchi

In a statement responding to a request for specifics prompting the withdrawal, Shekarchi, newly elected Speaker of the House, said, “It would be best to answer these questions with an overall clarification that the action by the House is not a repudiation of any of the specific ideas being discussed.“

When the House was invited to join talks in December, the leadership expected that its representatives would participate in discussions about issues of concern for service providers and options for what might be included in the Governor’s upcoming budget. House leadership “was happy to have someone included,” Shekarchi said.

Because the Jan. 6 order contained “much more prescriptive policy remedies than expected, the House felt that further participation might be perceived as delegation of its legislative authority,” the statement said.

It was out of an abundance of caution that the House withdrew, he said.

The Senate leadership’s letter said it was “unclear if the Senate’s inclusion was designed to guide discussions and outcomes or merely for observation.”

Ruggerio and McCaffrey said “the Senate values continued dialogue and looks forward to reviewing any proffered solutions in an open, public committee process.”

Similarly, the letter from the House leadership said they encourage continued dialogue and “are eager to have one or more of our committees review potential solutions in an open and public process.”

Individual Senators may continue to participate in the current talks, but are acting on their own behalf and do not represent the Senate as a body, Ruggerio and McCaffrey said.

Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, has attended the negotiations and is widely known as an advocate for the integration of adults with developmental disabilities.

McConnell, meanwhile, has scheduled a private conference Feb. 11 with the monitor, Antosh, and lawyers representing the U.S. Department of Justice, the state, and several service providers.

Federal Judge Orders RI DD System Overhaul, $7 Worker Pay Hikes By 2024

By Gina Macris

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court has tightened his reins on Rhode Island’s developmental disability system in an order that gives the state two and a half years to raise the hourly wages of direct care workers nearly $7, to $20 an hour, as part of a sweeping overhaul to comply with the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

Through its budget, the state controls the parameters of wages for front-line caregivers, who make an average of $13.18 an hour working for some three dozen private agencies under license from the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH).

McConnell’s order, issued Jan. 6, distills recent recommendations of an independent court monitor, who said that Rhode Island cannot fully comply with a 2014 civil rights decree unless it overhauls its entire developmental disabilities system and increases funding. The civil rights consent decree says federal oversight is to expire June 30, 2024, but only if corrections of civil rights violations have been in place for at least a year.

Low front-line worker pay is widely regarded as the biggest weakness of the state’s developmental disability system. Provider agencies, as well as those independently coordinating their own services or the services of loved ones, have found it increasingly difficult to recruit and retain staff, who often can make more in fast food restaurants and retail stores, or at an Amazon distribution center. The staffing situation has only been exacerbated by the COVId-19 pandemic in the last year.

With the 2024 deadline in mind, McConnell’s order gives the state about six months to develop a three-year budget plan that will subsequently reach the $20 hourly worker rate. That pay increase would be effective in the 2024 fiscal year, which begins July 1, 2023.

The budget plan also must provide:

• Proportional wage increases for other categories of support staff, like job developers and supervisors

• Increased funding to address the costs of moving from a segregated system of care to one that integrates adults with developmental disabilities in their communities for work and leisure time.

• A per-capita amount for technology. Mobile phones and other hardware would provide internet connectivity still inaccessible to many adults with developmental disabilities as well as provide other kinds of assistance, depending on individual needs.

• Increased funding for transportation, found to be a barrier for many in getting to work or attending community events.

• Increased funding for the individualized planning that is supposed to drive purposeful services designed to help people lead meaningful lives.

Other than the direct care wages, McConnell’s order specified no dollar amounts for the three-year fiscal plan, which he said must be completed before the next fiscal year’s budget is finalized. (Plans aside, the General Assembly can only authorize funding one year at a time.)

The judge said the amounts must be negotiated between state officials and representatives of the community, including “individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, families, organizations that provide services and supports, and other stakeholders.”

And beginning this year, McConnell said, the legislative and executive branches must take into account the developmental disabilities caseload in calculating its public assistance obligations in the semi-annual Caseload Estimating Conference, which occurs in May and November in conjunction with the Revenue Estimating Conference. The costs of the developmental disabilities services historically have been omitted from caseload estimating conferences, which are used by the executive and legislative branches in annual budget planning.

In addition, the judge’s order said the state has until June to complete the revision of “all aspects of the developmental disabilities and funding system,” a reference to basic assumptions and regulations that for the last decade have been designed to promote group or congregate care. That effort has been underway since last July. Its parameters are already subject to a separate court order.

Since 2016, state officials have strived to provide pilot programs to support regular employment and increase community activities for adults with developmental disabilities, but it has become increasingly clear that the existing level of funding and the associated reimbursement rules for private service providers will not support system-wide change.

A full discussion of the issues reflected in the judge’s order are contained in a recent fiscal analysis submitted to the court by the court monitor.

RI Faces High Cost For Fixing DD ADA Violations

By Gina Macris

After funding services for adults with developmental disabilities below their actual costs for nearly a decade, the state of Rhode Island is about to experience sticker shock.

The system of private agencies that provides most services for adults with developmental disabilities is on the verge of collapse, by all accounts, and a federal judge has given the state until Dec. 18 – five days from now – to come up with the money to keep it afloat until the next fiscal year.

The state also is under court order to devise and execute a plan for strengthening the system during the next three years so it can comply with a federal civil rights agreement that requires Rhode Island to integrate adults with developmental disabilities into community life by 2024. With the judge ready to use his power to enforce the consent decree, those costs could increase spending on developmental disability services by a third or more in the next several years.

Last month, a federal court monitor addressed the short-term fiscal gap by suggesting that the state release $2 million a month in unspent funds already allocated to developmental disabilities simply to keep the agencies’ doors open over the next six months. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced agencies to shrink services and drastically reduce billing.

Judge John J. McConnell, Jr.

In a recent hearing before Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court, a spokeswoman for service providers took a different approach, saying the state needs to immediately raise direct care pay, now an average of $13.08 an hour, to enable the private agencies to recruit and retain employees during the pandemic.

Roughly two thirds of these essential workers are women and more than half are people of color, according to the trade association spokeswoman.

A recently-completed report from the association, the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI), fleshes out projected costs:

• An hourly increase of $2.32, to $15.50, would require nearly $44.1 million a year, or 16.4 percent more than the state has currently budgeted.

• A hike to $17.50 would mean an additional $79.8 million, or a 29.7 percent increase in the annual budget

• A $20 hourly rate would add $124.5 million to the budget. That would amount to a 46.4 percent increase in spending.

The report, “A System in Crisis,” said employers need to be able to offer $17.50 immediately to get job applicants in the door during the pandemic. In Fiscal 2022, which begins July 1, the rate should be increased again to $20 an hour.

Monitor’s Calculations More Limited In Scope

The monitor, meanwhile, agrees with the need for pay hikes, although he would allow the state more leeway on the timeline. In his latest report, filed with Judge McConnell Nov. 30, the monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, said the state should raise hourly wages to $17.50 “as quickly as possible” and to $20 by Fiscal 2024, which begins July 1, 2023.

A. Anthony Antosh

Antosh’s fiscal analysis focuses primarily on the changes needed in the final three years of the consent decree. He said there is consensus among various stakeholders with whom he has consulted that staffing and fiscal issues are the two main concerns in implementing the 2014 civil rights agreement.

“The state budget deficit resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic significantly complicates any fiscal analysis and any decision-making about budget planning,” he said.

Antosh makes no specific dollar recommendations but says that figures should be negotiated with provider agencies in a three-year budget plan to be completed in time to begin in the next fiscal cycle on July 1, 2021. He emphasized that the agencies provide 83 percent of the services necessary to support those protected by the consent decree.

Antosh said an ongoing review of the entire fiscal and reimbursement system, itemized in a 16-point court order issued by McConnell July 30, should be complete by June 30, 2021.

He also recommended that steps be taken now to make sure that the specific costs of a strengthened developmental disability system are acknowledged when future state budgets are being developed.

For example, the data on caseloads provided monthly by the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) to the General Assembly should be included in the Caseload Estimating Conference used to determine human service needs in the overall state budget. That is also one of the final recommendations of the “Project Sustainability Commission,” a a special legislative commission headed by Staite Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown.

While not acknowledging the actual costs, which pay for entitlement services under provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act, the General Assembly has often criticized the state’s developmental disabilities system for running over budget.

The governor typically relies on the November caseload and revenue estimating conferences to draw up the budget that is submitted to the General Assembly in January. The legislature, in turn, relies on more finely tuned caseload and revenue estimates in May to finalize a spending plan for the next fiscal year.

Monitor’s Numbers “Illustrate” Solutions

Antosh’s report includes five sets of fiscal projections that can best be described as starting points for discussion rather than cost estimates for system-wide change. For reasons related to the language of the consent decree, the monitor’s numbers cover individuals who were identified in confidential documents between 2013 and 2016 and today make up about 67 percent of the entire population with developmental disabilities.

Antosh said the tables of projections and descriptions of the associated costs “illustrate” various options in reconfiguring daytime services for the 67 percent.

The most comprehensive “illustration “ of the cost of re-inventing daytime employment and leisure activities for the specific portion of the population protected by the consent decree would add $35.6 million to the budget in Fiscal Year 2022, which begins next July 1, Antosh said. An additional $14.9 million would be needed in Fiscal 2023 and $15.8 million extra would be added in Fiscal Year 2024.

In addition to protecting a particular class of people, the consent decree is supposed to lead to a system-wide transformation. And state officials have made clear that they intend to include all people eligible for developmental disability services in a reformed system, not just those identified at the time of the consent decree.

The three increases projected by Antosh add up to about $66.3 million a year in three years’ time. Antosh said the increases need not all come from Medicaid funding but draw on a variety of other public and private sources.

The current annual approved budget for the private service providers is about $268.7 million in federal-state Medicaid funds, although the providers’ ability to bill for reimbursement has shrunk since the start of the pandemic.

Actual spending on privately-run services was about $240.8 million in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2019, according to state budget figures. Antosh said the increases need not all come from Medicaid funding but draw on a variety of other public and private sources.

CPNRI, meanwhile, offered estimates for system-wide reform that would not only increase wages but provide for more labor-intensive supports in the community in keeping with the requirements of the consent decree. The organization’s report said that at a direct care rate of $17.50 an hour, the more labor-intensive option would cost between $112.9 and $158.9 million, depending on the number of hours provided and other variables, including the level of independence of each individual as perceived by the state’s assessment tool.

CPNRI’s report incorporated work completed earlier this year by BHDDH consultants, as well as earlier projections done for the state by different consultants.

COVID-19 Exacerbates Inequities

The pandemic has highlighted the inadequacy of the poverty-level pay of direct care workers in the private sector. The average wage of $13.18 an hour falls below many entry-level jobs in retail, delivery, warehouse, restaurant and janitorial fields, according to the recent report from CPNRI.

That rate is also nearly $5 less than the $18 minimum hourly rate the state pays its own employees to do the same work, running a small parallel system of group homes for about 125 adults with developmental disabilities.

The years-long difficulties faced by providers in recruiting staff have reached critical proportions during the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving many individuals without services and crippling the agencies’ ability to generate income.

The crisis has been nine years in the making.

In 2011, the General Assembly devalued the private provider system when it adopted a new reimbursement model and budget cuts that were justified with an executive branch memo that simply said providers could deliver the same services with less money.

The $26- million budget cut resulted in layoffs and slashed wages. Entry-level positions for caregivers, once the starting point of a career ladder for caregivers who did not necessarily have college degrees, became minimum-wage, dead-end jobs.

At the time, the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities (BHDDH) ignored the recommendation of an outside consultant who said direct care workers should receive a minimum of $15 an hour within a year’s time.

The state pleaded poverty in the aftermath of the financial crash of 2008 and 2009, but by 2011, most other states were either holding steady on previous cuts or beginning to reverse reductions in human service spending, including those for people with developmental disabilities.

The austerity move accompanied a new reimbursement system billed as “Project Sustainability,” intended to equitably distribute available funds to eligible adults with developmental disabilities. The reimbursement model incentivized congregate care in sheltered workshops and day care centers – the least costly form of supervision. Subsequently, the DOJ found that an over-reliance on congregate care violated the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act. That finding led to the consent decree.

In a recent report, CPNRI said that COVID -19 has thrust a system developed and funded for congregate care into one that must deliver personalized services to mitigate infection among a vulnerable population.

Long-term effects of neglect on the system prevent providers from being “agile and responsive to meet the demand and needs of the community,” said the report. For example, the reimbursement model assumes that 40 percent of services will be delivered in center-based care, which is prohibited by public health concerns.

Read the court monitor’s report here.

Read the CPNRI report, “System in Crisis” here.

Federal Judge Asks RI For Quick Action To Increase DD Funding And Avoid Court Order

John J. McConnell , Jr.

By Gina Macris

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has made it clear he is prepared to use the power of the U.S. District Court, if necessary, to ensure the state of Rhode Island provides adequate funding for adults with development disabilities.

That population of about 4000 people is protected by a 2014 civil rights agreement set to expire in 2024, assuming the Court approves.

Time is already drawing short for the state to make the changes necessary to achieve compliance by the 2024 deadline. The process would require approval by the General Assembly and would have to be running smoothly for a year before the state is released from federal oversight.

But the COVID-19 pandemic has added urgency to the situation, because the state’s compliance depends on some three dozen private service providers that are in such shaky ground financially that they won’t survive the next six months without extra cash.

That was the picture presented to McConnell at a hastily-called virtual court hearing on Zoom Nov. 24.

McConnell gave state officials and advocates until Dec. 18 to figure out a solution to providers’ short-range fiscal problems.

McConnell said he saw “two levels of crisis:”

• an immediate one that threatens the viability of social services for adults with developmental disabilities over the next six months, with conditions changing “second by second, moment by moment, and day by day.”

• a system-wide crisis around the state’s ability to meet the requirements of the 2014 consent decree.

Since last summer, the state has been engaged in a court-ordered planning effort to devise solutions to the systemic issues and present McConnell with a long-range implementation plan by June, 2021.

But the judge said he called Tuesday’s hearing in response to a preliminary fiscal report from an independent monitor, who said the burdens of coping with the coronavirus pandemic posed more immediate threats to service providers.

Cooperative Solution Preferred

McConnell asked the monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, to convene a “collaborative” public-private group to come up with an immediate funding solution by December 18. The collaboration should include state officials, lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice, and representatives of the community, including the head of a provider trade association, Tina Spears, McConnell said.

Lawyers for the state, including Kathleen Hilton and Marc DeSisto, framed it as a continuation of an active collaboration that already has resulted in one hazard pay initiative.

McConnell said he much preferred a solution devised by the state and its partners in the community, rather than having to resort to a court order.

But he made it clear that one way or another, he considers it his responsibility, as a judge in the “third and co-equal branch of government,” to protect the population with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Rhode Island.

“The advisable way is for the good and smart people to sign off and figure out how to do it,” the judge said.

After hearing from budget director Jonathan Womer, health and human services secretary Womazetta Jones, and other state officials, McConnell said “there is no doubt we have an awesome team in the executive branch whose hearts and minds and souls are in the right place.”

McConnell acknowledged that “quite a bit of money” ($20 million) has been allocated to developmental disabilities during the pandemic, but he said “it has become inadequate as the system currently exists.”

The state “may have fiscal handcuffs on,” as Womer, the budget director, explained, but “for the Court, it’s of no import where the money comes from.”

The state and “all its entities” are part of a consent decree that enforces the civil rights of adults with developmental disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act, McConnell said.

“But make no mistake,” he said. If necessary, “the Court will use all its powers to order the state and all its entities to come up with the money,” he said.

Effects Of Pandemic “Unrelenting”

The trade association representative, Tina Spears, director of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, (CPNRI) illustrated the current problem in human terms.

In the first three weeks of November, a single provider agency experienced COVID- 19 infections in four of its 18 group homes. Sixteen staff members and eight group home residents tested positive, with four residents requiring hospitalization. Three staffers had to quarantine at home, and one staff member died, Spears said.

Meanwhile, the agency’s day programming, which included expansive work-related supports and other services, is running at 30 percent capacity, she said, running into debt at an exponential rate.

“The situation on the ground is unrelenting,” she said.

Kayleigh Fischer, Director of Budget and Finance for EOHHS, laid out the various federal initiatives, totaling $20 million, that have helped service providers stay afloat during 2020.

And Womer, the budget director, explained the fiscal challenges posed by COVID-19, which has decimated revenue and has saddled the state with a projected budget deficit of $250 million to $275 million by the end of the fiscal year in June, depending on who’s counting.

“It’s confusing. There are a lot of moving pieces and a lot of federal guidance that’s constantly changing,” he said.

“We have more restrictions on spending now because of the pandemic,” Womer said. “We are reducing spending anywhere we can to contain the deficit,” he said.

The state can spend federal grant money like the $1.6 billion allocated to Rhode Island for coronavirus relief, Womer said, but among the exclusions are spending for workforce bonuses, as well as replacing state revenue in the federal-state match for the Medicaid program.

Medicaid is the program that funds the developmental disability service workforce.

Spears Highlights Below-Market Funding

Spears acknowledged that without the emergency funding the state has allocated so far, the developmental disability service system already would have folded.

She said she appreciates the fiscal challenges Womer described, but “this has been the rationale for underfunding our workforce for the last decade.“

In 2011, the state deliberately set reimbursement rates for private providers of developmental disability services below market costs, Spears said. “This fact cannot be overstated,” she said.

The rate-cutting, which resulted in layoffs and sharp wage reductions, has been documented in an exhaustive $1.1 million study commissioned by the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, (BHDDH), and by a separate special legislative commission.

Over time, Spears said, the flawed fiscal foundation of the reimbursement model has made it increasingly difficult for providers to recruit and retain qualified workers, a situation that has only been exacerbated by the pandemic.

Today’s average pay for direct care workers is $13.18 an hour, but provider agencies say they must pay $25 to $30 an hour to get workers to go into COVID-positive group homes or homes where residents are in quarantine, according to Antosh, the court monitor.

Antosh has proposed the state deploy $2 million a month from unused developmental disability funding to boost the pay of direct care workers to $20 an hour and cover other expenses related to COVID-19.

Separate from Antosh’s proposal, Spears said, CPNRI has asked Governor Gina Raimondo for COVID Cares Act relief funding for incentive pay for workers in coronavirus-positive group homes and for emergency relocation funds. These funds would be used for temporary quarters to make sure that COVID-negative group home residents can be separated from housemates who are infected.

She did not provide additional detail on that pandemic-related funding request.

Instead she focused her remarks during the hearing on separate recommendations for addressing the structural problems in the fee-for-service reimbursement model.

The state should raise entry-level wages to $17.50 an hour immediately, with a boost to $20 an hour in the fiscal year beginning next July 1, she said. Spears said the state has received an increase in the federal share of the federal-state Medicaid program which has not been passed along to service providers.

In addition, there should be an expedited, yet comprehensive, review of the rate structure that includes the cost of implementing policies mandated by the 2014 consent decree, Spears said. The current rate structure does not support the agreement, she said. She said changes in the rate structure should be ready to be incorporated in the budget that begins next July 1.

The DOJ has found that the overhaul of the developmental disability service system adopted in 2011 incentivized segregated care, in violation of the Integration mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

During the court hearing, Womazetta Jones, the Health and Human Services Secretary, said she wants to work with service providers to do what is feasible and equitable, given all the needs of vulnerable populations.

McConnell replied to Jones:

“As a citizen, I have long admired your service,” he said.

But he pointed out that Rhode Islanders with developmental disabilities have a protection that other vulnerable populations do not.

The DOJ found, and the state agreed, that those with developmental disabilities have experienced violations of their constitutional rights “that can’t continue,” the judge said.

“I don’t want to disagree with anything, but I want to focus on why we are here,” McConnell said.

Court To Hear Plan To Shore Up RI DD Providers

By Gina Macris

A federal court monitor says Rhode Island must release $2 million a month designated for adults with developmental disabilities to keep service providers afloat between December and June.

The money would be used exclusively to recruit and retain new workers and boost the pay of existing staff to a minimum of $20 an hour, as well as cover the cost of personal protective equipment and other expenses related to COVID-19.

A. Anthony Antosh submitted a three-page report outlining the rationale for his plan to the U.S. District Court Nov. 18 and asked the state to tell the court how it will address the recommendations by Nov. 30. Chief Judge John J. McConnell has moved up the deadline, scheduling an on-line hearing on the status of consent decree compliance at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Nov. 24.

Antosh said that a rise in coronavirus cases has affected the population with intellectual or developmental disabilities in several ways:

• More people are sick

• Private services providers and families independently managing their loved ones’ programs can’t find staff

• The number and frequency of employment-related services and supports for community activities required by the consent decree has declined

Under the current fee-for-service system, providers are increasingly constrained in their ability to file claims with the state, exacerbating their already-precarious financial condition.

Antosh indicated that the state could release $2 million a month to service providers for the next six months because average monthly spending has decreased by roughly that amount from April through October, when compared with the previous six-month period.

He warned that the consortium hired by the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) to review the system top to bottom concluded that private provider agencies were fiscally “fragile and profoundly undercapitalized” even before the pandemic hit. Now their financial position is even worse, Antosh said.

Private service agencies, which support about 83 percent of the population protected by the consent decree, are using most of their resources to serve adults in group homes, where COVID-19 cases are multiplying, Antosh said. Citing a daily report of new cases provided by BHDDH, he said 28 percent of all positive cases in residents, 35 percent of all positive cases in staff and 21 percent of all hospitalizations have occurred in the past six weeks.

A total of 580 staff and residents in 147 group homes – about half of the 291 congregate care settings in the state – have tested positive since the pandemic began, Antosh said.

Source: A. Anthony Antosh, Court Monitor

Several agencies report they are unable to get staff unless they pay them $30 an hour in COVID-positive group homes and $25 an hour in quarantined homes, where the COVID status is uncertain. Even then, they cannot find enough workers to fill the state staffing requirements, Antosh said.

People with developmental disabilities living in family homes, meanwhile, “are receiving only limited supports related to employment and integrated community and day activities,” the monitor’s report said.

The monitor said the state “has demonstrated good faith in attempting to address the impact of COVID-19” in multiple ways, including:

• Special payments early in the pandemic that allowed providers to bill at pre-COVID rates for two months

• Recent approval of an additional $3 million from the CARES Act to provide up to $1,200 in “payroll support” for existing full time direct care staff or recruitment funds for new staff. That boost is also time-limited, Antosh said.

Despite these and other initiatives, Antosh said, “there is significant concern that, if additional resources are not provided for the remainder of the current fiscal year, providers will be unable to recruit and retain sufficient staff needed to provide the employment and community services required by the Consent Decree.”

Antosh said BHDDH figures show a decrease of $11,444,874 in expenditures for developmental disabilities from April to October, when compared with the previous six-month period, an average of $1,907,479 per month. His plan recommends the state put that money to use by allocating $2 million a month, beginning in December, through the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2021.

As has been the case with other COVID-funding initiatives, providers should submit a proposal and a rationale, Antosh said. He said those who direct their own programs or who live independently or with families also should have access to these funds.

The public may observe the court hearing on line by going to the calendar page of the U.S. District Court and entering the date, November 24, and the name of Judge McConnell. To access the calendar click here.

Families Struggle While Federal Judge Awaits Progress Report On RI DD System Reform

By Gina Macris

Tonya LeCour, a teacher who is scheduled to return to work Sept. 1, also serves as the sole caregiver for a family member with developmental disabilities.

What will happen to her job if she can’t find daytime supports for the person who depends on her?

LeCour was among several participants who sounded similar concerns at a virtual forum hosted online by the Rhode Island Division of Developmental Disabilities Aug. 17, with technical assistance from the Rhode Island Parent Information Network.

The comments reprised the July 30 testimony of Carol Dorros, M.D., who told Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court of her experience caring for her adult son with developmental disabilities fulltime, and her inability to practice medicine, since the COVID-19 pandemic hit Rhode Island in March.

Those familiar with the developmental disabilities community say they believe there are hundreds of people facing wrenching stituations similar to those described by Dorros and LeCour.

Rhode Island is now days away from a court-imposed deadline of August 30 – the first of six such target dates – to outline its strategies for shoring up the developmental disabilities system in the short term and ensuring it complies in the long run with a 2014 consent decree seeking to enforce the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The court’s review comes against the background of strained state finances.

The state budget office has sent a memo to all department heads, including A. Kathryn Power, director of the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) to submit budget proposals for the next fiscal year that cut overall spending by 15 percent.

In a statement, a spokesman said “BHDDH, like all state departments, is working with its financial team and program managers to assess all options in meeting the 15 percent reduction in FY 22 spending, per the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) guidance.”

At the same time, the state Division of Developmental Disabilities has convened several “workgroups” to tackle the issues, and, according to McConnell’s order, is expected to submit a report Aug. 30 that will “describe the process or strategy” for addressing the problems, the timeline for resolving them, and the particular agency or agencies responsible for each item. ( Update: The report was submitted to an independent court monitor, A. Anthony Antosh, who said it was under his review the week of Sept. 6 and would be submitted to the court when the review is finished.)

The developmental disabilities issues are complex. They include include reimbursement rates keyed to staffing ratios that were designed for congregate care and do not translate well to community activities.

For example, the reimbursement structure may require a support person to take along five people with the same budget authorization on a community activity, whether or not their needs or interests fit into the purpose of the outing. Conversely, staffers may have to jump through hoops to come up with an activity that will appeal to all members of the group.

People receiving services may opt for one-on-one assistance, but that decreases the number of service hours during the week. A typical funding authorization for one person translates into about six hours a week of one-on-one help, according to calculations of the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island, a trade association.

In re-shaping the system, the state has at its disposal a recently-completed 134-page report from the New England States Consortium Systems Organization (NESCSO), which was hired more than 18 months ago at a cost of $1.1 million to conduct a comprehensive study that grew out of increasing demand for a review of rates paid to private providers of developmental disability services.

At the request of BHDDH, NESCSO’s consultants did not make specific recommendations but conducted an exhaustive assessment of the current y situation and presented options for change that the state might consider.

NESCSO described the financial position of the three dozen agencies providing services as “tenuous,” re-affirming interim findings made before the pandemic hit.

The report suggested that an increase in long-term employment among adults with developmental disabilities could save the state millions of dollars in the long run that would otherwise be spent on daytime supports.

However, increasing employment, a goal of the consent decree, would require an up-front investment in employment-related supports and retaining the staff necessary to carry them out.

NESCSO estimates that a 33 percent increase in wages, now an average of $13.18 for front line workers, will result in a 50 percent reduction in turnover, which ranges up to 58 percent in some agencies.

BHDDH has not made any public comment on the report.

In the meantime, service providers seem to be keeping a lid on the pandemic in group homes but are struggling to provide scaled-up daytime supports that meet safety guidelines under the current funding structure.

As of Aug. 25, a total of 164 group home residents had tested positive since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, three more than reported July 21. Of that total, 48 have been hospitalized and 10 have died, according to a BHDDH spokesman. The numbers indicate that the five people who were hospitalized in late July have all been discharged. The most recent death was reported in June.

During the Aug. 17 public hearing, Kevin Savage, director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities, said, “we don’t want to just go back to doing things the old way.”

He offered to speak privately after the meeting with several individuals, including LeCour, the teacher, and a woman whose sister was in a group home and having problems eating as a result of the social isolation brought on by the pandemic.

Linda Ward, executive director of Opportunities Unlimited, chimed in with the providers’ perspective:

“It’s not about re-opening (daytime services) but meeting a person’s needs one person at a time,” she said. Funding limitations may dictate that individuals get one day a week of services, she said.

And there’s no “community” to access except for a socially distanced one, Ward said. Moreover,

staff are concerned about exposing themselves and their families to the virus, she said.

“I know that’s not helpful to families desperate for supports but we have to do it one at a time,” Ward said.

Meanwhile, the state’s finances, battered by the COVID-19 pandemic, remain in flux. Much could change before the budget is finalized for the 2022 fiscal year, which begins next July 1. The state budget director, Jonathan Womer, says as much in his memo to department heads dated Aug. 7.

In terms of developmental disabilities issues, Judge McConnell has ordered officials in both the executive and legislative branches, who hold the state’s purse strings, to participate “as needed” in a year-long review of 16 specific issues of concern, and to help find solutions to them.

BHDDH has held initial meetings of five “workgroups” to address issues raised in the judge’s order. In its most recent developmental disabilities community newsletter, the agency put out a call for volunteers interested in working on one of the five committees.

“We are looking for individuals receiving services and family members to participate in their choice of one of five workgroups to add their expertise and input into the system reform,” the newsletter said.

Anyone interested may email Cindy Fusco at Cynthia.Fusco@bhddh.ri.gov.

The newsletter described the workgroups as follows:

1. Eligibility Process Workgroup: This workgroup will look at the process for determining the support needs of each individual and the need to consolidate the application for all pertinent RI services into one process.

2. Appeals Process Workgroup: This workgroup will look at the appeals process for individuals as it relates to eligibility, level of need, or funding level, including the L9/S109 (appeals) process for requesting additional funding.

3. Individual Budgets and Authority Workgroup: This workgroup will look at the process and timeline for developing annual individual budgets responsive to individual needs, allowable costs, and flexibility.

4. Fiscal Workgroup: This workgroup will look at authorizatons, rates, and billing units.

5. Contracts Workgroup: This workgroup will look at the timeline and process by which individuals contract with providers, billing procedures, and how to increase individual control over their services and how their budget is spent.

Judge Signals Stepped-Up Oversight Of RI Olmstead Consent Decree

By Gina Macris

John J. McConnell, Jr.

Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court is gearing up to order a soup-to-nuts overhaul of Rhode Island’s troubled developmental disability service system and he wants a detailed plan hammered out during the next year. 

Chronic problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic have pushed McConnell’s long-simmering concerns over the fiscal stability of developmental disability services “front and center,” as the judge put it during a public hearing in mid-May.

At that time, he asked an independent court monitor to recommend steps for ensuring the long-term survival of a reformed system that will be in full compliance with the Integration Mandate of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The proposed directive resulted from the monitor’s recommendations.

The order, sent to lawyers for comment earlier this month, says the state must fix systemic problems that pose “fiscal and administrative barriers” to compliance with a 2014 civil rights consent decree, which calls for integrated work and non-work activities based on a 40-hour week of services.

The barriers to compliance include the major pillars of a fee-for-service system the General Assembly enacted in 2011 that incentivized segregating adults with developmental disabilities in sheltered workshops and day care centers, in violation of the ADA’s Integration Mandate, according to findings of the  U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The Integration Mandate was re-affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1999 Olmstead decision.

Although the last sheltered workshops closed in 2018, some center-based day programs were still in operation before the pandemic hit.

Hearing Scheduled July 30

McConnell has given state and federal lawyers until July 30 to  tell him why his three-page directive should not move forward as a formal order, with a deadline of June 30, 2021 to develop a new system that meets the needs of the roughly 4000 individuals it serves.

Lawyers for the state and the DOJ have responded with an agreed-upon list of topics to be discussed at an upcoming hearing on the status of consent decree compliance.

The agenda, filed with the court July 23, said the state would address both long-term compliance with the consent decree and the immediate pressures posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the developmental disabilities system.

Specifically, the lawyers said they would present information on:

• Integrated employment and day services and the state’s phased reopening

• Support for providers and families during the continuing COVID pandemic

• Preparations for a potential second wave of the pandemic

• The fiscal issues and administrative barriers identified by the judge and a plan by the state to resolve them in phases, beginning with quarterly funding authorizations, staffing ratios, and the requirement to bill for daytime services in 15-minute increments.

Finally, the agenda said the discussion would include the state’s plans for substantial compliance with all requirements of the consent decree by 2024, the year it expires.

The judge’s proposed order would involve the state’s Medicaid administration, the Governor’s office, and the General Assembly in developing solutions to problems in the developmental disability service system and would require progress reports every two months between August 30 and June 30, 2021.

McConnell also wants the state to collaborate with families and providers in developing their plans.

McConnell is expected to take up the proposed order during the remote video hearing on July 30, beginning at 2 p.m. The public may sign in to attend no later than 1:45 p.m. through video or telephone, with instructions posted on the court’s public access web page, here.

COVID-19 Forced Near Shutdown Of Day Services

The coronavirus has hit hard at gains made in the number of regular jobs worked by adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities and the time they spend enjoying non-work activities as part of their communities.

A spokesman for the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) indicated that about 35 percent of those who had jobs March 1 were still working at the end of May.

Non-work recreational and other activities also have been decimated, but no figures were available from BHDDH about the number of people who don’t have any daytime supports or can’t get the same number of service hours they had before the pandemic.

Parents expressed alarm about a lack of guidance on the resumption of services during a July 21 on-line forum hosted by the Community Provider Network of Rhode Island (CPNRI.)

Susan Willemsen, a parent, wrote in the chat box that accompanied the video meeting: “This is very scary, especially for the parents who need to work and your child does not understand the situation. It is very difficult to be home working 40 hours to survive and take care of a child who is 100% dependent on you. Trying to understand where we go from here.”

Tina Spears, executive director of CPNRI, said providers remain in a precarious financial position and called on the entire developmental disabilities community to press state and federal officials for more funding and priority status for group home operators to conduct on-site testing and gain access to personal protective equipment.

By all accounts, some three dozen private service providers licensed by the state to support adults with developmental disabilities were in tenuous financial condition before the coronavirus pandemic hit Rhode Island in March.

Coping with the pandemic has further exposed gaps in funding and service delivery, which in turn raise questions about the providers’ ability to survive long enough to benefit from a court-ordered restructuring without more immediate and urgent intervention. 

For example, the need for social distancing calls for one-on-one or small group staffing, preferably with the same clients consistently matched to the same support people. But the current funding structure typically will pay for six hours a week of one-on-one support, according to Spears.

Judge Spells Out Requirements

McConnell, meanwhile, indicated he wants change from the first moment an individual or family applies for services from the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD).

McConnell said there is a need to consolidate application procedures “for all pertinent RI services into one process.”  That includes streamlining the process for determining Medicaid eligibility and eligibility for developmental disability services, respectively, as well as any other state-funded supports a person might need.

Within the developmental disability service system itself, the judge wants the state to “review, address, and develop a strategy” for resolving problems in the following areas:

• The process and timeline for determining DDD eligibility and individual budgets, as well as the process and timeline in which individuals select private provider organizations.

• The process in which families and service providers appeal DDD’s decisions on eligibility, designated level of need, or funding level.

• The requirement that providers document each staff person’s time, in connection with each client, in 15-minute increments during the day as a condition of reimbursement.

• Reimbursements that are linked to specific staff-to-client ratios. McConnell didn’t spell out the details of how those ratios hinder integration, but one provider has offered a memorable example: The provider said the staffing ratios forced him to group together five clients with widely differing interests for job exploration in one community setting where he could supervise without help from another staffer. 

• Funding authorizations for each client that last only three months at a time, with no ability to carry forward any unused portion of the budget beyond the designated fiscal quarter. That feature, combined with the fee-for-service structure of the billing services, means that unless there is 100 percent attendance by all persons at all times, the spending ceiling can never be reached. A consultant’s study several years ago found that providers billed for an average of 85 percent of funding authorizations.

  The requirement that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, recognized as life-long conditions, must periodically re-establish their eligibility status for services.

McConnell also asked the state to come up with:

• A clear definition of functions and activities for which funding is permitted, along with the associated rates for each.

• Different funding levels for different activities that are “responsive to individual support needs.”

• Guidance on combining individual budgets at the request of the people involved

With the state shutdown beginning in March, service providers shifted their attention to the safety of those in group homes.

A total of 10 group home residents have died from COVID-19, according to a BHDDH spokesman. As of July 21, 161 group home residents had tested positive and a total of 48 had been hospitalized at one point or another. Five people were in the hospital on July 21, the spokesman said.

Spears, the CPNRI director, explained during the virtual public forum that providers have faced unprecedented costs in securing personal protective equipment for staff, carrying out aggressive cleaning protocols and paying for overtime, while being unable to bill the state for many services.

Providers did get some emergency federal assistance channeled through the state, albeit less than what was originally promised, to continue operations through periods of the highest risk and to give temporary pay raises to staff. But those supports have now ended, Spears said, and there’s “no grand way or plan forward” for moving the system to a new normal.

Spears said a top priority is permanent pay hikes for staff, who have been chronically underpaid and have “a thousand reasons” during the pandemic to stay home.

State officials are waiting for Congress to decide on a second stimulus package before moving ahead to set the budget for the current fiscal year. The pace of budget deliberations is expected to pick up in early August, said State Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, who is first vice-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

In a brief interview the day after the meeting, Spears said the imperative for moving forward with a plan for re-opening developmental disability services should flow from the state’s legal and moral responsibility, not the budget.

State officials can “sit in a holding pattern and worry about the budget all you want, but these are human lives we’re talking about,” she said.

Pandemic Pushes Worry Over RI DD System Survival “Front And Center” - Judge McConnell

By Gina Macris

Judge McConnell

The federal judge overseeing the reform of Rhode Island’s developmental disability system says the COVID-19 pandemic has sharpened his concern about the financial ability of the state and its service providers to meet long-term goals of the consent decree, which mandates integration of the target population at work and at play.

Other participants in a May 18 hearing in U.S. District Court in Providence echoed the judge’s concerns, but they also said the pandemic has created a great opportunity to cement changes that might not otherwise have come as quickly.

“The fiscal health and stability of providers has always been in the back of my mind,” said Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr., noting that his worry has come “front and center with this crisis.” Stability is “essential for the consent decree to play out and be seen as accomplished,” he said.

The state and federal governments in 2014 agreed to a civil rights consent decree mandating employment-related services to provide access to jobs in the community for people with developmental disabilities as well as supports to allow them to enjoy integrated non-work activities. The decree runs until 2024.

Kevin Savage

During the hearing, Kevin Savage, the state’s new Director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities, disclosed immediate financial concerns. He said that the state has not received approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the second of three advance payments promised to keep private providers fiscally afloat during the height of the pandemic.

On March 26, the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (BHDDH) announced that a total of $15.4 million in federal-state Medicaid funding had been set aside for these so-called “retainer payments” during April, May, and June.

While the April payment has received CMS approval, the one for May has not, Savage said. A BHDDH spokesman later said that $5.1 million in advance payments to providers were made May 15.

Savage said it was “important that the state make that payment” to the providers.

The BHDDH spokesman later elaborated:

“When the retainer payments were first described and provided in Rhode Island, CMS had not issued technical guidance on these types of payments.” Since then, he said, CMS has limited retainer payments to a 30-day period, but that “the state is actively working with CMS to expand this time frame.”

CMS reimburses a little more than half of any Medicaid cost applied to the Division of Developmental Disabilities, but if the federal government ultimately does not approve the May 15 payment to providers, the state will be responsible for the entire $5.1 million.

As to the June advance payment, Savage said during the court hearing that the money will be re-cast as an increase in Medicaid rates that adds up to the same amount originally promised to providers.

He also disclosed that one provider decided to change the type of services it offers and the executive director resigned over the issue. Going forward, Savage said, he understands that particular agency would be “less focused” on the kind of individualized work his division wants to do, but he reserved further comment until he has had a chance to speak in depth with agency officials.

The hearing was streamed via the internet application Zoom, as have been previous U.S. District Court proceedings since the federal court building on Kennedy Plaza was closed in early March at the start of the pandemic. For the first time on May 18, however, the hearing was arranged so that the public could see the participants as well as hear them.

Victoria Thomas, a lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice, said the DOJ is “very focused” on how those protected by the consent decree will get community-integrated services going forward.

The capacity of providers to deliver those services involves more than funding, she said. The state needs to make administrative changes to ensure a stable system of integrated services and supports.

A. Anthony Antosh, the independent court monitor in the case, pressed for two immediate administrative changes:

● Annual funding authorizations for service recipients to replace the quarterly allocations now in place.

● The end of prescribed staffing ratios according to five funding “tiers,” which are based on perceived levels of disability and do not necessarily reflect the amount of support needed for a task at hand.

Savage said the staffing ratios are written into Medicaid rules, and BHDDH could work administratively with CMS to eliminate them. The ratios were designed for center-based day care and providers have argued that the ratios do not work in an individualized community setting. Families and other advocates also oppose them.

Savage said the quarterly funding authorizations were enacted by the General Assembly and cannot be changed without its approval. The fiscal arm of BHDDH favors quarterly payments, he said.

Melody Lawrence, Director of Policy and Delivery System Reform at the state Executive Office of Health and Human Services, said the argument for quarterly authorizations is to “ensure that the resources go to those who need them most.”

McConnell questioned how often people’s service needs change.

“You are doing more frequent checks to make sure people actually need those services,” Lawrence replied.

Two experts have testified before a special legislative commission that Rhode Island is the only state with quarterly funding of adult developmental disability services, a feature which providers have said repeatedly makes it difficult for them to plan ahead or prepare for the kinds of long-term changes the consent decree demands.

The commission, led by State Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, recommended more than a year ago that the state switch to annual funding of individualized service plans. It is generally accepted among developmental disability professionals that barring unexpected events, like the death of a family member, the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental challenges remain fairly stable and predictable throughout their lives.

Savage said that fiscal officials at BHDDH are committed to creating a funding model that is “easier and more straightforward” for providers and families to navigate.

Thomas, the DOJ lawyer, told Savage: “We’ve been hearing that quarterly authorizations create an administrative burden on providers. We like hearing that you want to reduce administrative burdens.”

McConnell asked Antosh to report to the Court by the end of June what the state has done to ease administrative burdens on providers.

Antosh indicated his report will also include a rundown on the changes the state must undertake to satisfy the consent decree by 2024.

Based on his comments in the hearing, he is likely to include recommendations for increased reimbursement rates to providers and provisions for universal access to internet technology for those receiving developmental disability services.

During the hearing, Antosh asked Savage in the short term to eliminate the scale of rates it pays for various daytime direct support work and instead pay the highest one – assigned to community-based activities - for all front-line staff work.

Savage reminded Antosh of the state’s budget deficit, which has been estimated at $234 million in the fiscal year ending June 30 and a whopping $800 million if the next budget cycle is included in the total. He said his division would start on a case-by-case basis by focusing on funding the needs of each individual authorized to receive supports.

Antosh said a lack of access to internet technology has emerged as a big failing during the pandemic. Group home residents need access to wireless networks, as well as to tablets and other hardware that could help them feel less isolated and in the long run could assist providers with remote wellness checks and the like.

A relative handful of people receiving BHDDH-funded supported employment services have been able to work from home, Antosh said, but more would like to try, according to survey results passed on to him.

Technology must be part of the long-term future for the developmental disabilities service system, he said.

The pandemic has curtailed most daytime services and providers’ ability to bill for them in the current fee-for-service reimbursement system. Most of the daytime activities that have occurred have involved outdoor exercise, Antosh said.

At the same time, providers have had to bear the burden of costly cleaning protocols and other unexpected expenses in group homes that are not automatically reimbursed by the state.

As of Tuesday, May 19, the coronavirus affected 47 congregate care sites, according to the BHDDH spokesman. A total of 115 people in congregate care have tested positive, including 5 who were reported hospitalized on Tuesday. An additional 98 people have been exposed to the virus because of where they live but were asymptomatic. And 7 more persons have died from COVID-19, the spokesman said.

Antosh, meanwhile, said the coronavirus crisis has highlighted the fragility of families as well as providers as they have scrambled to support loved ones with developmental disabilities.

Families often have had no support in caring for adult children or siblings who may need attention of one kind or another all their waking hours – and during the night as well.

Antosh said those who direct their own program of services have had difficulty finding staff to relieve them during the crisis. About 700 persons or families direct their own programs, and BHDDH relaxed its rules on hiring staff to allow any capable adult – including parents and legal guardians who might otherwise be out of work.

Savage said a long-standing prohibition against paying legal guardians to support adults who receive BHDDH funding will not be re-instated after the state of emergency is over.

Antosh said 80 percent of family members answering a questionnaire distributed by a coalition of community organizations reported a high level of anxiety.

Seventy percent said they were concerned about what might happen if their loved one needed to be hospitalized or if they themselves became ill and could not continue as caregivers.

(The state Department of Health recently advised hospitals to make exceptions to their no-visitation policy during the pandemic for those who needed assistance in communications and the support of a familiar caregiver to understand medical procedures.)

Outside BHDDH and the Rhode Island Department of Education, which is responsible for transition services for high school students with developmental disabilities, state officials have been “slow to realize how vulnerable this population is,” Antosh said.

But once they understood, officials in other state agencies have become very sensitive to the needs of those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

He cited the hazard pay awarded to group home workers, a large order of personal protective equipment (PPE) delivered to providers two weeks ago, and another large order for family caregivers that arrived last week, and an increased focus on testing individuals and staff over the last several weeks.

Antosh said “all parties” have joined in discussions about “what re-opening looks like.”

File photos by Anne Peters